Abstract
Wetland managers in North America spend a great deal of time and money trying to control invasive Phragmites australis. Accurate mapping with remote sensing imagery is key to these efforts, which are increasingly employing uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. We mapped P. australis on the Crow Island State Game Area using UAV-derived single-date and multi-date RGB imagery combined with a Digital Surface Model (DSM). In addition to a traditional maximum likelihood classification (MLC), we used two machine-learning (ML) classification algorithms: support vector machine (SVM) and neural network (NN). We assessed accuracy based on both the traditional global model (overall accuracy [OA], omission [OE] and commission [CE] errors for the Phragmites class, and Kappa statistic) and local, per-patch accuracy broken down across 5 density classes and 3 size classes. Our global accuracy assessment for single-date imagery found that SVM (72% OA, 10% OE, 16% CE) performed similar to MLC (70% OA, 17% OE, 8% CE), while NN (33% OA, 7% OE, 41% CE) performed worse. The use of multi-date imagery had little effect on accuracy (MLC 64% OA, 21% OE, 12% CE; SVM 71% OA, 11% OE, 17% CE) except with NN, where the additional bands led to much higher accuracy (67% OA, 7% OE, 22% CE). These results were largely mirrored in the per-patch accuracy assessment, where SVM performed slightly better than MLC and NN performed poorly due to high commission errors. Regarding patch size and density, both larger and medium sized patches, as well as denser patches, were identified relatively accurately, but smaller patches tended to be overestimated and lower-density patches exhibited high omission errors. These results show that wetland managers can achieve very acceptable mapping accuracies with simple methods that require little in the way of resources and expertise.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data used in this paper are available upon reasonable request by emailing the Corresponding author.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abeysinghe T, Milas AS, Arend K, Hohman B, Reil P, Gregory A, Vazquez-Ortega A (2019) Mapping invasive Phragmites australis in the old woman Creek Estuary using UAV remote sensing and machine learning classifiers. Remote Sens 11:1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111380
Artigas F, Pechmann IC (2010) Balloon imagery verification of remotely sensed Phragmites australis expansion in an Urban Estuary of New Jersey, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 95(3):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.007
Arzandeh S, Wang J (2003) Monitoring the change of phragmites distribution using satellite data. Can J Remote Sens 29(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.5589/m02-077
Bachmann CM, Donato TF, Lamela GM, Rhea WJ, Bettenhausen MH, Fusina RA, Du Bois KR, Porter JH, Truitt BR (2002) Automatic classification of land Cover on Smith island, VA, using HyMAP imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(10):2313–2330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.804834
Becker BL, Lusch DP, Qi J (2007) A classification-based assessment of the optimal spectral and spatial resolutions for great lakes coastal wetland imagery. Remote Sens Environ 108(1):111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.005
Borgeau-Chavez LL, Miller N, Riordan K, Nowels M (2004) Remotely monitoring great lakes coastal wetlands using a hybrid radar and multi-spectral sensor approach. (Project No. WETLANDS-EPA-06).
Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Lopez RD, Trebitz A, Hollenhorst T, Host GE, Huberty B, Gauthier RL, Hummer J (2008a) Great lakes coastal wetlands monitoring plan. https://www.greatlakeswetlands.org/Home.vbhtml. Accessed 18 February 2021
Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Riordan K, Mille N, Nowels M, Powell R (2008b) Remotely monitoring great lakes coastal wetlands with multi-sensor, multi-temporal SAR, and multi-spectral data. 2008 IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4778886
Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Riordan K, Powell RB, Miller N, Nowels M (2009) Improving wetland characterization with multi-sensor, multi-temporal SAR and optical/infrared data fusion. In: Jedlovec G (ed) Advances in geoscience and remote sensing. InTech Publishers, India, pp 679–708. https://doi.org/10.5772/8327
Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Kowalski KP, Mazur MLC, Scarbrough KA, Powell RB, Brooks CN, Huberty B, Jenkins LK, Banda EC, Galbraith DM, Lauback ZM, Riordan K (2013) Mapping Invasive Phragmites australis in the coastal great lakes with ALOS PALSAR satellite imagery for decision support. J Great Lakes Res 39(Supplement 1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2012.11.001
Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Endres S, Battaglia M, Miller ME, Banda E, Laubach Z, Higman P, Chow-Fraser P, Maraccio J (2015) Development of a Bi-national great lakes coastal wetland and land use map using three-season PALSAR and landsat imagery. Remote Sens 7(7):8655–8682. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70708655
