Skip to main content
Log in

‘Mitigation banks’ for wetland conservation: a major success or an unmitigated disaster?

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First developed in the USA in the early 1970s, ‘wetland mitigation banks’ provide a framework for conservation activities that are designed to offset residual, unavoidable damage to the natural environment caused by development activities. The concept is now a worldwide phenomenon. In this paper I consider the level of success of wetland mitigation banks in the USA for biodiversity conservation with a view to informing ‘best practice’ in Australia. I conclude that although the concept has merit, even in the USA where the processes have been evolving for over 30 years, the outcomes frequently fall short of the target of a ‘like for like’ swap of habitat. While the outcome for wetland mitigation may not be an ‘unmitigated disaster’ it is, at best, apparently only modestly successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose RF, Lee SF (2004) An evaluation of compensatory mitigation projects permitted under Clean Water Act Sect. 401 by the Los Angeles Regional Quality Control Board, 1991–2002. California State Water Resources Control Board, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose RF, Callaway JC, Lee SF (2006) An evaluation of compensatory mitigation projects permitted under Clean Water Act Sect. 401 by the Los Angeles Regional Quality Control Board, 1991–2002. California State Water Resources Control Board, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker B (1999) Washington Watch: government regulation of wetlands is under siege from all sides. Bioscience 49:869

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessdamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953. doi:10.1126/science.1073947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balzano S, Ertman A, Brancheau L, Smejkal W, Greene AS, Kaplan M, Fanz D (2002) Creating indicators of wetland status (quantity and quality): freshwater wetland mitigation in New Jersey. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science, Research and Technology, Trenton

    Google Scholar 

  • Banana A (2005) Managing Uganda’s forest in the face of uncertainty and competing demands: what is the precautionary approach? In: Dickson B, Cooney R (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle: risk and uncertainty. Earthscan, London, pp 225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkmann J, Windhorst W (2000) Hedging our bets: they utility of ecological integrity. In: Jørgensen SE, Müller F (eds) Handbook of ecosystem theories and management. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 497–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayon R (2002) Making money in environmental derivatives. The Milken Institute Review. http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2002/making_money_in_environmental_derivatives. Accessed 8 Nov 2008

  • Brown SC, Veneman PLM (2001) Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21:508–518. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0508:EOCWMI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2002) Tragic consequences for conservation of mis-defining the term ‘community’. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) A clash of paradigms: community and research-based conservation. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2006) Confirmation of an established population of exotic turtles in urban Sydney. Aust Zool 33:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2007) Status report on Trachemys scripta elegans: pet terrapin or Australia’s pest turtles? In: Lunney D, Hutchings P, Burgin S (eds) Pest or guest: the zoology of overabundance. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2008) An environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity baning offsets in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 17:807–816. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9319-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S, Wotherspoon D (2009) The potential of golf courses for one type of BioBanking offset: a case study in biodiversity restoration. Urban Wetl 12:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers S, Paton DCP (2005) The conservation value of paddock trees. A review prepared for Land and Water Australia and the South Australian Native Vegetation Council. Native Vegetation R & D program, Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalem AAGR (1998) Demography and movement patterns of a population of eastern snake-necked turtles, Chelodina longicollis (Shaw 1974). MSc(Hons) Thesis, University of Western Sydney, South Penrith

  • DEC (2006) BioBanking: an investigation of market-based instruments to secure long-term instruments to secure long-term biodiversity objectives. Background Paper. Department of Environment and Conservation New South Wales, Sydney

  • DNR (1999) Water access and trade: farm dams. Department of Natural Resources. http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/dams.shtml. Accessed 14 Nov 2008

  • DPI (2007) Endangered ecological communities in NSW: Lowland Darling River aquatic ecological community. Primefact 173, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens

  • Ellison K, Daily GC (2003) Making conservation profitable. Conserv Mag 4(2):12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1995) Federal guidance for the establishment, use and operation of mitigation banks. Fed Regist 28:58605–58614

