Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mitigation of ruminant methane production: current strategies, constraints and future options

  • Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mitigating methane losses from cattle has economic as well as environmental benefits. The aim of this paper is to review the current approaches in relation to associated advantages and disadvantages and future options to reduce enteric methane emission from cattle. Current technologies can be broadly grouped into those that increase productivity of the animal (improved nutrition strategies) so that less methane is produced per unit of meat or milk, and those that directly modify the rumen fermentation so that less methane is produced in total. Data suggest that many of these practices are not appropriate for long term mitigation of methane emissions in ruminants because of their constraints. So it is necessity to develop long term strategies in suppressing methane production. An integrated research investigating animal, plant, microbe and nutrient level strategies would offer a long term solution of methane production. Genetic selection of animals, vaccination, probiotics, prebiotics and plant improvement are the most promising options of all the future approaches discussed. These approaches will reduce enteric methane production without any hazard to animal or environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur PF, Herd RM, Wright J, Xu G, Dibley K, Richardson EC (1996) Net feed conversion efficiency and its relationship with other traits in beef cattle. Proc Aust Soci Anim Prod 21:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur PF, Archer JA, Johnston DJ, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Parnell P (2001) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. J Anim Sci 79:2805–2811

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker SK, Gnanasampanthan G, Purser DB, Hoskinson RM (1997) Immunogenic preparation and method for improving the productivity of ruminant animals. Patent application: international publication number WO 97/00086

  • Bayaru E, Kanda S, Kamada T, Itabashi H, Andoh S, Nishida T et al (2001) Effect of fumaric acid on methane production, rumen fermentation, and digestibility of cattle fed roughage alone. Anim Sci J 72:139–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2005) Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. J Anim Sci 83:653–661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beever DE (1993) Ruminant animal production from forages: present position and future opportunities. In: Proceedings of the XV11 international grassland congress. SIR Publishing, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 535–542

  • Benchaar C, Pomar C, Chiquette J (2001) Evaluation of diet strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modeling approach. Can J Anim Sci 81:563–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno RGS, Rutigliano HM, Cerri RLA, Robinson PH, Santos JEP (2005) Effect of feeding a Saccharomyces Cerevisiae yeast culture on lactation performance of dairy cows under heat stress in ruminant nutrition, feed additives and Feedstuffs. J Anim Sci 85: Proquest Biology Journals, 310 pp

  • Callaway TR, Martin SA, Wampler JL, Hill NS, Hill GM (1997) Malate content of forage varieties commonly fed to cattle. J Dairy Sci 80:1651–1655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carro MD, Ranilla MJ (2003) Influence of different concentrations of disodium fumarate on methane production and fermentation of concentrate feeds by rumen micro-organisms in vitro. Br J Nutr 90(3):617–624. doi:10.1079/BJN2003935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Gouet P (1995) In-vitro H2 utilisation by a ruminal acetogenic bacterium cultivated alone or in association with an Archea methanogen is stimulated by a probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3466–3467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquette J, Benchaar C (2005) Effects of different dose levels of essential oils compounds on in vitro methane production by mixed ruminal bacteria. In Ruminant nutrition: feed additives and feedstuffs. J Dairy Sci 88(Suppl):306

  • Czerkawski JW, Blaxter KL, Wainman FW (1966) The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane production. Br J Nutr 20:349–362. doi:10.1079/BJN19660035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delmotte M, Chappellaz J, Brook E, Yiou P, Barnola JM, Goujon C, Raynaud D, Lipenkov VI (2004) Atmospheric methane during the last four glacial-interglacial cycles: Rapid changes and their link with Antarctic temperature. J Geophys Res 109:D12104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlugokencky EJ, Masarie KA, Lang PM et al (1998) Continuing decline in the growth rate of the atmospheric methane burden. Nature 393:447–450. doi:10.1038/30934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dlugokencky EJ, Houweling S, Bruhwiler L et al (2003) Atmospheric methane levels off: temporary pause or a new steady-state? Geophys Res Lett 30, ASC 5-1–5-4