Brooks C, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Serocki E, Grimm A, Endres S, Carlson J, Wang F (2015) Implementing practical field and remote sensing methods to inform adaptive management of non-native Phragmites australis in the Midwest. University of Michigan Water Center. https://mtri.org/assets/UMWaterCenterPhragmites/update_finalreport/AdaptiveManagementPhragmites_Report_MTRIv8c_Final.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
Brooks C, Weinstein C, Poley A, Grimm A, Marion N, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Hansen D, Kowalski K (2021) Using uncrewed aerial vehicles for identifying the extent of invasive Phragmites australis in treatment areas enrolled in an adaptive management program. Remote Sens 13(10):1895. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13101895
Chambers RM, Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K (1999) Expansion of Phragmites australis into Tidal wetlands of North America. Aquat Bot 64(3–4):261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00055-8
Congalton RG, Oderwald RG, Mead RA (1983) Assessing landsat classification accuracy using discreet multivariate analysis and statistical techniques. Photogramm Eng Rem S 49(12):1671–1678
Ghioca-Robrecht DM, Johnston C, Tulbure MG (2008) Assessing the use of Multiseason Quickbird Imagery for mapping invasive species in a Lake Erie Coastal Marsh. Wetlands 28(4):1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1672/08-34.1
Gilmore MS, Wilson EH, Barrett N, Civco DL, Prisloe S, Hurd JD, Chadwick C (2008) Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower connecticut River Tidal Marsh. Remote Sens Environ 112(11):4048–4060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.020
Hudon C, Gagnon P, Jean M (2005) Hydrological factors controlling the spread of common reed (Phragmites australis) in the St. Lawrence River (Quebec, Canada). Ecoscience 12(3):347–357. https://doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-12-3-347.1
Husson E, Hagner O, Ecke F (2014) Unmanned aircraft systems help to map aquatic vegetation. Appl Veg Sci 17(3):567–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12072
Kaneko K, Nohara S (2014) Review of effective vegetation mapping using the UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) method. J Geogr Inf Syst 6(6):733–742. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2014.66060
Labda M, Smith S, Sullivan P, Philpot W, Baveye P (2007) Influence of Wavelet Type on the classification of Marsh vegetation from satellite imagery using a combination of wavelet texture and statistical component Analyses. Can J Remote Sens 33(4):260–265. https://doi.org/10.5589/m07-034
Labda M, Downs R, Smith S, Welsh S, Neider C, White S, Richmond M, Philpot W, Baveye P (2008) Mapping invasive wetland plants in the Hudson river National Estuarine Research reserve using quickbird satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 112(1):286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.05.003
Labda M, Blair B, Downs R, Monger B, Philpot W, Smith S, Sullivan P, Baveye PC (2010) Use of textural measurements to map invasive wetland plants in the Hudson river National Estuarine Research Reserve with IKONOS satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 114(4):876–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.002
Lantz NJ, Wang J (2013) Object-based classification of worldview-2 imagery for mapping invasive common reed Phragmites Australis. Can J Remote Sens 39(4):328–340. https://doi.org/10.5589/m13-041
Liu H, Meng X, Jiang T, Liu X, Zhang A (2016) Change detection of Phragmites australis distribution in the detroit wildlife refuge based on an iterative intersection analysis algorithm. Sustainability 8(3):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030264
Lopez RD, Edmonds CM, Neale AC, Slonecker T, Jones KB, Heggem DT, Lyon JG, Jaworski E, Garofalo D, Williams D (2004) Chapter 18: accuracy assessments of airborne hyperspectral data for mapping opportunistic plant species in freshwater coastal wetlands. In: Lunetta RS, Lyon JG (eds) Remote sensing and GIS accuracy assessment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 253–267
Lopez RD, Heggem DT, Sutton D, Ehli R, Van Remortel R, Evanson E, Bice L (2006) Chapter 4: Using a landscape approach for monitoring invasive and opportunistic plant species in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands. In using landscape metrics to develop indicators of great lakes coastal wetland condition. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. EPA/600/X-06/002.
Maheu-Giroux M, de Blois S (2005) Mapping the invasive species Phragmites australis in linear wetland corridors. Aquat Bot 83(4):310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.07.002
Marcaccio JV, Chow-Fraser P (2016) Mapping options to track invasive Phragmites australis in the Great Lakes Basin in Canada. In: Gastescu P, Bretcan P (Eds) 3rd international conference—water resources and wetlands. pp 75–82.
