Abstract
As most ecosystems, peatlands have been heavily exploited for different human purposes. For example, in Finland the majority is under forestry, agriculture or peat mining use. Peatlands play an important role in carbon storage, water cycle, and are a unique habitat for rare organisms. Such properties highlight their environmental importance and the need for their restoration. To monitor the success of peatland restoration sensitive indicators are needed. Here we test whether testate amoebae can be used as a reliable bioindicator for assessing peatland condition. To qualify as reliable indicators, responses in testate amoebae community structure to ecological changes must be stronger than random spatial and temporal variation. In this study, we simultaneously assessed differences between the effects of seasonality, intermediate scale spatial variation and land uses on living testate amoebae assemblages in natural, forested and restored peatlands. We expected the effects of seasonality on testate amoebae communities to be less pronounced than those of land use and within site variation. On average, natural sites harboured the highest richness and density, while the lowest numbers were found at forestry sites. Despite small changes observed in taxa dominance and differences in TA community structure between seasons and years at some sites, spatial heterogeneity, temperature, pH, nor water table depth seemed to significantly affect testate amoebae communities. Instead, observed differences were related to type of land use, which explained 75% of the community variation. Our results showed that testate amoebae community monitoring is a useful tool to evaluate impacts of human land use on boreal peatlands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Aapala K, Heikkilä R, Lindholm T (1996) Protecting the diversity of Finnish mires. In: Vasander H (ed) Peatlands in Finland. Finnish Peatland Society, Jyväskylä, pp 45–57
Barber KE (1993) Peatlands as scientific archives of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 2:474–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056743
Bobrov AA, Charman DJ, Warner BG (1999) Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) on peatlands in western Russia with special attention to niche separation in closely related taxa. Protist 150:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1434-4610(99)70016-7
Bobrov AA, Charman DJ, Warner BG (2002) Ecology of testate amoebae from oligotrophic peatlands: specific features of polytypic and polymorphic species. Biol Bull 29:605–617. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021732412503
Booth RK (2001) Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa) in two lake superior coastal wetlands: implications for paleoecology and environmental monitoring. Wetlands 21:564–576. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0564:EOTAPI]2.0.CO;2
Booth RK (2002) Testate amoebae as paleoindicators of surface-moisture changes on Michigan peatlands: modern ecology and hydrological calibration. J Paleolimnol 28:329–348. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021675225099
Booth RK, Zygmunt JR (2005) Biogeography and comparative ecology of testate amoebae inhabiting Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in Great Lakes and Rocky Mountain regions of North America. Diversity Distrib 11:577–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00154.x
Booth RK, Lamentowicz M, Charman DJ (2010) Preparation and analysis of testate amoebae in peatland palaeoenvironmental studies. Mires Peat 7:1–7
Chapman S, Buttler A, Francez AJ, Laggoun-Défarge F, Vasander H, Schloter M, Combe J, Grosvernier P, Harms H, Epron D, Gilbert D, Mitchell E (2003) Exploitation of northern peatlands and biodiversity maintenance: a conflict between economy and ecology. Front Ecol Environ 1:525–532. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0525:EONPAB]2.0.CO;2
Charman DJ (1999) Testate amoebae and the fossil record: issues in biodiversity. J Biogeogr 26(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00286.x
Charman DJ (2001) Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental applications of testate amoebae. Quat Sci Rev 20:1753–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00036-1
Charman DJ, Warner BG (1992) Relationship between testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) and microenvironmental parameters on a forested peatland in northeastern Ontario. Can J Zool 70:2474–2482. https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-331
Charman DJ, Hendon D, Woodland WA (2000) The identification of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in peats. Technical Guide No. 9. Quaternary Research Association, London
Choi YD (2004) Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward “futuristic” restoration. Ecol Res 19:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00594_19_1.x
Clarke KJ (2003) Guide to the identification of soil Protozoa—Testate Amoebae, Report No. 4. Soil Biodiversity Programme Research, Fresh Water Biological Association, Ambleside
Daza Secco E, Haapalehto T, Haimi J, Meissner K, Tahvanainen T (2016) Do testate amoebae communities recover in concordance with vegetation after restoration of drained peatlands? Mires and Peat 18(12):1–14. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2016.OMB.231
Finlay BJ, Fenchel T (2004) Cosmopolitan metapopulations of free-living microbial eukaryotes. Protist 155(2):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1078/1434-4610-00179
