Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forecasting sites of future coastal marsh loss using topographical relationships and logistic regression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The last two assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predict that rates of sea level rise will begin to accelerate by c. 2030–2040 CE. Considering that many marsh systems are already under threat from existing sea level trends, a dramatic upswing in rate only a few decades away poses critical questions about what the future may hold for these marshes (and those yet to manifest sea level impacts) requires coast-wide assessments. Extrapolations of detailed historical trends traditionally have provided the least equivocal way of providing such information, but the necessary data required for this approach are often lacking. In this paper, we describe how logistic regression analysis applied to spatial data on marsh loss and degradation—in this case derived from a validated Landsat-based marsh condition model—and its relation to such readily determined parameters as distance from shorelines or tidal creeks can be used to predict where future marsh losses may occur, even in those systems not presently affected. As such, it affords more targeted information for planning than can be had from general submergence versus accretion/elevation change models (e.g., SLAMM) that are limited by the paucity of vertical accretion data. The results also reinforce the concept that marsh adjustment to sea level rise can be broadly deduced at the landscape level, which in some respects is independent of marsh type and is responsive to tidal frame and coastal profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alber EM, Swenson S, Adamowicz C, Mendelssohn IA (2008) Salt marsh dieback: an overview of recent events in the US. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 80:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley RC, Boicourt WC (1981) On estuarine and continental shelf circulation in the Middle Atlantic Bight. In: Warren BA, Wunsch C (eds) Evolution of physical oceanography. MIT, Cambridge, pp 198–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindoff NL, Willebrand J, Artale V, Cazenave A, Gregory J, Gulev S, Hanawa K, Le Quéré C, Levitus S, Nojiri Y, Shum CK, Talley LD, Unnikrishnan, A (2007) In: Solomon, S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt, KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Observations: oceanic climate change and sea level climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Cahoon DR, Reed DJ (1995) Relationships among marsh surface topography, hydroperiod, and soil accretion in a deteriorating Louisiana marsh. J Coast Res 11:357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr, Buresh RJ (1978) Sedimentation rates determined by 137Cs dating in a rapidly accreting salt marsh. Nature 275:532–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delaune RD, Baumann RH, Gosselink RG (1983) Relationships among vertical accretion, coastal submergence, and erosion in a Louisiana gulf coast marsh. J Sediment Petrol 53:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas BC (2001) An introduction to sea level. In: Douglas BC, Kearney MS, Leatherman SP (eds) Sea level rise: history and consequences. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah-Adl H, JáJá J, Liang S, Townshend JRG, Kaufman YJ (1996) Fast algorithms for removing atmospheric effects from satellite images. IEEE Trans Comput Sci Eng 3:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell RP, Patrick WH (1978) Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. In: Hook DD, Crawford RM (eds) Plant life in anaerobic environments. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, pp 375–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney MS, Riter JC (in review) Inter-annual variability in Delaware Bay brackish marsh vegetation. Estuar Coast

  • Kearney MS, Grace RE, Stevenson JC (1988) Marsh loss in the Nanticoke Estuary, Chesapeake Bay. Geogr Rev 78:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney MS, Rogers AS, Townshend JRG, Stevenson JC, Stevens J, Rizzo E, Sundberg K (2002) Landsat imagery shows decline of coastal marshes in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 83(16):173, 177–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney MS, Stutzer DS, Turpie K, Stevenson JC (2009) Spectral properties of marsh vegetation under inundation. J Coast Res 25:1177–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Murray AB (2007) An integrated biologic and physical model of tidal marsh evolution. Proc Nat Acad Proc 104:6118–6122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch MS, Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL (1990) Mechanism for the hydrogen sulfide-induced growth limitation in wetland macrophytes. Limnol Oceanogr 35:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard LA, Luther ME (1995) Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopies. Limnol Oceanogr 40:1474–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Fallah-Adl H, Kalluri S, JáJá J, Kaufman Y, Townshend JRG (1997) An operational atmospheric correction algorithm for Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery over the land. J Geophys Res 102:17173–17186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marani M, Belluco E, D’Alpaos A, Defina A, Lanzoni S, Rinaldo A (2003) On the drainage density of tidal creek networks. Water Resour Res 39:1040. doi:10.1029/2001WR001051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, RA, Teshin MS, Mausel PW, Howe RC (1989) The effects of sea level rise on US coastal wetlands. In: Smith JB, Terpak DA (eds) The potential effects of global climate change on the United States. US Environmental Protection Agency 230-05-89-052, Washington DC, pp 1-1–1-55

  • Reed DJ, Bishara DA, Cahoon DR, Donnelly J, Kearney MS, Kolker AS, Leonard LL, Orson RA, Stevenson JC (2008) Site-specific scenarios for wetlands accretion as sea level rises in the Mid-Atlantic region. Section 2.1 In: Titus JG, Strange EM (eds) Background documents supporting Climate Change Science Program synthesis and assessment product 4.1, EPA 430R07004. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, pp 133–174

  • Rogers AS (2004) The influence of landscape position on marsh loss. Dissertation, University of Maryland. (http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/handle/1903/1409)

  • Rogers AS, Kearney MS (2004) Reducing signature variability in unmixing coastal marsh TM scenes using spectral indices. Int J Remote Sens 12:2317–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson JC, Kearney MS, Pendleton EC (1985) Sedimentation and erosion in a Chesapeake Bay brackish marsh system. Mar Geol 67:213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson JC, Ward LG, Kearney MS (1986) Vertical accretion rates in marshes with varying rates of sea-level rise. In: Wolfe DA (ed) Estuarine variability. Academic Press, New York, pp 241–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson JC, Ward LG, Kearney MS (1988) Sediment transport and trapping in marsh systems: implications of tidal flux studies. Mar Geol 80:37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf RP (1983) The process of sedimentation on the surface of a salt marsh. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 17:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward LG, Kearney MS, Stevenson JC (1998) Variations in sedimentary environments and accretionary processes in estuarine marshes undergoing rapid submergence, Chesapeake Bay. Mar Geol 151:111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is based on doctoral research by A. S. Rogers. The work was supported by grants from the National Aeronautic and Space Administration. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory provided equipment and resources. Applied Ordnance Technology, Inc. provided funding to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Kearney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearney, M.S., Rogers, A.S. Forecasting sites of future coastal marsh loss using topographical relationships and logistic regression. Wetlands Ecol Manage 18, 449–461 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-010-9178-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-010-9178-y

Keywords

Navigation