Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of geomorphology in evaluating remediation options for floodplain wetlands: the case of Ramsar-listed Seekoeivlei, eastern South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The range of benefits bestowed by wetlands is today increasingly recognized, and remediation of degraded wetlands is being carried out around the world. Many degraded wetlands are associated with river floodplains, and an essential requirement for their remediation planning is a comprehensive knowledge of the geomorphological functioning of the river channel and floodplain. Here, we review previous geomorphological investigations of the Ramsar-listed Seekoeivlei floodplain wetlands, Free State Province, South Africa, and demonstrate how the knowledge gained is playing a key role in evaluating remediation options that are needed following more than a century of direct and indirect human impacts. Faunal and floral changes, coupled with channel modifications, have altered the flow and sediment regime and initiated major changes to erosional and depositional patterns, including promoting rapid headward growth of a new channel and abandonment of a former channel. These changes have led to further management interventions, including installation of weirs and erosion control structures. In an ideal world, remediation would strive to return a wetland to its natural, pre-impact state but, in reality, other management goals have to be taken into consideration. In the case of Seekoeivlei, these include maintaining current habitat and biodiversity (this has the added advantage of promoting local tourism, especially bird watching), and using the wetlands for water quality enhancement. Attempts to return the wetlands to their pre-impact state (e.g. by removing exotic trees and erosion control structures) would in fact further reduce habitat and biodiversity, permanently in the case of some avian species, and for centuries in the case of some aquatic species, because of the very slow natural rates of channel and floodplain change. Alternative options will all require ongoing intervention, albeit of variable intensity, but in effect will mean that the wetland will never return to its pre-impact state. Remediation will thus create an essentially ‘artificial’ wetland complex that restores some of the ecological and hydrological functions but that is likely to remain very far from its natural geomorphic condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1998) A success story: Rand water and Free State Nature Conservation rehabilitate Seekoeivlei. African Wildlife 52:42

  • Begg G (1986) The wetlands of Natal (Part 1): an overview of their extent, role and present status. Natal Town and Regional Planning Report No. 68. The Natal Town and Regional Planning Commission, Pietermaritzburg

  • Dugan PJ (ed) (1993) Wetlands in danger. Mitchell Beazley and IUCN—World Conservation Union, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellery WN, McCarthy TS (1994) Principles for the sustainable utilization of the Okavango Delta ecosystem, Botswana. Biol Conserv 70:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezcurra E (ed) (2006) Global deserts outlook. United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations, Nairobi

  • Free State Department of Tourism, Environmental and Economic Affairs (2005) Integrated management plan 2006–2011: Seekoeivlei Nature Reserve. Free State Department of Tourism, Environmental and Economic Affairs, Bloemfontein

  • Grenfell MC, Ellery WN, Garden SE, Dini J, van der Valk AG (2007) The language of intervention: a review of concepts and terminology in wetland ecosystem repair. Water SA 33:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan WR III, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (1987) Restoration ecology: ecological restoration as a technique for basic research. In: Jordan WR III, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford R (ed) (2006) Ecology of desert rivers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW, Crimaldi JP (2007) A delicate balance: ecohydrological feedbacks governing landscape morphology in a lotic peatland. Ecol Monogr 77:591–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E (1986) Waterlogged wealth: why waste the world’s wet places?. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marren PM, McCarthy TS, Tooth S, Brandt D, Stacey GG, Leong A, Spottiswoode B (2006) A comparison of mud- and sand-dominated meanders in a downstream coarsening reach of the mixed bedrock-alluvial Klip River, eastern Free State, South Africa. Sed Geol 190:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy TS, Venter J, Arnold V, Ellery WN (2007) The collapse of Johannesburg’s Klip River wetland. S Afr J Sci 103:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley DC, Pitman WV, Middleton BJ (1994) Surface water resources of South Africa 1990, vol 2. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water. Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodnight H, Duller GAT, Tooth S, Wintle AG (2005) Optical dating of a scroll-bar sequence on the Klip River, South Africa, to derive the lateral migration rate of a meander bend. Holocene 15:802–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodnight H, Duller GAT, Wintle AG, Tooth S (2006) Assessing the reproducibility and accuracy of optical dating of fluvial deposits. Quat Geochronol 1:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan JS, Duck RW, Werritty A (eds) (2006) Sediment dynamics and the hydromorphology of fluvial systems. IAHS Publication No. 306. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Press, Wallingford

  • Schulze RE (1997) South African atlas of agrohydrology and -climatology. Report No. TT82/96. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

  • Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, McCarthy TS (2007) Wetlands in drylands: key geomorphological and sedimentological characteristics, with emphasis on examples from southern Africa. Prog Phys Geogr 31:3–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, McCarthy TS, Brandt D, Hancox PJ, Morris R (2002) Geological controls on the formation of alluvial meanders and floodplain wetlands: the example of the Klip River, eastern Free State, South Africa. Earth Surf Proc Land 27:797–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, Brandt D, Hancox PJ, McCarthy TS (2004) Geological controls on alluvial river behaviour: a comparative study of three rivers on the South African Highveld. J Afr Earth Sc 38:79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, Rodnight H, Duller GAT, McCarthy TS, Marren PM, Brandt D (2007) Chronology and controls of avulsion along a mixed bedrock-alluvial river. Geol Soc Am Bull 119:452–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, Rodnight H, McCarthy TS, Duller GAT, Grundling AT (2009) Late Quaternary dynamics of a South African floodplain wetland and the implications for assessing recent human impacts. Geomorphology 106:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzolova GV (1995) An experiment in greenway analysis and assessment: the Danube River. Landsc Urban Plan 33:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV (1998) Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes and aquatic conservation. Biol Conserv 83:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WD (1999) Conservation of wetlands in drylands: a key global issue. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 9:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by Aberystwyth University (formerly the University of Wales, Aberystwyth) and the University of the Witwatersrand. Ian Gulley and Anthony Smith (Aberystwyth University) provided valuable assistance with the preparation of figures. We thank Eric Wolanski (journal editor) and the two anonymous reviewers for their positive comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Tooth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, T.S., Tooth, S., Kotze, D.C. et al. The role of geomorphology in evaluating remediation options for floodplain wetlands: the case of Ramsar-listed Seekoeivlei, eastern South Africa. Wetlands Ecol Manage 18, 119–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9153-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9153-7

Keywords

Navigation