Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growth of industry and agriculture, nitrogenous compounds like nitrate and ammonium have contributed significantly to the contamination of groundwater. These pollutants cause intoxication and even may lead to stomach cancer. Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is considered an in situ and low-cost method for groundwater treatment. This research aims to evaluate six different inexpensive reactive substances such as perlite and sand (1:1), cocopeat and sand (1:1), activated carbon, sawdust and sand (1:1), zeolite, and pumice for removing nitrate with an initial concentration of 100 mgL−1 and three reactive materials such as Leca, vermiculite and pumice (1:1), and cocopeat and pumice (1:1) for removing ammonium with two initial concentrations of 20 mgL−1 and 40 mgL−1 utilizing column experiments. Some of these absorbents have been rarely used in PRB to remove nitrogenous compounds. The plexiglass column utilized in column experiments and water flow through the layer in the column is due to the constant head difference. Results showed that all the reactive materials that have been used in removing nitrate had good performance with a minimum removal percentage above 73%. The best performance among these reactive substances belonged to a mixture of perlite and sand (1:1) with a maximum removal efficiency of 100%. The mixture of cocopeat and pumice (1:1) had the best performance among the materials were chosen for the ammonium treatment, with maximum removal percentages of 80% and 70% for initial concentrations of 20 mgL−1 and 40 mgL−1, respectively. Variations in the permeability coefficient of the reactive materials were investigated in this study, as an essential factor in the lifespan of the reactant during the column experiments. Results of constant head permeability tests revealed that a rapid drop was observed in the reactive layer’s permeability coefficient during the period leading up to the maximum removal percentage and then a subsequent minor decline occurred.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Alshameri, A., He, H., Zhu, J., Xi, Y., Zhu, R., Ma, L., & Tao, Q. (2018). Adsorption of ammonium by different natural clay minerals: Characterization, kinetics and adsorption isotherms. Applied Clay Science, 159, 83–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ateia, M., Yoshimura, C., Nasr, M. (2016). In-situ biological water treatment technologies for environmental remediation: A review. J Bioremed Biodeg 7, 2.

  • Bandosz, T. J. (2006). Activated carbon surfaces in environmental remediation. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, A., & Sillanpää, M. (2010). Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment—A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 157, 277–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, A., & Sillanpää, M. (2011). A review of emerging adsorbents for nitrate removal from water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, 493–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buyanjargal, A., Kang, J., Sleep, B. E., & Jeen, S.-W. (2021). Sequential treatment of nitrate and phosphate in groundwater using a permeable reactive barrier system. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Wang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., & Liu, F. (2022). Eight-year performance evaluation of a field-scale zeolite permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of ammonium-contaminated groundwater. Applied Geochemistry, 143, 105372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Pourcq, K., Ayora, C., García-Gutiérrez, M., Missana, T., & Carrera, J. (2015). A clay permeable reactive barrier to remove Cs-137 from groundwater: Column experiments. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 149, 36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erto, A., Bortone, I., Di Nardo, A., Di Natale, M., & Musmarra, D. (2014). Permeable adsorptive barrier (PAB) for the remediation of groundwater simultaneously contaminated by some chlorinated organic compounds. Journal of Environmental Management, 140, 111–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, A., Sulaymon, A., & Khaliefa, Q. (2018). A review of permeable reactive barrier as passive sustainable technology for groundwater remediation. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15, 1123–1138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fewtrell, L. (2004). Drinking-water nitrate, methemoglobinemia, and global burden of disease: A discussion. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112, 1371–1374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, O., Assal, A., Devlin, H., Elliot, T., & Kalin, R. M. (2019). Performance of a field-scale biological permeable reactive barrier for in-situ remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 211–220.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Q., Li, F., Chen, X., Tian, C., Liu, C., & Liu, D. (2019). Assessment of the use of a zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier for nitrate removal from groundwater in the alluvial plain of the Dagu River, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, M. A., Mukhopadhyay, S., Sahu, J. N., & Sengupta, B. (2011). Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2355–2388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller-Bittrolff, K., Foreman, K., Bulseco-McKim, A. N., Benoit, J., & Bowen, J. L. (2018). Effects of mercury addition on microbial community composition and nitrate removal inside permeable reactive barriers. Environmental Pollution, 242, 797–806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, G., Liu, F., Liu, M., Kong, X., Li, S., Chen, L., Colberg, P. J., Jin, S., & Chen, H. (2014). Performance of a permeable reactive barrier for in situ removal of ammonium in groundwater. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 14, 585–592.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G., Liu, F., Yang, Y., Deng, W., Li, S., Huang, Y., & Kong, X. (2015). Removal of ammonium-nitrogen from groundwater using a fully passive permeable reactive barrier with oxygen-releasing compound and clinoptilolite. Journal of Environmental Management, 154, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue-Choi, M., Sinha, R., Gierach, G. L., & Ward, M. H. (2015). Dietary nitrate and nitrite, micronutrients, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer Research, 75, 1883–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. J., Howarth, A. J., Moghadam, P. Z., DeCoste, J. B., Snurr, R. Q., Hupp, J. T., & Farha, O. K. (2016). High volumetric uptake of ammonia using Cu-MOF-74/Cu-CPO-27. Dalton Transactions, 45, 4150–4153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, L. (2013). A study of nitrate contamination in ground water of Delhi, India. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 10, 91–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, M. M., Marchant, H. K., & Kartal, B. (2018). The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16, 263–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, L., Gong, Y., & Qian, J. (2020). Corncob PRB for on-site nitrate removal in groundwater. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 1–11.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, F., Yeyao, W., & Bai, L. (2015). Remediation of nitrate and chromium contaminated groundwater by zero-valent iron PRB. Frontier of Environmental Science, 4, 39–45.

