Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Low- and Medium-Pressure UV Lamps for Photo-degradation of RDX Wastewater

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) is a highly toxic heterocyclic nitramine compound which enters the environment during manufacturing, disposal, or military training activities. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment methods, including direct photolysis, photo-peroxidation, and the photo-Fenton oxidation, using low- and medium-pressure UV lamps for the degradation of RDX wastewater. Rate of degradation and mineralization of RDX, COD reduction, and nitrate content were compared for all these processes. In terms of RDX degradation, the study found that direct photolysis with 125-W medium-pressure UV lamp resulted in 71% removal rate. In contrast, the low-pressure UV lamp of 16 W intensity only showed removal rate of 35%. When comparing the UV/H2O2 process to direct photolysis, it was found that the degradation rate of RDX increased for both low- and medium-pressure systems. Among the different advanced oxidation processes evaluated, the photo-Fenton oxidation process resulted in the highest degradation of RDX compared to direct photolysis and photo-peroxidation processes. Specifically, the addition of 10 mL of Fenton’s reagent at a ratio of 1:3 (H2O2:Fe2+) resulted in 98% and 57% removal of RDX within 60 min of irradiation time for the medium-pressure and low-pressure UV lamps, respectively. The highest levels of mineralization for RDX in terms of COD and nitrate removal, amounting to 90% and 42%, respectively were obtained using photo-Fenton oxidation in 60 min of treatment time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data can be available on request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support and encouragement provided by Director Centre for Fire Explosive and Environment Safety (CFEES), DRDO, India, is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Pallvi Bhanot and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pallvi Bhanot.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhanot, P., Celin, S.M., Sharma, P. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Low- and Medium-Pressure UV Lamps for Photo-degradation of RDX Wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 234, 587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06602-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06602-3

Keywords

Navigation