Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of Giardia, Entamoeba, and Cryptosporidium in unprocessed food items from northern India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the load of three food- and water-borne parasites, namely, Giardia, Entamoeba, and Cryptosporidium on food items that are consumed either raw or in an unprocessed state in the northern parts of India. A two-step diagnostic method was employed to assess the presence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium, the immunofluorescence assay (IFA) combined with the polymerase chain reactiion (PCR assay), whereas a Tech lab diagnostic kit in combination with PCR assay was used for accurate detection of Entamoeba histolytica in the samples. The methods for isolation and enrichment of cysts/oocysts from the various food items were tested and discussed here. Our results showed that the overall spectrum of incidence of the three parasites on food items in decreasing order were Giardia Entamoeba Cryptosporidium. When data were subjected to the chi-square test, the prevalence of all three parasites was found to be independent of the food items. To determine whether the presence of two types of parasites in a food item is uniform, a Poisson distribution test was conducted. On comparing the intensity of occurrence of the different parasites in various food items, it was observed that the occurrence of Giardia and Entamoeba was not of the same order at 5% level of significance only in case of samples of raw meat and milk. This confirmed that a high number of raw or unpasteurized milk and meat samples are more likely to be contaminated with Giardia than with Entamoeba. Therefore, our observations point to the unhygienic practices of food handlers being a major contributor in the transmission of parasites to unprocessed food products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armon R, Gold D, Brodsky M, Oron G (2002) Surface and subsurface irrigation with effluents of different qualities and presence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in soil and on crops. Water Sci Technol 46:115–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrowood MJ, Sterling CR (1987) Isolation of Cryptosporidium oocysts and sporozoites using discontinuous sucrose and isopycnic Percoll gradients. J Parasitol 73:314–319. doi:10.2307/3282084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo M, Carazo M, Arias ML, Chaves C, Monge R, Chinchilla M (2004) Prevalence of Cyclospora sp., Cryptosporidium sp., Microsporidia and fecal coliform determination in fresh fruit and vegetables consumed in Costa Rica. Arch Latinamerican Nutr 54:428–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1996) Foodborne outbreak of diarrheal illness associated with Cryptosporidium parvum–Minnesota, 1995. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 45:783–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobden I (1989) Exotic diarrhoeal problems and poliomyelitis. Practitioner 233:927–931

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fotedar R, Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J (2007) Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:511–532. doi:10.1128/CMR.00004-07

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelletlie R, Stuart J, Soltanpoor N, Armstrong R, Nichols G (1997) Cryptosporidiosis associated with school milk. Lancet 350:1005–1006. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64071-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter PR, Hughes S, Woodhouse S, Syed Q, Verlander NQ, Chalmers RM et al (2004) Sporadic cryptosporidiosis: case-control study with genotyping. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1241–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonnalagadda PR, Bhat RV (1995) Parasitic contamination of stored water used for drinking/cooking in Hyderabad. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 26:789–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Gooze L, Petersen C, Gut J, Nelson RG (1992) Isolation, sequence and molecular karyotype analysis of the actin gene of Cryptosporidium parvum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 50:105–114. doi:10.1016/0166-6851(92)90248-I

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laberge I, Griffiths MW (1996) Prevalence, detection and control of Cryptosporidium parvum in food. Int J Food Microbiol 32:1–26. doi:10.1016/0168-1605(96)00977-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laberge I, Ibrahim A, Barta JR, Griffiths MW (1996) Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in raw milk by PCR and oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3259–3264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millard PS, Gensheimer KF, Addiss DG, Sosin DM, Beckett GA, Houck-Jankoski A et al (1995) An outbreak of cryptosporidiosis from fresh-pressed apple cider. JAMA 272:1592–1596. doi:10.1001/jama.272.20.1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge R, Chinchilla M, Reyes L (1996) Seasonality of parasites and intestinal bacteria in vegetables that are consumed raw in Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 44:369–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue PJ (1995) Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in man and animals. Int J Parasitol 25:39–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega YR, Roxas CR, Gilman RH, Miller NJ, Cabrera L, Taquiri C et al (1997) Isolation of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis from vegetables collected in markets of an endemic region in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 57:683–686