Finlay BJ, Esteban GF, Clarke KJ, Olmo JL (2001) Biodiversity of terrestrial protozoa appears homogeneous across local and global spatial scales. Protist 152:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1078/1434-4610-00073
Fournier B, Malysheva E, Mazei Y, Moretti M, Mitchell EAD (2012) Toward the use of testate amoebae functional traits as indicator of floodplain restoration success. Eur J Soil Biol 49:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.05.008
Francez AJ, Gogo S, Josselin N (2000) Distribution of potential CO2 and CH4 productions, denitrification and microbial biomass C and N in the profile of a restored peatland in Brittany (France). Eur J Soil Biol 36:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(00)01057-8
Galka M, Miotk-Szpiganowicz G, Goslar T, Jęśko M, van der Knaap WO, Lamentowicz M (2012) Palaeohydrology, fires and vegetation succession in the southern Baltic during the last 7500 years reconstructed from a raised bog based on multi-proxy data. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 370:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.12.011
Gałka M, Tobolski K, Górska A, Lamentowicz M (2017) Resilience of plant and testate amoeba communities after climatic and anthropogenic disturbances in a Baltic bog in Northern Poland: implications for ecological restoration. Holocene 27:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616652704
Gilbert D, Mitchell EAD (2006) Chapter 13: Microbial diversity in Sphagnum peatlands. In: Martini IP, Martinez Cortizas A, Cheswroth W (eds) Developments in earth surface processes. Elsevier, Paris, pp 287–318
Gilbert D, Amblard C, Bourdier G, Francez AJ (1998) The microbial loop at the surface of a peatland: structure, function, and impact of nutrient input. Microb Ecol 35:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900062
Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941811
Graae BJ, De Frenne P, Kolb A, Brunet J, Chabrerie O, Verheyen K, Pepin N, Heinken T, Zobel M, Shevtsova A, Nijs I, Milbau A (2012) On the use of weather data in ecological studies along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. Oikos 121:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19694.x
Haapalehto T, Vasander H, Jauhianen S, Tahvanainen T, Kotiaho JS (2011) The effects of peatland restoration on water-table depth, elemental concentrations, and vegetation: 10 years of changes. Restor Ecol 19:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00704.x
Hartman WH, Richardson CJ, Vilgalys R, Bruland GL (2008) Environmental and anthropogenic controls over bacterial communities in wetland soils. PNAS 105(46):17842–17847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808254105
Hecke Van (2013) Power study of anova versus Kruskal–Wallis test. J Stat Manag Syst 15(2–3):241–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2012.10701623
Hedberg P, Kotowski W, Saetre P, Mälson K, Rydin H, Sundberg S (2012) Vegetation recovery after multiple-site experimental fen restorations. Biol Conserv 147(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.039
Hui FKC, Taskinen S, Pledger S, Foster SD, Warton D (2015) Model-based approach to unconstrained ordination. Methods Ecol Evol 6:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12236
Jauhiainen S (2002) Testacean amoebae in different types of mire following drainage and subsequent restoration. Eur J Protistol 38:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1078/0932-4739-00748
Koenig I, Feldmeyer-Christe E, Mitchell EAD (2015) Comparative ecology of vascular plants, bryophyte and testate amoebae communities in four Sphagnum peatlands along an altitudinal gradient in Switzerland. Ecol Indic 54:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.043
Laine AM, Leppälä M, Tarvainen O, Päätalo ML, Seppänen R, Tolvanen A (2011) Restoration of managed pine fens: effect on hydrology and vegetation. Appl Veg Sci 14(3):340–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01123.x
Lamentowicz L, Gabka M, Rusinska A, Sobczyńsky T, Owsianny PM, Lamentowicz M (2011) Testate amoeba (Arcellinida, Euglyphida) Ecology along a poor-rich gradient in fens of western Poland. Int Rev Hydrobiol 96:356–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201111357
Lamentowicz M, Bragazza L, Buttler A, Jassey VEJ, Mitchell EAD (2013) Seasonal patterns of testate amoeba diversity, community structure and species–environment relationships in four Sphagnum-dominated peatlands along a 1300 m altitudinal gradient in Switzerland. Soil Biol Biochem 67:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.002
Lappalainen E (1996) General view on world peatland and peat resources. In: Lappalainen E (ed) Global peat resources. International Peat Society, Jyväskylä, pp 53–56
Lunn A, Burlton B (2013) The border mires: a completed peatland restoration project. British Wildlife 24:153–160
Marcisz K, Lamentowicz L, Slowinska S, Slowinski M, Muszak W, Lamentowicz M (2014) Seasonal changes in Sphagnum peatland testate amoeba communities along a hydrological gradient. Eur J Protistol 50:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2014.07.001
Marcisz K, Colombaroli D, Jassey VE, Tinner W, Kolaczek P, Galka M, Karpinska-Kolaczek M, Slowinski M, Lamentowicz M (2016) A novel testate amoebae trait-based approach to infer environmental disturbance in Sphagnum peatlands. Sci Rep 6:33907. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33907
