Skip to main content

Inefficacy of wetland legislation for conserving Quebec wetlands as revealed by mapping of recent disturbances

Abstract

To minimize wetland losses, many jurisdictions have adopted a ‘mitigation sequence’ that requires compliance for permit delivery. This study evaluated the outcome of this sequence in the province of Quebec, Canada, during the 3 years following its adoption in 2006. A case study was then conducted in the St. Lawrence Lowlands (29,096 km2) to compare statistics on delivered permits with losses detected by detailed mapping of disturbances from two periods: 1990 to 2011 and 2006 to 2011. A total of 558 permits were issued, most of which (550) represented 2870 ha of disturbed wetlands; the remaining (8) corresponding to restoration projects. The mitigation sequence was applied for 323 of the permits, mainly with compensations. The type of action undertaken was registered for only 63 % of the compensations with a minimal fraction dedicated to wetland restoration (1 ha) and creation (14 ha), resulting in a net loss of 99 % of the impacted wetland areas. In the case study, 56,681 ha (19 %) of wetlands had been disturbed in the last two decades, of which 22,535 ha were disturbed between 2006 and 2011, mainly by agricultural and forestry activities. No permit was delivered for these two activities according to our compilation. The area disturbed following permit deliverance was about 17–30 times smaller than losses estimated by our detailed mapping, depending on the period considered. Preserving wetlands will require not only mandatory compliance with the mitigation sequence but also efforts to subscribe all types of industries to the process of permit delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Airoldi L, Beck MW (2007) Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe. In: Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA, Gordon JDM (eds) Oceanography and marine biology, vol 45. Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 345–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen E, Hanson A (2007) An analysis of wetland policy in Atlantic Canada. Can Water Resour J 32:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen E, Hanson A (2008) Identifying wetland compensation principles and mechanisms for Atlantic Canada using a Delphi approach. Wetlands 28:640–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2011) Wetlands as natural assets. Hydrol Sci J 56:1360–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazoge A (2008) Évaluation des pertes de superficie des milieux humides potentiels dans les Basses-terres du Saint-Laurent. Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, service des écosystèmes et de la biodiversité, p 53

  • Bendor T (2009) A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landsc Urban Plan 89:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernert JA, Eilers JM, Eilers BJ, Blok E, Daggett SG, Bierly KF (1999) Recent wetlands trends (1981/82–1994) in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 19:545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandolin PG, Avalos MA, De Angelo C (2013) The impact of flood control on the loss of wetlands in Argentina. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 23:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazner JC, Tanner DK, Detenbeck NE, Batterman SL, Stark SL, Jagger LA, Snarski VM (2004) Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: general relationships and identification of thresholds. Environ Manag 33:855–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM, Malvarez AI (2002) Temperature freshwater wetlands: types, status, and threats. Environ Conserv 29:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2010) ‘Mitigation banks’ for wetland conservation: a major success or an unmitigated disaster? Wetl Ecol Manag 18:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DA, Cole CA, Brooks RP (2002) A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 10:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare S, Creed IF (2014) Tracking wetland loss to improve evidence-based wetland policy learning and decision making. Wetl Ecol Manag 22:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare S, Krogman N, Foote L, Lemphers N (2011) Where is the avoidance in the implementation of wetland law and policy? Wetl Ecol Manag 19:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JM, Huh OK, Braud D (2008) Wetland loss in world deltas. J Coast Res 24:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res 65:934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, Hussain S, Kumar P, McVittie A, Portela R, Rodriguez LC, ten Brink P, van Beukering P (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detenbeck N, Galatowitsch SM, Atkinson J, Ball H (1999) Evaluating perturbations and developing restoration strategies for inland wetlands in the Great Lakes Basin. Wetlands 19:789–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deslandes S, Grenier M, Bélanger L, Lacroix,G, Zingraff V (2002) The wetland conservation atlas of the St. Lawrence valley produced from decision tree classifications of RADARSAT and Landsat images. In: 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, vol 5. IGARSS ’02, pp 2893–2895

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc (ESRI) (2012). ArcGIS 10.0. Redlands, USA

  • Finlayson CM (2012) Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossey M, Rousseau AN (2016) Can isolated and riparian wetlands mitigate the impact of climate change on watershed hydrology? A case study approach. J Environ Manage (submitted)