  • Mittal, A., Singh, R., Chakma, S., & Goel, G. (2020). Permeable reactive barrier technology for the remediation of groundwater contaminated with nitrate and phosphate resulted from pit-toilet leachate. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-B., Lee, S.-H., Lee, J.-W., & Lee, C.-Y. (2002). Lab scale experiments for permeable reactive barriers against contaminated groundwater with ammonium and heavy metals using clinoptilolite (01-29B). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 95, 65–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S., Fowler, G., Sollars, C., & Perry, R. (1992). Low-cost adsorbents for waste and wastewater treatment: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 116, 31–52.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radu, G., & Racoviteanu, G. (2021). Removing ammonium from water intended for human consumption. A review of existing technologies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 664, 012029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar, E., Ghiassi, R., & Akbary, Z. (2017). Lead removal from groundwater by granular mixtures of pumice, perlite and lime using permeable reactive barriers. Water and Environment Journal, 31, 39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivett, M. O., Buss, S. R., Morgan, P., Smith, J. W., & Bemment, C. D. (2008). Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: A review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Research, 42, 4215–4232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Y., Murayama, K., Nakai, T., & Takahashi, N. (1995). Nitric acid adsorption by a phosphonic acid ester type adsorbent. Water Research, 29, 1267–1271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L. A., & Vojvodić-Vuković, M. (2000). Nitrate removal from groundwater and denitrification rates in a porous treatment wall amended with sawdust. Ecological Engineering, 14, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statham, T. M., Stark, S. C., Snape, I., Stevens, G. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2016). A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) media sequence for the remediation of heavy metal and hydrocarbon contaminated water: A field assessment at Casey Station, Antarctica. Chemosphere, 147, 368–375.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suhogusoff, A. V., Hirata, R., Aravena, R., Robertson, W. D., Ferrari, L. C. K., Stimson, J., & Blowes, D. W. (2019). Dynamics of nitrate degradation along an alternative latrine improved by a sawdust permeable reactive barrier (PRB) installed in an irregular settlement in the municipality of São Paulo (Brazil). Ecological Engineering, 138, 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vikrant, K., Kumar, V., Kim, K.-H., & Kukkar, D. (2017). Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): Potential and challenges for capture and abatement of ammonia. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 5, 22877–22896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Peng, Y. (2010). Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 11–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. H., DeKok, T. M., Levallois, P., Brender, J., Gulis, G., Nolan, B. T., & VanDerslice, J. (2005). Workgroup report: Drinking-water nitrate and health—Recent findings and research needs. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 1607–1614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y.-X., Chen, J.-K., Zhao, L., You, Y.-Q., Chen, Z.-J., Cao, J.-N., Liu, F., Zhang, S., Zhan, L.-T., & Chen, Y.-M. (2023). A kinetic-based zeolite PRB design method for remediating groundwater polluted by high NH4+ MSW leachate considering spatio-temporal concentration evolutions. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 29, 103020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, D., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Li, X., Chen, Z., Huang, J., Li, X., Flores, G., & Kamon, M. (2014). Column test-based optimization of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technique for remediating groundwater contaminated by landfill leachates. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 168, 1–16.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water and Environmental Measurement and Monitoring Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Sohrab Amani, Zahra Akbari, Reza Ghiassi, Saeed Ehsani & Milad Rezaeishirazi

Authors
  1. Sohrab Amani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahra Akbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Ghiassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeed Ehsani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Milad Rezaeishirazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ghiassi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amani, S., Akbari, Z., Ghiassi, R. et al. Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments. Water Air Soil Pollut 235, 136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-06936-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-06936-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation