Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of manure from pigs fed chlortetracycline as growth promotant on soil microbial community structure

World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chlortetracycline (CTC), an antimicrobial compound used in animal production, is not sorbed or degraded in the animal, and may enter the field environment through manure land-spreading. This study determined the influence of a single application of manure with or without CTC on field soil microbial community characteristics. Manures from swine fed unamended or CTC-amended rations were applied at 7,000 kg solid ha−1 to a Brandt silty clay loam soil that had no known prior history of manure application. Soil samples taken 1, 7, 28, or 42 days after treatment (DAT) were analyzed for aerobic culturable counts on R2A agar and most probable number using 2,4-D as sole carbon source. Soil extracts of 1, 7, and 42 DAT samples were subjected to polymerase chain reaction followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene pool. Gels were analyzed by Neighbor Joining based on Euclidean distance and Raup–Crick multivariate statistical analysis, and selected bands were extracted to identify predominant community members. Both manure applications initially changed soil microbial diversity, however, communities appeared to converge over time, so that no long-term significant effect was detected with this single application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

References

  • APHIS (2008) Highlights of Swine 2006 Part II: Reference of Swine Health and Health Management Practices in the United States, 2006. USDA: APHIS: Veterinary Services, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health

  • Aust MO, Godlinski F, Travis GR, Hao XY, McAllister TA, Leinweber P, Thiele-Bruhn S (2008) Distribution of sulfamethazine, chlortetracycline and tylosin in manure and soil of Canadian feedlots after subtherapeutic use in cattle. Environ Pollut 156:1243–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J, Garton NJ, Cummings SP (2006) The impact of acrylonitrile and bioaugmentation on the biodegradation activity and bacterial community structure of a topsoil. Folia Microbiol 51:591–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brozel VS, Cloete TE (1992) Evaluation of nutrient agars for the enumeration of viable aerobic heterotrophs in cooling water. Water Res 26:1111–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chee-Sanford JC, Mackie RI, Koike S et al (2009) Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J Environ Qual 38:1086–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clay SA, Liu Z, Thaler R, Kennouche H (2005) Tylosin sorption to silty clay loam soils, swine manure, and sand. J Environ Sci Health B 40:841–850

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell GL (2002) Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim Biotechnol 13:7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff B (2005) Presence of tetracycline antibiotics in surface water. A study of the presence/absence of tetracycline in the Raccoon River watershed. Des Moines Water Works, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins HR, Collier CT, Anderson DB (2002) Antibiotics as growth promotants: mode of action. Anim Biotechnol 13:29–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammesfahr U, Heuer H, Manzke B, Smalla K, Thiele-Bruhn S (2008) Impact of the antibiotic sulfadiazine and pig manure on the microbial community structure in agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1583–1591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamscher G, Pawelzick HT, Hoper H, Nau H (2005) Different behavior of tetracyclines and sulfonamides in sandy soils after repeated fertilization with liquid manure. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:861–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon AF, Zarlenga DS, Hildreth MB (2006) Improved methods for isolating DNA from Ostertagia ostertagi eggs in cattle feces. Vet Parasitol 135:297–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hileman B (2001) Furor over animal antibiotic use. Chem Eng News 79:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamagata Y, Fulthorpe RR, Tamura K, Takami H, Forney LJ, Tiedje JM (1997) Pristine environments harbor a new group of oligotrophic 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-degrading bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2266–2272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LS, Carmosini N, Sassman SA, Dion HM, Sepulveda MS (2007) Agricultural contributions of antimicrobials and hormones on soil and water quality. Adv Agron 93:1–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libby DA, Schaible PJ (1955) Observations on growth responses to antibiotics and arsonic acids in poultry feeds. Science 121:733–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist JL (2010) The most probable number method. http://www.jlindquist.net/generalmicro/102dil3.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2010

  • Mellon M, Benbrook C, Benbrook K (2001) Hogging It!: Estimates of antimicrobial abuse in livestock. UCS Publication, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PR, Evenson A, Luckey TD, McCoy E, Elvehjem CA, Hart EB (1946) Use of sulfasuxidine, streptothricin, and streptomycin in nutritional studies with the chick. J Biolog Chem 165:437–441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, Brinkhoff T, Nübel U, Santegoeds C, Schäfer H, Wawer C (1998) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology. In: Akkermans DL, van Elsas DJ, de Bruijn FJ (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual, vol 3.4.4. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger J, Koburger J (1975) Understanding and teaching the most probable number technique. J. Milk Food Technol 38:540–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Page SW (2003) Mode of action. In: Page SW (ed) The role of enteric antibiotics in livestock production. Avcare, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen SO, Sommer SG, Beline F et al (2007) Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspective. Livestock Science 112:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM, Crick RE (1979) Measurement of faunal similarity in paleontology. J Paleontol 53:1213–1227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettedal E, Vilain S, Lindblom S et al (2009) Alteration of the ileal microbiota of weanling piglets by the growth-promoting antibiotic chlortetracycline. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5489–5495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan AK, Snape JR, Fearnside D, Barer MR, Curtis TP, Head IM (2003) Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidising bacterial communities in wastewater treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater. Fems Microbiology Ecology 43:195–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook JG, Russell R (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengelov G, Agerso Y, Halling-Sorensen B, Baloda SB, Andersen JS, Jensen LB (2003) Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ Int 28:587–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siunov AV, Nikitin DV, Suzina NE, Dmitriev VV, Kuzmin NP, Duda VI (1999) Phylogenetic status of Anaerobacter polyendosporus, an anaerobic, polysporogenic bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:1119–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone JJ, Clay SA, Zhu ZW, Wong KL, Porath LR, Spellman GM (2009) Effect of antimicrobial compounds tylosin and chlortetracycline during batch anaerobic swine manure digestion. Wat Res 43:4740–4750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winckler C, Grafe A (2001) Use of veterinary drugs in intensive animal production: evidence for persistence of tetracycline in pig slurry. J Soil Sedim 1:66–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by USGS Grant 104 program No. 06HQGR0120, US-EPA grant number CP-97835401-0, EPA-319 fund. We acknowledge use of the LC/MS and SDSU-Functional Genomics Core Facility, supported by NSF/EPSCoR Grant No. 0091948, NSF/EPSCOR Grant No 00919948, the South Dakota 2010 Drought Initiative, and the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker S. Brözel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, K.L., Brözel, V.S., Gibson, S.A. et al. Influence of manure from pigs fed chlortetracycline as growth promotant on soil microbial community structure. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27, 659–668 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0504-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0504-6

Keywords

Navigation