  • Dohme F, Machmueller A, Estermann BL, Pfister P, Wasserfallen A, Kreuzer M (1999) The role of rumen ciliate protozoa for methane suppression caused by coconut oil. Lett Appl Microbiol 29:187–192. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00614.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Bae HD, McAllister TA, Mathison GW, Cheng KJ (1997) Lipid-induced depression of methane production and digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC). Can J Anim Sci 77:269–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitru R, Palencia H, Schroeder SD, Takacs BA, Rasche ME, Miner JL et al (2003) Targeting methanopterin biosynthesis to inhibit methanogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(12):7236–7241. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.12.7236-7241.2003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckard R (2001) Intensive livestock-dairy industries workshop, final report. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australia. www.affa.gov.au/corporate_docs/publications/pdf/nrm/greenhouse/Dairy_report.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2006

  • EPA (2008) http://www.epa.gov/. Accessed 15 May 2008

  • Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Francey RJ, Langenfelds RL (1998) Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climate variability. J Geophys Res 103:15979–15993. doi:10.1029/98JD00923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fievez V, Dohme F, Danneels M, Raes K, Demeyer D (2003) Fish oils as potent rumen methane inhibitors and associated effects on rumen fermentation in vitro and in vivo. Anim Feed Sci Technol 104:41–58. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00330-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay BJ, Fenchel T (1993) Methanogens and other bacteria as symbionts of free-living anaerobic ciliates. Symbiosis 14:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonty G, Senaud J, Jouany JP, Gouet P (1988) Establishment of ciliate protozoa in the rumen of conventional and conventionalized lambs: influence of diet and management conditions. Can J Microbiol 34(3):235–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller JR, Johnson DE (1981) Monensin and lasalocid effects on fermentation in vitro. J Anim Sci 53:1574–1580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giger-Reverdin S, Sauvant D (2000) Methane production in sheep in relation to concentrate feed composition from bibliographic data. In: Ledin I, Morand-Fehr P (eds) 8th Seminar of the sub-network on nutrition of the FAO-CIHEAM inter-regional cooperative research and development network on sheep and goats. INRA, Cahiers-Options-Mediterraneennes, Grignon, pp 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich RD, Garrett J, Gast DR, Kirick MA, Larson DA, Meiske JC (1984) Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. J Anim Sci 58:1484–14985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goopy JP, Hegarty RS (2004) Repeatability of methane production in cattle fed concentrates and forage diets. J Anim Feed Sci 13:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan H, Wittenberg KM, Ominski KH, Krause DO (no date) Potential use of ionophores for mitigation of enteric methane. http://www.biocap.ca/images/pdfs/conferencePosters/Guan_H_P1.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2006

  • Gunsalus RP, Wolfe RS (1978) ATP activation and properties of the methyl coenzyme M reductase system in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. J Bacteriol 135:851–857

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty RS (1999a) Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Aust J Agric Res 50:1321–1328. doi:10.1071/AR99008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty RS (1999b) Mechanisms for competitively reducing ruminal methanogenesis. Aust J Agric Res 50:1299–1306. doi:10.1071/AR99007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C (1973) The effects of fatty acids on pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J Agric Sci 81:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess HD, Valencia FL, Monsalve LM, Lascano CE, Kreuzer M (2004) Effects of tannins in Calliandra calothyrsus and supplemental molasses on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J Anim Feed Sci 13(Supplement 1):95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Holter JB, Young AJ (1992) Nutrition, feeding and calves: methane prediction in dry and lactating holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 75:2165–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu WL, Liu JX, Ye JA, Wu YM, Guo YQ (2005) Effect of tea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 120(3–4):333–339. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivan M, Veira DM, Kelleher CA (1986) The alleviation of chronic copper toxicity in sheep by ciliate protozoa. Br J Nutr 55:361–367. doi:10.1079/BJN19860042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalc D, Ceresnakova Z (2002) Effect of plant oils and malate on rumen fermentation in vitro. Czech J Anim Sci 47:106–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emission from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994a) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using an SF6 tracer technique. Environ Sci Technol 28:359–362. doi:10.1021/es00051a025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KA, Abo-Omar JS, Saa CF, Carmean BR (1994b) Persistence of methane suppression by propionate enhancers in cattle diets. In: Aguilera JF (ed) Proceedings of energy metabolism of farm animals 13th, Mojácar, Spain. CSIC Publication Services, Mojácar, Spain, pp 339–342

