Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic mathematical models of batch experiments and fed-batch cultures for cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by Arthrobacter A302

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A glucose utilizing strain, Arthrobacter A302 was used for cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production in batch modes. The non-structured model in a 5 l stirred tank bioreactor for understanding, controlling, and optimizing the fermentation process was proposed using the logistic equation for microbial growth, the Luedeking-Piret equation for product formation and Luedeking-Piret-like equation for substrate uptake, respectively. The production of cAMP was a mixed-growth-associated pattern. Based on model prediction, a comparison of calculated value using the parameters evaluated above with another experimental data in 30 l bioreactor was used to test the model. The results predicted from the model were in good agreement with the experimental observations in 30 l bioreactor, which demonstrated that the model might be useful for the development and optimization of production of cAMP in industrial scale. Based on estimated kinetic parameters, three different fed-batch modes, constant rate and intermittent (once and repeated), were adopted in order to obtain more cAMP accumulation. Furthermore, the final production of cAMP reached 11.24 g l−1 after 72 h incubation using three stages feeding strategy. In particular, the cAMP productivity (0.156 g l−1 h−1) was successfully improved by 22.83, 11.43 and 9.86%, respectively, compared with the modes of the batch, constant rate fed-batch and intermittent fed-batch once.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

m :

Maintenance coefficient (g sugar per g biomass h−1)

P :

Produced cAMP concentration (g l−1)

P 0 :

Initial cAMP concentration (g l−1)

S :

Glucose concentration (g l−1)

S 0 :

Initial glucose concentration (g l−1)

t :

Fermentation time (h)

X :

Biomass concentration (g l−1)

X m :

Maximum biomass concentration (g l−1)

X 0 :

Initial biomass concentration (g l−1)

Y P/S :

Yield coefficient of cAMP on glucose concentration (g per g sugar)

Y X/S :

Yield coefficient of biomass on sugar (g per g sugar)

α:

Growth-associated product formation coefficient (g per g biomass)

β:

Non-growth-associated product formation coefficient (g per g biomass h−1)

μ:

Specific growth rate (h−1)

μ m :

Maximum specific growth rate (h−1)

References

  • Aborhey S, Williamson D (1977) Modeling of lactic acid production by Streptococcus cremoris hp. J Gen Appl Microbiol 23:7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoni FA (2000) Molecular diversity of cyclic AMP signalling. Front Neuroendocrin 21:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouguettoucha A, Balannec B, Nacef S (2007) A generalised unstructured model for batch cultures of Lactobacillus helveticus. Enzyme Microbial Technol 41:377–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XC, Bai JX, Cao JM, Li ZJ, Xiong J, Zhang L, Hong Y, Ying HJ (2009) Medium optimization for the production of cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′- monophosphate by Microbacterium sp. no. 205 using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 100:919–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XC, Song H, Fang T, Bai JX, Xiong J, Ouyang PK, Ying HJ (2010) Enhanced cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by Arthrobacter A302 through rational redistribution of metabolic flux. Bioresour Technol 101:3159–3163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng YY, He ZM, Song LF (2003) Kinetics of β-mannanase fermentation by Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnol Lett 25:1143–1146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-ochao F, Casas JA (1999) Unstructured kinetic model for sophorolipid production by Candida bombicola. Enzyme Microb Technol 25:613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong H, Lun S (1996) The kinetics of lysine batch fermentation. Chin J Biotechnol 12(Suppl):219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu SB, Yao JM, Yuan QP, Xue PJ, Zheng ZM, Yu ZL (2006) Kinetics of Agrobacterium tumefaciens ubiquinone-10 batch production. Proc Biochem 41:1908–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong D, Peng XR (2003) Role of the cAMP in immunological liver injury in mice: comparing LPS-induced model with LPS+BCG- indudced model. Chin Pharmacol Bull 19:940–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama J (1990) Isolation of mutants with improved production of cAMP from Microbacterium sp. no. 205 (ATCC21376). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:359–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy F, De Vuyst L (1999) Temperature and pH conditions that prevail during fermentation of sausages are optimal for production of the antilisterial bacteriocin sakacin K. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:974–981

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JZ, Weng LP, Zhang QL, Xu H, Ji LN (2003) A mathematical model for gluconic acid fermentation by Aspergillus niger. Biochem Eng J 14:137–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luong J, Mulchandani A, LeDuy A (1998) Kinetics of biopolymer synthesis: a revisit. Enzyme Microb Technol 10:326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín MR (1999) Alcoholic fermentation modeling: current state and perspectives. Am J Enol Viticult 50:166–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcphee I, Gibson LC, Kewney J, Darroch C, Stevens PA, Spinks D (2005) Cyclicnucleotide signalling: a molecular approach to drug discovery for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Soc Trans 33:1330–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho A, Hussey PJ, Trewavas AJ, Malhó R (2001) cAMP acts as a second messenger in pollen tube growth and reorientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10481–10486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oguma T, Honma S (1990) Dipeptides as the smallest proteinaceous activators of dephosphorylation of inosinicacid to inosine in 3′, 5′-cyclic AMP fermentation by Microbacterium sp. Agric Biol Chem 54:2721–2722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Othmane B, Salah H, Fatiha B (2007) Batch kinetics and modelling of Pleuromutilin production by Pleurotus mutilis. Biochem Eng J 36:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safi BF, Rouleau D, Mayer RC, Desrochers M (1986) Fermentation kinetics of spent sulfite liquor by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:944–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Chen XC, Cao JM, Fang T, Bai JX, Xiong J, Ying HJ (2010) Directed breeding of an Arthrobacter mutant for high-yield production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate by N+ ion implantation. Radiat Phys chem 79:826–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speers RA, Rogers P, Smith B (2003) Non-linear modeling of industrial brewing fermentation. J Inst Brew 109:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SF, Yang C, Wang SC, Wang JS, Hwang JS, Ho SP (2004) Effect of thuringiensin on adenylate cyclase in rat cerebral cortex. Toxicol Appl Pharm 194:34–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie DM, Liu DH, Liu TZ (2001) Modeling of glycerol production by fermentation in different reactor states. Process Biochem 36:1225–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Wang LM, Li FS, Hua DL, Ma CQ, Ma YH, Xu P (2010) Kinetics of D-lactic acid production by Sporolactobacillus sp. strain CASD using repeated batch fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:6499–6505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major Basic R&D Program of China (2007CB707803), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2006AA020204), and China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (21025625).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanjie Ying.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Chen, X., Ren, H. et al. Dynamic mathematical models of batch experiments and fed-batch cultures for cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by Arthrobacter A302. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27, 2379–2385 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0707-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0707-5

Keywords

Navigation