Markle CE, Chow-Fraser P (2018) Effects of European common reed on Blanding’s turtle spatial ecology. J Wildl Manag 82(4):857–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21435
Meneses NC, Baier S, Geist J, Schneider T (2017) Evaluation of green-LiDAR data for mapping extent, density and height of aquatic Reed Beds at Lake Chiemsee. Bavaria—Germany Remote Sens 9(12):1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121308
Meneses NC, Baier S, Reidelsturz P, Geist J, Schneider T (2018a) Modelling heights of sparse aquatic reed (Phragmites australis) using structure from motion point clouds derived from Rotary- and fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data. Limnologica 72:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2018.07.001
Meneses NC, Brunner F, Baier S, Geist J, Schneider T (2018b) Quantification of extent, density, and status of aquatic reed beds using point clouds derived from UAV-RGB imagery. Remote Sens 10(12):1869. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121869
Pengra BW, Johnston CA, Loveland TR (2007) Mapping an invasive plant, Phragmites australis, in coastal wetlands using the EO-1 hyperion hyperspectral sensor. Remote Sens Environ 108(1):74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.002
Quirion B, Simek Z, Davalos A, Blossey B (2018) Management of invasive Phragmites australis in the Adirondacks: a Cautionary Tale about Prospects of Eradication. Biol Invasions 20:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1513-2
Rice D, Rooth J, Stevenson JC (2000) Colonization and Expansion of Phragmites australis in Upper Chesapeake Bay Tidal Marshes. Wetlands 20(2):280–299. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0280:CAEOPA]2.0.CO;2
Robichaud CD, Rooney RC (2017) Long-term Effects of a Phragmites australis Invasion on Birds in a Lake Erie Coastal Marsh. J Great Lakes Res 43:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2017.03.018
Rupasinghe PA, Chow-Fraser P (2019) Identification of most spectrally distinguishable phenological stage of invasive Phragmites australis in Lake Erie wetlands (Canada) for accurate mapping using multispectral satellite imagery. Wetl Ecol Manag 27:513–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-019-09675-2
Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(4):2445–2449. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032477999
Samiappan S, Turnage G, Hathcock LA, Casagrande L, Stinson P, Moorhead R (2017a) Using unmanned aerial vehicles for high-resolution remote sensing to map invasive Phragmites australis in coastal wetlands. Int J Remote Sens 38(8–10):2199–2217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1239288
Samiappan S, Turnage G, Hathcock LA, Moorhead R (2017b) Mapping of invasive phragmites (common reed) in gulf of mexico coastal wetlands using multispectral imagery and small unmanned aerial systems. Int J Remote Sens 38(8–10):2861–2882. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1271480
Warren RS, Fell PE, Grimsby JL, Buck EL, Rilling GC, Fertik RA (2001) Rates, patterns, and impacts of Phragmites australis expansion and effects of experimental Phragmites control on vegetation, macroinvertebrates, and fish within tidelands of the lower connecticut river. Estuaries 24(1):90–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352816
Wilcox KL, Petrie SA, Maynard LA, Meyer SW (2003) Historical Distribution and Abundance of Phragmites australis at Long Point, Lake Erie Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 29(4):664–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70469-9
Xie Y, Zhang A, Welsh W (2015) Mapping Wetlands and Phragmites using publicly available remotely sensed images. Photogramm Eng Rem S 81(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.1.69
Zaman B, Jensen AM, McKee M (2011) Use of high-resolution multispectral imagery acquired with an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle to quantify the spread of an invasive wetland species. 2011 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium. Vancouver, British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6049252
Zaman B, McKee M (2020) Smart tools for wetland management: UAV data and artificial intelligence technique for change detection of Phragmites australis in the bear river migratory bird refuge. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 8(6):387–395. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-8-6-9
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Ruth and Ted Braun Fellowship Program at Saginaw Valley State University for funding this research. We would also like to thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for access to the Crow Island State Game Area, where this work was conducted. Finally, we would like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose input greatly improved this paper.
Funding
This research was supported by the Ruth and Ted Braun Fellowship program at Saginaw Valley State University, grant number 18-bb-04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This study was conceived and designed by RM. Both authors contributed equally to data collection and analysis. RM wrote the first draft of the manuscript body, while JM prepared the first draft of the tables and figures. Both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript, and both authors read and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohler, R.L., Morse, J.M. Using UAV imagery to map invasive Phragmites australis on the Crow Island State Game Area, Michigan, USA. Wetlands Ecol Manage 30, 1213–1229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09890-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09890-4