  • Jordan E, Lovett DK, Monahan FJ, Callan J, Flynn B, O’Mara FP (2006) Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. J Anim Sci 84:162–170. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman RG, Sauer FD, Jackson HA, Patni NK, Masse DI, Wolynet M et al (1997) Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from lactating Holsteins. Dairy Research Report, Centre for Food and Animal Research, Agriculture and Agricultural-Food Canada

  • Kirchgessner M, Windisch W, Müller HL (1995) Nutritional factors for the quantification of methane production. In: von Engelhardt W, Leonherd-Marke S, Breves G, Giesecke D (eds) Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and production. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on ruminant physiology. Delmar Publishers, Albany, Germany, pp 333–334

  • Kreuzer M, Kirchgessner J, Müller HL (1986) Effect of defaunation on the loss of energy in wethers fed different quantities of cellulose and normal or steam-flaked maize starch. Anim Feed Sci Technol 16:233–241. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(86)90114-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan GW, Payne AL, Peterson J (1978) Antimethanogenic drugs and Heliotropium europaeum poisoning in penned sheep. Aust J Agric Res 29:1281–1291. doi:10.1071/AR9781281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lila ZA, Mohammed N, Yasui T, Kurokawa Y, Kanda S, Itabashi H (2004) Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. J Anim Sci 82:1847–1854

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett DK, Stack LJ, Lovell S, Callan J, Flynn B, Hawkins M et al (2005) Manipulating enteric methane emissions and animal performance of late-lactation dairy cows through concentrate supplementation at pasture. J Dairy Sci 88:2836–2842

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machmüller A, Ossowski DA, Wanner M, Kruezer M (1998) Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (RUSITEC). Anim Feed Sci Technol 71:117–130. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00126-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machmüller A, Ossowski DA, Kreuzer M (2000) Comparative evaluation of the effects of coconut oil, oilseeds and crystalline fat on methane release, digestion and energy balance in lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 85:41–60. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00126-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machmüller A, Soliva CR, Kreuzer M (2003) Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion. Br J Nutr 90:529–540. doi:10.1079/BJN2003932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers JC, Miller EI (1982) Some effects of chloral hydrate on rumen fermentation and digestion in sheep. J Agric Sci 99:215–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison GW, Okine EK, McAllister TA, Dong Y, Galbraith J, Dmytruk OIN (1998) Reducing methane emissions from ruminant animals. J Appl Anim Res 14:1–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey WP, Wittenberg K, Corrigan D (1997) Methane production by steers on pasture. Can J Anim Sci 77:519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates T, Colombatto D (2004) Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid. J Anim Sci 82:3346–3356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks G, Bates J (1999) Cost effectiveness of options for reducing UK methane emissions—final report. AEA Technology Environment, Oxfordshire, UK

  • Mohammed N, Lila ZA, Ajisaka N, Hara K, Mikuni K, Kanda S et al (2004) Inhibition of ruminal microbial methane production by beta-cyclodextrin iodopropane, malate and their combination in vitro. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 88(5–6):188–195. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00456.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moss AR, Newbold CJ (2000) The impact of hexose partitioning on methane production in vitro. Reprod Nutr Dev 40(2):201–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss AR, Newbold CJ, Givens DI (2001) The impact of hexose partitioning in sheep in vivo. In: Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 157 pp

  • Mwenya B, Santosa Sar C, Gamo Y, Kobayashi T, Takahashi J (2004) Effects of including beta 1-4 galacto-oligosaccharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 115:313–326. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold CJ (2003) Probiotics. Principles for use in ruminant nutrition. In: van Vuuren AM (ed) The role of probiotics in animal nutrition and their link to the demands of European consumers. TNO Publications, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold CJ, Lassalas B, Jouany JP (1995a) The importance of methanogenesis associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol 21:230–234. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01048.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB, McIntosh FM (1995b) Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in-vitro and in sheep. J Anim Sci 73:1811–1818

