Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Double-observer approach to estimating egg mass abundance of pool-breeding amphibians

  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in seasonally flooded pools, and the status of associated amphibian populations, has initiated programs in the northeastern United States to document and monitor these habitats. Counting egg masses is an effective way to determine the population size of pool-breeding amphibians, such as wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum). However, bias is associated with counts if egg masses are missed. Counts unadjusted for the proportion missed (i.e., without adjustment for detection probability) could lead to false assessments of population trends. We used a dependent double-observer method in 2002–2003 to estimate numbers of wood frog and spotted salamander egg masses at seasonal forest pools in 13 National Wildlife Refuges, 1 National Park, 1 National Seashore, and 1 State Park in the northeastern United States. We calculated detection probabilities for egg masses and examined whether detection probabilities varied by species, observers, pools, and in relation to pool characteristics (pool area, pool maximum depth, within-pool vegetation). For the 2 years, model selection indicated that no consistent set of variables explained the variation in data sets from individual Refuges and Parks. Because our results indicated that egg mass detection probabilities vary spatially and temporally, we conclude that it is essential to use estimation procedures, such as double-observer methods with egg mass surveys, to determine population sizes and trends of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Aastrup A. Mosbech (1993) ArticleTitleTransect width and missed observations in counting musk oxen (Ovibos moschatus) from fixed-wing aircraft Rangifer 13 99–104

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.A. Alford S.J. Richards (1999) ArticleTitleGlobal amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 133–165 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bart J.D. Schoultz (1984) ArticleTitleReliability of singing bird surveys: Changes in observer efficiency with avian density Auk 101 307–318

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.T. Brooks Hayashi M. (2002) ArticleTitleDepth-area-volume and hydroperiod relationships of ephemeral (vernal) forest pools in southern New England Wetlands 22 247–255

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Burne (2001) Massachusetts Aerial Survey of Potential Vernal Pools Natural Heritage and Endangered Species ProgramMassachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife WestboroughMassachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.P. Burnham D.P. Anderson (1998) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach Academic Press New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.J.K. Calhoun M.W. Klemens (2002) Best Development Practices: Conserving Pool-Breeding Amphibians in Residential and Commercial Developments in the Northeastern United States MCA Technical Paper No. 5, Metropolitan Conservation AllianceWildlife Conservation Society Bronx, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.J.K. Calhoun (2003) Maine Citizen’s Guide to Locating and Documenting Vernal Pools Maine Audubon Society FalmouthMaineUSA

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.A. Colburn (1997) Certified: A Citizen’s Step-by-step Guide to Protecting Vernal Pools Massachusetts Audubon Society Lincoln, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.D. Cook J.O. Jacobson (1979) ArticleTitleA design for estimating visibility bias in aerial surveys Biometrics 35 735–742

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.P. Corn L.J. Livo (1989) ArticleTitleLeopard frog and wood frog reproduction in Colorado and Wyoming Northwestern Naturalist 70 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. W.B. Crouch P.W.C. Paton (2000) ArticleTitleUsing egg-mass counts to monitor wood frog populations Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 895–901

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.S. Davis G.W. Folkerts (1986) ArticleTitleLife history of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica LeConte (Amphibia: Ranidae), in Alabama Brimleyana 12 29–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Diehl (1981) Bird populations consist of individuals differing in many respects C.J. Ralph J.M. Scott (Eds) Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds Studies in Avian Biology 6. Allen Press LawrenceKansas, USA 225–229

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.S. Egan (2001) Within-pond and landscape-level factors influencing the breeding effort of Rana sylvaticaAmbystoma maculatum University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode IslandUSA

    Google Scholar 

  16. L.C. Hayek (1994) Research design for quantitative amphibian studies W.R. Heyer M.A. Donnelly R.W. McDiarmid L.C. Hayek M.S. Foster (Eds) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, DC, USA 21–39

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Hels E. Buchwald (2001) ArticleTitleThe effect of road kills on amphibian populations Biol. Conserv. 99 331–340 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00215-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hines J.E. 1996. SURVIV (web version) – Software to compute estimates of survival (or any model parameter) from multi-nomially distributed data. USGS-PWRC, http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/surviv.html.

  19. R.E. Jung G.H. Dayton S.J. Williamson J.R. Sauer S. Droege (2002) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of population index and estimation techniques for tadpoles in desert pools J. Herpetol. 36 465–472

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.P. Kenney (1995) Wicked Big Puddles Vernal Pool Association Reading, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.P. Kenney M.R. Burne (2000) A Field Guide to the Animals of Vernal Pools Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage Endangered Species Program WestboroughMassachusetts, and Vernal Pool Association, Reading, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.A. Lancia J.D. Nichols K.H. Pollock (1994) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations T. Bookhout (Eds) Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats The Wildlife Society BethesdaMarylandUSA 215–253

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.D. Nichols J.E. Hines J.R. Sauer F. Fallon J. Fallon P.J. Heglund (2000) ArticleTitleA double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from avian point counts Auk 117 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.W. Petranka (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.L. Preisser J.Y. Kefer J.D. Lawrence T.W. Clark (2000) ArticleTitleVernal pool conservation in Connecticut: An assessment and recommendations Environ. Manage. 26 503–513 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010108 Occurrence Handle10982728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. C.L. Rowe W.A. Dunson (1995) ArticleTitleImpacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of Central PennsylvaniaUSA Oecologia 102 397–403 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00341351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B.R. Schmidt (2003) ArticleTitleCount datadetection probabilities, and the demography, dynamics, distribution, and decline of amphibians C R Biol. 326 S119–S124 Occurrence Handle14558460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Tappan (Eds) (1997) Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire New Hampshire Fish & Game DepartmentNongame and Endangered Species ProgramConcord New HampshireUSA

    Google Scholar 

  29. G.C. White (1992) PC SURVIV User’s Manual Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University Fort Collins, ColoradoUSA

    Google Scholar 

  30. B.K. Williams J.D. Nichols M.J. Conroy (2002) Analysis and Management of Animal Populations: Modeling, Estimation and Decision Making Academic Press San DiegoCaliforniaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  31. B.S. Windmiller (1996) The Pondthe Forestand the City: Spotted Salamander Ecology and Conservation in a Human-Dominated Landscape Tufts University MedfordMassachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  32. A.H. Wright A.A. Wright (1949) Handbook of Frogs and Toads of the United States and Canada. 3rd edn Comstock Publishing Associates IthacaNew York, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Drive, 20708, Laurel, MD, USA

    Evan H. Campbell Grant, Robin E. Jung, James D. Nichols & James E. Hines

Authors
  1. Evan H. Campbell Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robin E. Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James D. Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James E. Hines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan H. Campbell Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell Grant, E.H., Jung, R.E., Nichols, J.D. et al. Double-observer approach to estimating egg mass abundance of pool-breeding amphibians. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13, 305–320 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-7524-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-7524-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation