Skip to main content
Log in

Separation of yeasts by addition of flocculent cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Separation of yeast cells using a co-flocculation process was investigated. Co-flocculation is a fast process (within few minutes), occurs in a broad pH range (3.0–8.0) and requires a small amount of calcium (0.1 mM). Agitation affects yeast aggregation; however, an agitation between 60 rev/min and 160 rev/min has only a little influence on the co-flocculation process. The ratio flocculent/non-flocculent cells that induced the settling of 50 and 90% of the cells of S. cerevisiae was 1:7 and 1:1, respectively. Separation of non-flocculent cells can be carried out at any time of the growth cycle. No difference in the efficiency of co-flocculation carried out in buffer (pH 4.0 with 10 mM calcium) or in 48 h-fermented broth was observed. Flocculent cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae had the ability to sediment non-flocculent cells of S. cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus, which shows the suitability of the co-flocculation process for separation of different kinds of non-flocculent cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brányik T, Vicente AA, Machado-Cruz JM et al (2001) Spent grains—a new support for brewing yeast immobilization. Biotechnol Lett 23:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer RR, Dunlop EH (1991) High gradient magnetic separation of yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:1021–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demain AL, Phaff HJ, Kurtzman CP (1998) The industrial and agricultural significance of yeasts. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds) The yeasts a taxonomic study. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSousa SR, Laluce C, Jafelicci M (2006) Effect of organic and inorganic additives on flotation recovery of washed cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resuspended in water. Colloid Surface B 48:77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatti-Kaul R, Mattiasson B (2001) Downstream processing in biotechnology. In: Ratledge C, Kristiasen B (eds) Basic biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilge-Rotmann B, Rehm H-J (1991) Relationship between fermentation capability and fatty acid composition of free and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:502–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jirkû V (1995) Covalent immobilization as a stimulus of cell wall composition changes. Experientia 51:569–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-S, Akeprathumchai S, Wickramasinghe SR (2001) Flocculation to enhance microfiltration. J Membrane Sci 182:161–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klis FM (1994) Review: cell wall assembly in yeast. Yeast 10:851–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miki BLA, Poon NH, James AP et al (1982) Possible mechanism for flocculation interactions governed by gene FLO1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 150:878–889

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton S, D’Amore T (1994) Physiological effects of yeast cell immobilization: applications for brewing. Enzyme Micro Technol 16:365–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parascandola P, De Alteriis E, Sentandreu R (1997) Immobilization and ethanol stress induce the same molecular response at the level of the cell wall in growing yeast. FEMS Microbiol Lett 150:121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington PH, Margaritis A, Mensour NA et al (1998) Fundamentals of immobilized yeast cells for continuous beer fermentation: a review. J Inst Brew 104:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder DS, Masschelein CA (1985) The growth process of brewing yeast and the biotechnological challenge. J Am Soc Brew Chem 43:66–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen H-Y, Moonjai N, Vestrepen KJ et al (2003) Impact of attachment immobilization on yeast physiology and fermentation performance. J Am Soc Brew Chem 61:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares EV, DeConinck G, Duarte F et al (2002) Use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Cu2+ removal from solution: the advantages of using a flocculent strain. Biotechnol Lett 24:663–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares EV, Mota M (1996) Flocculation onset, growth-phase and genealogical age in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can J Microbiol 42:539–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares EV, Seynaeve J (2000) Induction of flocculation of brewer’s yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by changing the calcium concentration and pH of culture medium. Biotechnol Lett 22:1827–1832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares EV, Teixeira JA, Mota M (1992) Interaction between flocculent and nonflocculent cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can J Microbiol 38:969–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford M (1992) Yeast flocculation: a new perspective. Adv Microb Physiol 33:1–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford M, Assinder S (1991) Yeast flocculation: Flo1 and NewFlo phenotypes and receptor structure. Yeast 7:559–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford M, Bond CJ (1992) Selective separation of microorganisms by lectins: yeast and concanavalin A as a model system. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:835–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor NW, Orton WL (1975) Calcium in flocculence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Inst Brew 81:53–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volesky B, May-Philips HA (1995) Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 42:797–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlow AC (1985) Practical statistics for experimental biologists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks MG, Munro PA, Spedding PL (1983) New concepts for rapid yeast settling. I. Flocculation with an inert powder. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:687–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir S, Ramsden DK, Hughes J et al (1993) The flocculation of yeast with chitosan in complex fermentation media: the effect of biomass concentration and mode of flocculant addition. Biotechnol Lett 7:199–204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Annelies Mortier (KaHo St.-Lieven, Gent, Belgium) wishes to thank Dr C. Van Keer, for the opportunity to participate in the ERASMUS bilateral agreement program between their school and ISEP (Portugal).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo V. Soares.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortier, A., Soares, E.V. Separation of yeasts by addition of flocculent cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23, 1401–1407 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9379-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9379-6

Keywords

Navigation