Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1295–1311 | Cite as

Survey on mobile social networking in proximity (MSNP): approaches, challenges and architecture

  • Yufeng WangEmail author
  • Athanasios V. Vasilakos
  • Qun Jin
  • Jianhua Ma
Article

Abstract

Recently, mobile social networks (MSN) have gained tremendous attention, which free users from face-to-monitor life, while still can share information and stay in touch with their friends on the go. However most MSN applications regard mobile terminals just as entry points to existing social networks, in which centralized servers (for storage and processing of all application/context data) and continual Internet connectivity are prerequisites for mobile users to exploit MSN services, even though they are within proximity area (like campus, event spot, and community, etc.), and can directly exchange data through various wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth, WiFi Direct, etc.). In this paper, we focus on mobile social networking in proximity (MSNP), which is explicitly defined in our paper as: MSNP is wireless peer-to-peer (P2P) network of spontaneously and opportunistically connected nodes, and uses geo-proximity as the primary filter in determining who is discoverable on the social network. In this paper, first, primary support approaches related to MSNP available in literature, are summarized and compared, including MSN, mobile P2P and opportunistic networks. And then, we offer the special characteristics of MSNP, open issues and potential solutions. A networking technologies and platform independent architecture is proposed for developing MSNP applications, and proof-of-concept implementation of WiFi direct based MSNP application is also provided. Our primary goal is to identify the characteristics, technical challenges and potential solutions for future MSNP applications, capable to flexibly adapt to different application domains and deployment requirements.