  • Fournier R, Poulin M, Revéret JP, Rousseau A, Théau J (2013) Outils d’analyses hydrologique, économique et spatiale des services écologiques procurés par les milieux humides des basses terres du Saint-Laurent: adaptation aux changements climatiques. Rapport final présenté par le Consortium sur la Climatologie Régionale et l’Adaptation aux Changements Climatiques (OURANOS) dans le cadre d’un financement du Fonds Vert du Gouvernement du Québec. Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada, pp 108 + annexes

  • Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 14:314–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimmi U, Lachat T, Burgi M (2011) Reconstructing the collapse of wetland networks in the Swiss lowlands 1850–2000. Landscape Ecol 26:1071–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement du Québec (2015) Rapport sur l’état de l’eau et des écosystèmes aquatiques au Québec. Available online: http://www.mddelcc.gouv.qc.ca/rapportsurleau/Etat-eau-ecosysteme-aquatique-qualite-eau-Quelle-situation_Rivieres-Fleuve.htm. Consulted 14 May 2015

  • Government of Nova Scotia (2011) Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy. Available online: https://www.novascotia.ca/nse/wetland/conservation.policy.asp. Consulted 16 Feb 2016

  • Gratton L (2010) Plan de conservation de la Vallée du Saint-Laurent et du Lac Champlain, région du Québec. Conservation de la Nature, p 170

  • Gundersen P, Laurén A, Finér L, Ring E, Koivusalo H, Sætersdal M, Weslien JO, Sigurdsson B, Högbom L, Laine J, Hansen K (2010) Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the Nordic Countries. AMBIO J Hum Environ 39:555–566

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland CC, Kentula ME (1992) Impacts of Section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation on wetlands in California (USA). Wetl Ecol Manag 2:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough P, Robertson M (2009) Mitigation under section 404 of the clean water act: where it comes from, what it means. Wetl Ecol Manag 17:15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M (2009) Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: lessons from Canada. Can Public Adm Adm Publique Du Canada 52:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B, Wong CP, Chen Y, Cui L, Ouyang Z (2015) Advancing wetland policies using ecosystem services—China’s way out. Wetlands 35:983–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobin B, Beaulieu J, Grenier M, Bélanger L, Maisonneuve C, Bordage D, Filion B (2004) Les paysages agricoles du Québec méridional. Le Naturaliste Canadien 128:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CA, Detenbeck NE, Niemi GJ (1990) The cumulative effect of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity: a landscape approach. Biogeochemistry 10:105–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly M, Primeau S, Sager M, Bazoge A (2008) Guide d’élaboration d’un plan de conservation des milieux humides. Ministère du Développement Durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, Québec, p 68

  • Kimmel K, Mander U (2010) Ecosystem services of peatlands: implications for restoration. Prog Phys Geogr 34:491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavallée S (2013) Analyse de l’état actuel du droit et recommandations en vue de l’adoption d’une loi sur la conservation et la gestion durable des milieux humides au Québec. Centre de la Science de la Biodiversité du Québec, p 71 + annexes. Available online: http://www.mddelcc.gouv.qc.ca/eau/rives/milieuxhumides.htm

  • Létourneau G, Jean M (2006) Cartographie par télédétection des milieux humides du Saint-Laurent. Environment Canada, Report ST-239, Direction générale des sciences et de la technologie, Montréal, pp 130

  • Li T, Ducruc JP (1999) Les provinces naturelles. Niveau I du cadre écologique de référence du Québec. Ministère de l’Environnement, p 90. Available online: http://www.mddefp.gouv.qc.ca/biodiversite/aires_protegees/provinces/index.htm

  • Maltby E, Acreman MC (2011) Ecosystem services of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrol Sci J J Des Sci Hydrol 56:1341–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann R, Goldman-Carter J (2008) Avoidance: still the best solution to the compensatory mitigation challenge. Natl Wetl Newsl 30:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JW, Endress AG (2008) Performance critetria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environ Manag 41:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meli P, Rey Benayas JM, Balvanera P, Ramos MM (2014) Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context dependant: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9:e93507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune (MRNF) (2000) Base de données topographiques du Québec, 1:20 000, version 1.0. Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Québec, QC

  • Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune (MRNF) (2010) Système d’information écoforestière. Direction des inventaires forestiers, Ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs, Québec, QC

  • Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environement, de la Faune et des Parcs (MDDEFP) (2013) Le lac Saint-Pierre: un joyau à restaurer. Gouvernement du Québec. ISBN : 978-2-550-69237-9

  • Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environement, de la Faune et des Parcs (2012a) Les milieux humides et l’autorisation environnementale, Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, Direction des politiques de l’eau et Pôle d’expertise hydrique et naturel, p 41 + annexes

  • Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environement, de la Faune et des Parcs (2012b) Portrait de la qualité des eaux de surface au Québec 1999–2008, Québec, Direction du suivi de l’état de l’environnement. ISBN 978-2-550-63649-6 (PDF), p 97

  • Minns CK, Moore JE (2003) Assessment of net change of productive capacity of fish habitats: the role of uncertainty and complexity in decision making. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000a) The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ 35:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000b) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Van Teeffelen AJA, Ben-Haim Y, Ferrier S (2009) How much compensation is enough? A framework for incorporating uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restor Ecol 17:470–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10:e1001247

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Goldman-Carter J, Sibbing J (2009a) Avoidance avoided. Natl Wetl Newsl 31:14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Goldman-Carter J, Sibbing J (2009b) New mitigation rule promises more of the same: why the new Corps and EPA mitigation rule will fail to protect our aquatic resources adequately. Stetson Law Rev 38:311–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray NJ, Clemens RS, Phinn SR, Possingham HP, Fuller RA (2014) Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea. Front Ecol Environ 12:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2001) Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act, Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses, Washington, DC, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Waterscience and Technology Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Nations Research Council, National Academy Press, p 305 et annexes

  • New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, and Environment and Local Government (2001) New Brunswick wetlands conservation policy. Fredericton, NB

  • Pellerin S, Poulin M (2013) Analyse de la situation des milieux humides au Québec et recommandations à des fins de conservation et de gestion durable. Centre de la Science de la Biodiversité du Québec. p 104 + annexes. Available online: http://www.mddelcc.gouv.qc.ca/eau/rives/milieuxhumides.htm

  • Quigley JT, Harper DJ (2006a) Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: a field audit of habitat compensation projects. Environ Manag 37:336–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley JT, Harper DJ (2006b) Effectiveness of fish habitat compensation in Canada in achieving no net loss. Environ Manag 37:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey Benayas JM, Newton AC, Díaz A, Bullock JM (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 13:220–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb JT (2002) Assessing wetland compensatory mitigation sites to aid in establishing mitigation ratios. Wetlands 22:435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubec CDA, Hanson AR (2009) Wetland mitigation and compensation: Canadian experience. Wetl Ecol Manag 17:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl JB, Salzman J (2006) The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. Natl Wetl Newsl 28:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudol MF, Ambrose RF (2002) The US clear Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA. Environ Manag 30:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2011) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Brink, P, Russi D, Farmer A, Badura T, Coates D, Förster J, Kumar R, Davidson N (2013) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlands. Executive summary. Available online: http://img.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TEEB_WaterWetlands_ExecSum_2013.pdf. Consulted 26 May 2016

  • Tiner RW (2005) Assessing cumulative loss of wetland functions in the Nanticoke River watershed using enhanced National Wetlands Inventory data. Wetlands 25:405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischew SA, Baasch A, Conrad MK, Kirmer A (2010) Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: results and demands for control procedures. Restor Ecol 18:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RE, Redmond AM, Zedler JB (2001) Count it by acre or function—mitigation adds up to net loss of wetlands. Natl Wetl Newsl 23:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (UNWWAP) (2003) Water for people, water for life. Available online: http://webworld.unesco.org/water/wwap/facts_figures/protecting_ecosystems.shtml

  • Yu Z, Loisel J, Brosseau DP, Beilman DW, Hunt SJ (2010) Global peatland dynamics since the last glacial maximum. Geophys Res Lett 37:L13402. doi:10.1029/2010GL043584

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:39–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our major project partners for their financial and technical support: Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques du Québec (Grant Number 04104-GQ10165), the Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant Number RGPIN-2014-05663 to MP and RGPIN-2014-05367 to SP) and the Quebec Center for Biodiversity Science. We wish to thank K. Grislis for the stylistic revision of this manuscript, J. Brisson, S. DeBlois and C. Lavoie for their input and useful comments at every stages of the project as well as two anonymous reviewers which made helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monique Poulin.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The project was funded by the Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques du Québec (Grant Number 04104-GQ10165) and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (discovery Grant Number RGPIN-2014-05663 to MP and RGPIN-2014-05367 to SP).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poulin, M., Pellerin, S., Cimon-Morin, J. et al. Inefficacy of wetland legislation for conserving Quebec wetlands as revealed by mapping of recent disturbances. Wetlands Ecol Manage 24, 651–665 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9494-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9494-y

Keywords

  • Compensation
  • Conservation
  • Mitigation
  • No net loss
  • Restoration
  • Wetland policy
  • Wetland creation