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Offsets for land clearing: no net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecol Manage Restor 8:26–31. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00328.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper DJ, Quigley JT (2005) No net loss of fish habitat: a review and analysis of habitat compensation in Canada. Environ Manag (N Y) 36:343–355. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0114-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10-9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art19/. Assessed 7 Nov 2008

  • ICMM (2005) Biodiversity offsets: a briefing paper for the mining industry. International Council on Mining and Metals, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2006) 2006 IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature/Species Survival Commission. http://www.iucn.org/themes/sscc/redklist2006. Accessed 7 Nov 2008

  • Johnson P, Mock DL, McMillan A, Driscoll L, Hruby T (2002) Washington state wetland mitigation evaluation study, Phase 2: evaluating success. Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication Number 02-06-009

  • Kaiser J (2001) Wetland restoration: recreated wetlands no match for original. Science 293(5527):25. doi:10.1126/science.293.5527.25a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kentula ME, Sifneos JC, Good JW, Rylko M, Kunz K (1992) Trends and patterns in Sect. 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA. Environ Manag (N Y) 16:109–119. doi:10.1007/BF02393913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihslinger RL (2008) Success of wetland mitigation projects. Nat Wetl News 30(2):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkin P, Ladd R (2003) Success of Corps-required mitigation in New England. US Army Corps of Engineers, New England District, Concord, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • NFA (2004) A taxonomic summary of Australian freshwater fish. Native Fish Australia. http://www.nativefish.asn.au/taxonomy.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2008

  • NRC (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Race MS (1985) Critique of present wetland mitigation policies in the united states based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environ Manag (N Y) 9:71–81. doi:10.1007/BF01871446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl JB, Salzam J (2006) The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. FSU College of Law, Public Law Research. Paper number 197. Revision posted September 3 2006. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id.878331. Accessed 7 Nov 2008

  • Ruhl JB, Salzman J, Goodman I (2008) Implementing the new ecosystem services mandate of the Sect. 404 Compensatory Mitigation Program: a catalyst for advancing science and policy. Stetson Law Review. http://ssrn.com/abstract. Accessed 8 Nov 2008

  • Stokstad E (2008) Environmental regulation: new rule on saving wetlands push the limits of science. Science 320(5873):162–163. doi:10.1126/science.320.5873.162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudol MF, Ambrose RF (2002) The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Oroange County, California, USA. Environ Manag (N Y) 30:727–734. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2787-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Kate K, Bishop J, Bayon R (2004) Biodiversity offsets: views, experience, and the business case. IUCN, Cambridge, and Insight Investment, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott K (2001) New corps regulatory guidance letter. Soc Wetl Sci Bull 18(4):13–14. doi:10.1672/0732-9393(2001)018[0013:NCRGL]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R, Redmond A, Zedler J (2001) Count it by acre or function—mitigation adds up to net loss of wetlands. Nat Wetl News 23(6) Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC

  • Washington Biodiversity Project (2006) Bainbridge island selected for international biodiversity project. http://www.biodiversity.wa.ogv.ourbiodviersity/bainbridge.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2008

  • White AW, Burgin S (2004) Current status and future prospects of reptiles and frogs in Sydney’s urban-impacted bushland reserves. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) Urban wildlife: more than meets the eye. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 109–123

  • Wotherspoon D, Burgin S (2009a) The consultant ecologist’s role in the New South Wales (Australia) approach to biodiversity offsets—‘BioBanking’. Local Environ 14(2):61–72. doi:10.1080/13549830802522533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotherspoon D, Burgin S (2009b) Impact on the natural history due to the intensifying urbanisation of western Sydney: death by a thousand cuts. A natural history of Sydney. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman (in press)

  • WSSD (2002) Sound management, investment in people, environmental stewardship crucial for development: U.S. Secretary of State tells Summit. World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 26 August–4 September 2002. http://www.un.org/events/wssd/. Accessed 6 Nov 2008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Burgin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgin, S. ‘Mitigation banks’ for wetland conservation: a major success or an unmitigated disaster?. Wetlands Ecol Manage 18, 49–55 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9147-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9147-5

Keywords

Navigation