Mazei Y, Tsyganov A (2006) Freshwater testate amoebae. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow (in Russian)
Meisterfeld R (2002) Order Arcellinida Kent, 1880. In: Lee JJ, Leedale GF, Bradbury P (eds) The Illustrated guide to the Protozoa, vol 2. Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence, pp 827–860
Mitchell EAD, Buttler A, Grosvernier P, Rydin H, Hoosbeek MR, Greenup A, Saarinen T (1999) Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa) on peatlands in the Jura mountains, Switzerland and France. Ecoscience 6:565–576
Mitchell EAD, Buttler AJ, Grosvernier P et al (2000a) Relationships among testate amoebae (Protozoa), vegetation and water chemistry in five Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in Europe. New Phytol 145:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00550.x
Mitchell EAD, Borcard D, Buttler AJ, Grosvernier Ph, Gilbert DJM (2000b) Horizontal distribution patterns of testate amoebae (Protozoa) in a Sphagnum magellanicum carpet. Microb Ecol 39:290–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900187
Mitchell EAD, Bragazza L, Gerdol R (2004) Testate amoebae (Protista) communities in Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) B.S.G. (Bryophyta): relationships with altitude, and moss elemental chemistry. Protist 155:423–436. https://doi.org/10.1078/1434461042650334
Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comin FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10:e1001247
Oja H, Randles RH (2004) Multivariate nonparametric tests. Stat Sci 19:598–605. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000558
Poulin M, Andersen R, Rochefort L (2013) A new approach for tracking vegetation change after restoration: a case study with peatlands. Restor Ecol 21(3):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00889.x
Schönborn W (1986) Population dynamics and production biology of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda, Testacea) in raw humus of two coniferous forest soils. Arch Protistenkunde 132:325–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(86)80027-6
Shannon C, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Sleigh MA (1989) Protozoa and other protists, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London
Stockmarr J (1971) Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen Spores 13:615–621
Talbot J, Richard PJH, Roulet NT, Booth RK (2010) Assessing long-term hydrological and ecological responses to drainage in a raised bog using paleoecology and a hydrosequence. J Veg Sci 21:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01128.x
Tolonen K (1986) Rhizopod analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of the holocene paleoecology and paleohydrology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 645–666
Tsyganov AN, Milbau A, Beyenes L (2013) Environmental factors influencing soil testate amoebae in herbaceous and shrubby vegetation along an altitudinal gradient in subarctic tundra (Abisko, Sweden). Eur J Protistol 49(2):238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.08.004
Vasander H, Tuittila E, Lode E et al (2003) Status and restoration of peatlands in northern Europe. Wet Ecol Manag 11:5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022061622602
Wanner M, Xylander WER (2005) Biodiversity development of terrestrial testate amoebae: is there any succession at all? Biol Fertil Soils 41:428–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0850-y
Warner BG, Asada T, Quinn NP (2007) Seasonal influences on the ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa) in a small Sphagnum peatland in Southern Ontario, Canada. Microb Ecol 54:91–100
Warton DI, Guillaume Blanchet F, O’Hara R, Ovaskainen O, Taskinen S, Walker SC, Hui FKC (2015) So many variables: joint modelling in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 30:766–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007
Wookey PA, Aerts R, Bardgett RD, Baptist F, Bråthen KA, Cornelissen JHC, Gough L, Hartley IP, Hopkins DW, Lavorel S, Shaver GR (2009) Ecosystem feedbacks and cascade processes: understanding their role in the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to environmental change. Glob Change Biol 15:1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01801.x
Wortley L, Hero JM, Howes M (2013) Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor Ecol 21:537–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028
Yu ZC (2011) Holocene carbon flux histories of the world’s peatlands. Holocene 21(5):761–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683610386982
Yu ZC (2012) Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review. Biogeosciences 9:4071–4085. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012
Zedler JB, Callaway JC (1999) Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.x
Acknowledgements
We thank Yuri Mazei for his guidance on testate amoebae taxonomy and Merle Pöntynen for her valuable work in the field. Emmanuela Daza Secco thanks the Maj and Tor Nessling foundation (Grant No. 2013400) for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daza Secco, E., Haimi, J., Högmander, H. et al. Testate amoebae community analysis as a tool to assess biological impacts of peatland use. Wetlands Ecol Manage 26, 597–611 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-018-9594-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-018-9594-y