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold CI, McIntosh FM, Wallace RJ (1998) Changes in the microbial population of a rumen simulating fermenter in response to yeast culture. Can J Anim Sci 78:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly JC, Spiers WW (1992) Effect of momensin on methane and heat productions of steers fed lucerne hay. Aust J Agric Res 43:1789–1793. doi:10.1071/AR9921789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omar JA (2004) Effect of different ionophore treatments on some rumen metabolic measures of steers. Dirasat Agric Sci 31:178–184

    Google Scholar 

  • PGgRC (2004) The pastoral greenhouse gas research strategy. Annual report to the crown on progress. Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium, Wellington, New Zealand

  • PGgRC (2005) The New Zealand pastoral greenhouse gas research strategy. 2nd Annual report to the crown on progress. Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Puchala R, Min BR, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T (2005) The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. J Anim Sci 83:182–186

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranilla MJ, Morgavi DP, Journay JP (2004) Effect of time after defaunation on methane production in vitro. Reprod Nutr Dev Suppl 1:S35–S36

    Google Scholar 

  • Raun AP (1990) Rumensin “then and now”. In: Rumensin in the 1990s. Elanco Animal Health, Indianapolis, pp A1–A20 (cited by NRC (1996) Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th edn. National Academy Press, Washington)

  • Santoso B, Kume S, Nonaka K, Kimura K, Mizukoshi H, Gamo Y et al (2003) Methane emission, nutrient digestibility, energy metabolism and blood metabolites in dairy cows fed silages with and without galacto-oligosaccharides supplementation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 16:534–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer MS, Hoover W, Sniffen CJ (1974) Effects of ruminal methane inhibitoron growth and energy metabolism in ovine. J Anim Sci 38:908–914

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheehle EA, Kruger D (2006) Global anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Energy J Spec Issue 3:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu Q, Gill HS, Hennessy DW, Leng RA, Bird SH, Rowe JB (1999) Immunization against lactic acidosis in cattle. Res Vet Sci 67:65–71. doi:10.1053/rvsc.1998.0284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slyter LL (1979) Monensin and dichloroacetamide influences on methane and volatile fatty acid production by rumen bacteria in vitro. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:283–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teferedegne B, McIntosh F, Osuji PO, Odenyo A, Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ (1999) Influence of foliage from different accessions of the sub-tropical leguminous tree, Sesbania sesban, on ruminal protozoa in Ethiopia and Scottish sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 78:11–20. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00272-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins NW, Hunter RA (2003) Methane mitigation in beef cattle using a patented antimethanogen. In: Eckard R (ed) Proceedings: 2nd joint Australia and New Zealand forum on Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. CRC for Greenhouse Accounting, Canberra

  • Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Shelton ID, Walker CF (2002) Seasonal variation in methane emission from dairy cows and breeding ewes grazing ryegrass/white clover pasture in New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 45:217–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1979) Effect of monensin on some rumen fermentation parameters. Ann Rech Vet 10(2–3):338–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1996) Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42:73–97. doi:10.1007/BF00394043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O & B Books Inc, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Walichnowski Z, Lawrence SG (1982) Studies into the effects of cadmium and low pH upon methane production. Hydrobiologia 91–92:1573–5117

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ (1993) Rumen fermentation and its manipulation: the development of yeast cultures as feed additives. In: Lyons TP (ed) Biotechnology in the feed industry. Alltech Technical Publications, Nicholasville, Kentucky, pp 173–192

  • Woodward S (2003) Methane—is it all just ‘hot air’? http://www.dexcel.co.nz/data/usr/ACF9B9.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2006

  • Wright AD, Kennedy P, O’Neill CJ, Toovey AF, Popovski S, Rea SM et al (2004) Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22:3976–3985. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan T, Agnew RE, Gordon FJ, Porter MG (2000) Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage based diets. Livest Prod Sci 64:253–263. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00145-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng HC, Liu JX, Yao JH, Yuan Q, Ye HW, Ye JA et al (2005) Effects of dietary sources of vegetable oils on performance of high-yielding lactating cows and conjugated linoleic acid in milk. J Dairy Sci 88:2037–2042

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30530560) for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Yun Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iqbal, M.F., Cheng, YF., Zhu, WY. et al. Mitigation of ruminant methane production: current strategies, constraints and future options. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24, 2747–2755 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9819-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9819-y

Keywords

Navigation