Microbial communities and chemical changes during fermentation of sugary Brazilian kefir
- 1.4k Downloads
The microorganisms associated with sugary Brazilian kefir beverage were investigated using a combination of culture-dependent and -independent methods. A total of 289 bacteria and 129 yeasts were identified via phenotypic and genotypic methods. Lb. paracasei (23.8%) was the major bacterial isolate identified, followed by Acetobacter lovaniensis (16.31%), Lactobacillus parabuchneri (11.71%), Lactobacillus kefir (10.03%) and Lactococcus lactis (10.03%). Saccharomyces cerevisiae (54.26%) and Kluyveromyces lactis (20.15%) were the most common yeast species isolated. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the microbiota was dominated by lemon-shaped yeast cells growing in close association with Lactobacillus (long and curved). Some lactic acid bacteria detected by sequence analysis of DGGE (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) bands were not recovered at any time through fermentation by plating. Conversely, DGGE fingerprints did not reveal bands corresponding to some of the species isolated by culturing methods. The bacteria Acetobacter lovaniensis and the yeast Kazachstania aerobia are described for the first time in sugary kefir. During the 24 h of fermentation, the concentration of lactic acid ranged from 0.2 to 1.80 mg/ml, and that of acetic acid increased from 0.08 to 1.12 mg/ml. The production of ethanol was limited, reaching a final mean value of 1.24 mg/ml.
KeywordsPCR-DGGE Culture-dependent and -independent methods Microbial community Lactobacillus Saccharomyces
The Brazilian agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Brasil (CNPQ), Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) are acknowledged for financial support and scholarships for KTM and GVMP.
- AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 16th edn. AOAC, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D (2000) Yeast—characteristic and identification. Cambrige University Press, CambrigeGoogle Scholar
- Hammes WP, Hertel C (2003) The genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. In: Dworkin M, Flakow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackbrandt E (eds) The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community, release 3.15. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Haruta S, Ueno S, Egawa I, Hashiguchi K, Fujii A, Nagano M, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2006) Sucession of bacterial and fungal communities during a traditional pot fermentation of rice vinegar assessed by PCR-mediated denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Int J Food Microbiol 109:79–87. doi: 0.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Williams ST (1994) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Lisdiyanti P, Kawasaki H, Seki T, Yamada Y, Uchimura T, Komagata K (2000) Systematic study of the genus Acetobacter with descriptions of Acetobacter indonesiensis sp. nov., Acetobacter tropicalis sp. nov., Acetobacter orleanensis (Henneberg 1906) comb. nov., Acetobacter lovaniensis (Frateur 1950) comb. nov., Acetobacter estunensis (Carr 1958) comb nov. J General Appl Microbiol 46:147–165. doi: 10.2323/jgam.46.147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Makimura K, Tamura Y, Mochizuki T, Hasegawa A, Tajiri Y, Hanazawa R, Uchida K, Saito H, Yamaguchi H (1999) Phylogenetic classification and species identification of dermatophyte strains based on DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions. J Clin Microbiol 37:920–924Google Scholar
- Ovreas L, Forney L, Daae FL, Torsvik V (1997) Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3367–3373Google Scholar