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Bhattacharya SK, Das P, Chaudhuri P, Dutta P, De SP et al (1989) Occurrence and significance of Cryptosporidium infection in Calcutta. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 83:520–521. doi:10.1016/0035-9203(89)90274-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Bairy I, Shivananda PG (2003) Opportunistic infections in AIDS cases. Indian J Med Sci 57:16–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slifko TR, Smith HV, Rose JB (2000) Emerging parasite zoonoses associated with water and food. Int J Parasitol 12–13:1379–1393. doi:10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00128-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Bhattacharya S, Paul J (2005) Species and strain-specific probes derived from repetitive DNA for distinguishing Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeaba dispar. Experimantal Parasitol 110:303–308. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2005.02.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeyer RA, Morley PS, Hyatt DR, Dargatz DA, Scorza AV, Lappin MR (2006) Evaluation of bacterial and protozoal contamination of commercially available raw meat diets for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 228:537–542. doi:10.2460/javma.228.4.537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston-Enriquez JA, Watt P, Dowd SE, Enriquez R, Pepper IL, Gerba CP (2002) Detection of protozoan parasites and microsporidia in irrigation waters used for crop production. J Food Prot 65:378–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij JJ, Blangé RA, Templeton K, Schinkel J, Brienen EA, van Rooyen MA et al (2004) Simultaneous detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum in fecal samples by using multiplex real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42:1220–1223. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.3.1220-1223.2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westrell T, Schonning C, Stenstrom TA, Ashbolt NJ (2004) QMRA (quantitative microbial risk assessment) and HACCP (hazard analysis and critical control points) for management of pathogens in wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and reuse. Water Sci Technol 50:23–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1993) Guidelines for drinking-water quality volume 1: Recommendations (2nd edn). World Health Organization, Geneva

  • Xiao L, Ryan UM (2004) Cryptosporidiosis: an update in molecular epidemiology. Curr Opin Infect Dis 17:483–490. doi:10.1097/00001432-200410000-00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by a research grant from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India, to JP as principal investigator. The authors are grateful to Dr. Lihua Xiao from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, for providing pure DNA of C. parvum. They are also indebted to Dr. Pradeep Das, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, for providing DNA from a natural isolate of Cryptosporidium. We sincerely thank Dr. Nancy Malla, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, for helping with the pure culture of Giardia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaishree Paul.

Annexure 1: Statistical analysis

Annexure 1: Statistical analysis

Incidence rates of parasites in food items

Note: Expected values are in boxes within each cell of observation. The values outside the boxes are the observed values.

$$ \chi^{2} = \sum\limits_{i} {\frac{{\left( {O_{i} - E_{i} } \right)^{2} }}{{E_{i} }}} = 4.76 $$

Tabulated \( \chi^{2} \) = 9.488 at α = 0.05 for 4 degrees of freedom

Rate of incidence of two parasites in a specific food item

Raw vegetable leaves

  1. (a)

    Giardia (N 1) = 12 and Entamoeba (N 2) = 8

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{12}{8 + 1} = 1.33 $$

    Tabulated F18,24 = 2.18 at α = 0.05

  1. (b)

    Cryptosporidium (N 1) = 1 and Giardia (N 2) = 12

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{1}{12 + 1} = 0.076 $$

    Tabulated F26,2 = 1.98 at α = 0.05

  1. (c)

    Cryptosporidium (N 1) = 1 and Entamoeba (N 2) = 8

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{1}{8 + 1} = 0.11 $$

    Tabulated F18,2 = 19.45 at α = 0.05

Meat samples

  1. (a)

    Giardia (N 1) = 13 and Entamoeba (N 2) = 7

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{13}{7 + 1} = 1.63 $$

    Tabulated F16,26 = 1.67 at α = 0.05

  1. (b)

    Cryptosporidium (N 1) = 3 and Giardia (N 2) = 13

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{3}{13 + 1} = 0.214 $$

    Tabulated F28,6 = 4.0 at α = 0.05

  1. (c)

    Cryptosporidium (N 1) = 3 and Entamoeba (N 2) = 7

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{3}{7 + 1} = 0.37 $$

    Tabulated F16,6 = 4.0 at α = 0.05

Milk samples

  1. (a)

    Giardia (N 1) = 16 and Entamoeba (N 2) = 7

    $$ F = \frac{{N_{1} }}{{N_{2} + 1}} = \frac{16}{7 + 1} = 2.0 $$

    Tabulated F16,32 = 1.98 at α = 0.05

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rai, A.K., Chakravorty, R. & Paul, J. Detection of Giardia, Entamoeba, and Cryptosporidium in unprocessed food items from northern India. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24, 2879–2887 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9824-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9824-1

Keywords

Navigation