Skip to main content
Log in

Are bioleaching rates determined by the available particle surface area concentration?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that pulp density and particle size determine the available surface area concentration and have an influence in the overall rate of bioleaching of minerals. As metal solubilization takes place through the surface area of the particles, it can be expected that different combinations of pulp densities and particle sizes giving the same surface area concentration would determine the same leaching rate. The objective of this work was to test this hypothesis on the effect of surface area concentration, pulp density and particle size of the biooxidation of a pyritic gold concentrate by the thermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus metallicus in shake flasks. The gold concentrate was used at 2.5%, 5%, 10%, and 15% w/v pulp density and at four size fractions: 150–106, 106–75, 75–38 and –38 μm. Temperature was 68°C and the initial pH was 2.0. Results showed that the volumetric productivities of iron and sulfate depend not only on the surface area concentration but also on pulp density and particle size considered separately. These two variables not only determine surface area but also exert additional effects on the process, so the hypothesis was not confirmed. Maximum attained iron productivity was 1.042 g/l day with the 75–38 μm fraction at 5% pulp density. Maximum sulfate productivity was 4.279 g/l day with the 75–38 μm fraction at 10% pulp density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo F, Gentina JC, Valencia P (2004) Optimization of pulp density and particle size in the biooxidation of a pyritic gold concentrate by Sulfolobus metallicus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:865–869. doi:10.1007/s11274-004-1006-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groudev SN (1986) Continuous bacterial leaching of copper sulphide concentrates. In: Lawrance R, Brannion R, Ebner H (eds) Fundamental and applied biohydrometallurgy. Elsevier, Vancouver, pp 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison STL, Sissing A, Raja S, Pearce SJA, Lamaignere V, Nemati M (2003) Solids loading in the bioleach slurry reactor: mechanisms through which particulate parameters influence slurry bioreactor performance. In: 15th International Biohydrometallurgy Symposium Proceedings, Athens, 14–19 September 2003

  • Herrera L, Ruiz P, Agillon JC, Fehrmann A (1989) A new spectrophotometric method for the determination of ferrous iron in the presence of ferric iron. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 44:171–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard D, Crundwell FK (1999) A kinetic study of the leaching of chalcopyrite with Sulfolobus metallicus. In: Amils R, Ballester A (eds) Biohydrometallurgy and the environment toward the 21th century, part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 209–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kandler O, König H (1998) Cell wall polymers in Archaea (Archaeabacteria). Cell Mol Life Sci 54:305–308. doi:10.1007/s000180050156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levenspiel O (1972) Chemical reaction engineering, Chap 12, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemati M, Harrison STL (1999) Effects of solids particles on thermophilic bioleaching of sulphide minerals. In: Amils R, Ballester A (eds) Biohydrometallurgy and the environment toward the mining of the 21th century. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 473–482

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati M, Lowenadler J, Harrison STL (2000) Particle size effects in bioleaching of pyrite by acidophilic thermophile Sulfolobus metallicus (BC). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:173–179. doi:10.1007/s002530050005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris PR (1989) Factors affecting bacterial oxidation: the example of the carbon dioxide in the context of bacterial diversity. In: Salley J, McCready RGL, Wichlacz PL (eds) Proceedings of the international biohydrometallurgy symposium, CANMET, Canada, pp 3–14

  • Norris PR (1997) Thermophiles and bioleaching. In: Rawlings DE (ed) Biomining: theory, microbes and industrial processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinches A, Al-Jaid FO, Williams DJA (1976) Leaching of chalcopyrite concentrates with Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in batch culture. Hydrometallurgy 2:87–103. doi:10.1016/0304-386X(76)90020-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rikmanis M, Berzins A, Viesturs U (2007) Excess turbulence as a cause of turbohypobiosis in cultivation of microorganisms. Cent Eur J Biol 2:481–501. doi:10.2478/s11535-007-0038-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sissing A, Harrison STL (2003) Thermophilic mineral bioleaching performance: a compromise between maximizing mineral loading and maximizing microbial growth and activity. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 103(Part 2):139–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toma MK, Ruklisha MP, Vanags JJ, Zeltina MO, Leite MP, Galinina NI, Viesturs UE, Tengerdy R (1991) Inhibition of microbial growth and metabolism by excess turbulence. Biotechnol Bioeng 38:552–556. doi:10.1002/bit.260380514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torma AE, Walden CC, Duncan DW, Brannion RMR (1972) The effect of carbon dioxide and particle surface on the microbiological leaching of a zinc sulfide concentrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 14:777–786. doi:10.1002/bit.260140507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FONDECYT project 1020768.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Valencia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valencia, P., Acevedo, F. Are bioleaching rates determined by the available particle surface area concentration?. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25, 101–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9866-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9866-4

Keywords

Navigation