Keywords

Mobile social networking in proximity (MSNP) Spontaneous Opportunistic Peer-to-peer Platform independent development framework 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was partially supported by the JiangSu 973 Project BK2011027 and NSFC Grant 61171092.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Jianping, H. E., David, J. Miller, & Kesidis, G., Interest-group discovery and management by peer-to-peer online social networks, Technical report, http://www.cse.psu.edu/research/publications/tech-reports/2012/CSE%2013-001.pdf.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Eagle, N., & Pentland, A. (2006). Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4), 255–268.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila et al. (2010). User experience of social ad hoc networking: Findings from a large-scale field trial of TWIN, In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM). Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, W., Huang, Y., Nahrstedt, K. & Wu, B. (2010). Message propagation in ad-hoc-based proximity mobile social network, In Proceedings of pervasive computing and communications workshops 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sapuppo, S. L. A. (2010). Local social networks. In Proceedings of international conference on telecommunication technology and applications, 2010. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, C., Srirama, S. N., & Ling, S. (2012). An adaptive mediation framework for mobile P2P social content sharing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 7636, 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, C., Srirama, S. N. & Krishnaswamy, S., Ling, S. (2013). Proactive web service discovery for mobile social network in proximity. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology (JNIT), 4(2).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kayastha, N., Niyato, D., Wang, P. & Hossain, E. (2011). Applications, architectures, and protocol design issues for mobile social networks: A survey. In Proceedings of the IEEE 99(12).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellavista, P., Montanari, R., & Das, S. K. (2013). Mobile social networking middleware: A survey. Elsevier, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9(4), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, B., Wang, Y., Vasilakos, A. V., Ma, J. (2013). Mobile social networking: Reconnect virtual community with physical space, Telecommunication Systems Journal 52(3).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y., Tang, J., Jin, Q. & Ma, J. (2013). Overview mobile social networking in proximity (MSNP): Applications, characteristics and challenges, In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE/IFIP international conference on embedded and ubiquitous computing (EUC).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eagle, N., & Pentland, A. (2005). Social serendipity: Mobilizing social software. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(2), 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta, A., Kalra, D., Boston, & Borcea, C. (2008). MobiSoC: A middleware for mobile social computing applications. Mobile Networks and Application, 14(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sapuppo. (2010). Spiderweb: A social mobile network, In Proceedings of the European Wireless Conference (EW).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mani, M., Anh-Minh, N., & Crespi N., (2010). SCOPE: A prototype for spontaneous P2P social networking. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM workshops).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ford, et al. (2006). Persistent personal names for globally connected mobile devices, In Proceedings of OSDI.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    JXTA Community Projects, https://jxta.dev.java.net/.
  21. 21.
    Kalofonos, D. N., et al. (2008). MyNet: A platform for secure P2P personal and social networking services, In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PERCOM).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, A. I., Bjørnsg°ard T., & Saxlund K. (2007). Peer2Me—Rapid application framework for mobile peer-to-peer applications, In Proceedings of the international Symposium on collaborative technologies and systems (CTS).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Toledano, E., et al. (2013). CoCam: Real-time photo sharing based on opportunistic P2P networking, In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, G. D., Yu, Z., & Zhou, X. (2012). Enhancing spontaneous interaction in opportunistic mobile social networks. Communications in Mobile Computing (ComC), 1(6), 1–6.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boldrini, C., Conti, M., & Passarella, A. (2010). Design and performance evaluation of ContentPlace, a social-aware data dissemination system for opportunistic networks, Elsevier, Computer Networks, 54(4).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pelsui, L., Passarella, A. & Conti, M. (2006). Opportunistic networking: Data forwarding in disconnected mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Communication Magazine 134–141.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panisson, A., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Van den Broeck, W., Ruffo, G., & Schifanella, R. (2012). On the dynamics of human proximity for data diffusion in ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10, 1532–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marco, P., Michele, A. & Francesco, Z. (2010). GeoKad: A P2P distributed localization protocol. In Proceedings of IEEE PERCOM workshop.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Su, J., Scott, J., Hui, P., Crowcroft, J., de Lara, E., Diot, C., Goel, A., Lim, M. & Upton, E. (2007). Haggle: Seamless networking for mobile applications, In Proceedings of Ubicomp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Osnat (Ossi) Mokryn, Dror Karmi, Akiva Elkayam, Tomer Teller (2012). Help me: Opportunistic smart rescue application and system. In Proceedings of the 11th annual mediterranean workshop on Ad hoc Networking 98–105.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Papandrea, M., Vanini, S. & Giordano, S. (2009). A lightweight localization architecture and application for opportunistic networks. In Proceedings of the world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks and workshops (WoWMoM).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mart′ın-Campillo, J. Crowcroft, E. Yoneki, R. Mart′I and C. Mart′ınez- Garc′ıa (2010). Using Haggle to create an electronic triage tag, In Proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on mobile opportunistic networking 167–170.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nordström, E., Aldman, D., Bjurefors, F. & Rohner, C. (2009). Search-based picture sharing with mobile phones, In Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc), 327–328.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pietilainen, A.-K., Oliver, E., LeBrun, J., Varghese, G. & Diot, C. (2009) Mobiclique: Middleware for mobile social networking, In Proceedings ACM workshop online social network (WOSN), 49–54.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dubois, D., Bando, Y., Watanabe, K., & Holtzman, H. (2013) ShAir: Extensible middleware for mobile peer-to-peer resource sharing, In Proceedings of the 9th joint meeting on foundations of software engineering (ESEC/FSE Industrial Track).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trifunovic, S., Distl, B., Schatzmann, D., & Legendre, F. (2011). WiFi-Opp: Ad-Hoc-less opportunistic networking. In Proceedings of ACM mobicom workshop on challenged networks (CHANTS).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    Stauffer, M. (2012). Connectivity solutions for smart TVs. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on consumer electronics-Berlin (ICCE-Berlin), 245–249.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Elwhishi, A., Ho, P.-H., & Shihada, B. (2013). Contention aware mobility prediction routing for intermittently connected mobile network, Available online, Springer/ACM Wireless Networks (WINET), doi: 10.1007/s11276-013-0588-7.
  41. 41.
    Dressler, F. & Gerla, M. (2013). A framework for inter-domain routing in virtual coordinate based mobile networks, Springer/ACM Wireless Networks (WINET), 19. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Siddiqui, F., Zeadally, S., Kacem, T., & Fowler, S. (2012). Zero configuration networking: Implementation, performance, and security. Elsevier, Computers and Electrical Engineering, 38(5), 1129–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., & Yan, G., (2012). Fine-grained private matching for proximity-based mobile social networking, In Procedings of INFOCOM. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dodson, B., Vo, I., Purtell, T. J., Cannon A., & Lam, M. S. (2012) Musubi: Disintermediated interactive social feeds for mobile devices. In Proc. of the 21st International conference on World Wide Web (WWW).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yu, Z., Liang, Y., Xu, B., Yang, Y., & Guo, B. (2011). Towards a smart campus with mobile social networking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on internet of things (iThings).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Camps-Mur, Garcia-Saavedra, A., & Serrano, P., (2013). Device to device communications with wifi direct: Overview and experimentation, IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 20(3).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang, Y., Nakao, A., Vasilakos, A. V. & Ma, J. (2011) On the effectiveness of service differentiation based resource-provision incentive mechanisms in dynamic and autonomous P2P networks, Elsevier, Computer Network (COMNET), 55(17).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Crocker, P. B., (2011). Proximity based mobile social networking: Applications and technology, making new connections in the physical world, Smith’s Point Analytics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yufeng Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Athanasios V. Vasilakos
    • 3
  • Qun Jin
    • 4
  • Jianhua Ma
    • 5
  1. 1.Nanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of Western MacedoniaKozaniGreece
  4. 4.Waseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Hosei UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations