Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overview of Emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport and Impact of Local Weather on Related Pollutant Concentrations

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used AEDT 2.d to estimate the pollutant emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport (YUL) for 2015 while quantifying the impact of the airport’s taxi time and atmospheric conditions on aircraft emissions. Using the more airport-specific parameters available and ICAO standard values otherwise, the yearly emissions of NOx, HC, CO, PM10, SOx, and CO2 at YUL were, respectively, 7.64 102, 1.18 102, 1.33 103, 1.35 101, 6.77 101, and 2.31 105 tonnes/year. The results show that reducing aircraft taxi time by 31 % reduced aircraft emissions by 6 % (NOx) and 27 % (CO). Atmospheric conditions impact aircraft emissions of NOx, CO and HC with a seasonal effect. Summer conditions reduced NOx emissions by 5 % and increased CO emissions by 2 %, while winter conditions reduced HC and CO emissions by approximately 15 % and increased NOx emissions by 1 %. To further investigate the impact of atmospheric conditions, dispersion calculations of NOx and CO emissions were carried out using identical air-traffic and weather data from the warmest and coldest weeks in 2015. The results demonstrate that pollutant concentrations were higher during the winter and that pollutants were also dispersed further during the winter than the summer according to the dominant wind direction. A 1-h NOx and CO concentrations greater than 10 μg/m3 were found up to 24 km and 30 km, respectively, away during the winter compared to 14 km and 20 km during the summer. Yet, local air quality standards were satisfied as pollutant concentrations found outside the airport enclosure were below those standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aéroports de Montréal. (2016). 2015 Annual Report.

  • Aéroports de Montréal. (2018). Statistiques. Retrieved February 05, 2019, from Aéroports de Montréal: https://www.admtl.com/sites/default/files/2018/ADM_Statsdet_2018_FR.pdf

  • Ahearn, M., Boeker, E., Gorshkov, S., Hansen, A., Hwang, S., Koopmann, J., . . . Noel, G. (2017). Aviation Environmental Design Tool ( AEDT ) Technical Manual Version 2d. U.S. Department of Transportation.

  • Anderson, B. E., Chen, G., & Blake, D. R. (2006). Hydrocarbon emissions from a modern commercial airliner. Atmospheric Environment, 40(19), 3601–3612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belda, M., Holtanová, E., Halenka, T., & Kalvová, J. (2014). Climate classification revisited: From Köppen to Trewartha. Climate Research, 59, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazowski, W. S., Walsh, D. E., & Mach, K. D. (1973). Prediction of aircraft gas turbine NOx emissions dependence on engine operating parameters and ambient conditions. AIAA/SAE 9th Propulsion Conference. Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Carr, E., Lee, M., Marin, K., Holder, C., Hoyer, M., Pedde, M., et al. (2011). Development and evaluation of an air quality modeling approach to assess near-field impacts of lead emissions from piston-engine aircraft operating on leaded aviation gasoline. Atmospheric Environment, 45(32), 5795–5804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • City of Montreal. (2019). Suivi de la qualité de l'air - Réseau de surveillance de la qualité de l'air. Retrieved from http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/portal/page?_pageid=7237,74495616&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL

  • Dubois, D., & Paynter, G. C. (2006). “ Fuel Flow Method2 ” for Estimating Aircraft Emissions. Sae Technical Paper Series.

  • El Hadik, A. A. (1990). The impact of atmospheric conditions on gas turbine performance. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 112, 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2906210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment and Climate Change Canada. Personal communication (2018). 2015 monthly emissions estimates for Montreal’s Trudeau Airport. Internal communication.

  • Environment and Climate Change Canada. Unpublished results (2014). AGEM User Manual. Internal report.

  • Eurocontrol Experimental Centre. (2004). User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA), Revision 3.6. EEC Note No. 10/04 Project ACE-C-E2.

  • European Civil Aviation Conference. (2005). Report on Standard Method of Computing Noise Contours around Civil Airports. Doc 29 (3rd Edition).

  • European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2019). ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank. Retrieved 04 2020, from EASA: https://www.easa.europa.eu/domains/environment/icao-aircraft-engine-emissions-databank

  • Federal Aviation Administration. (2016). Airport Categories. Retrieved 10 27, 2017, from https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_allcargo_stats/categories/

  • Fleuti, M. (2014). Aircraft Ground Handling Emissions at Zurich Airport Methodology and Emission Factors Zurich Airport. Zürich Airport. Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG).

  • Fleuti, E., & Hofmann, P. (2005). Aircraft APU emissions at Zurich airport. Unique (Flughafen Zürich AG).

  • Fleuti, E., & Maraini, S. (2012). Air Quality Assessment Sensitivities. Flughafen Zürich AG.

  • Government of Canada. (2019). Historical Climate Data. Retrieved from https://climat.meteo.gc.ca/index_e.html

  • Government of Quebec. (2019). Environment Quality Act - chapter Q-2, r. 38 - Regulation respecting the quality of the atmosphere. Québec.

  • Heywood, J. B., & Mikus, T. (1973). Parameters controlling nitric oxide emissions from gas turbine combustors. AGARD Conference Proceedings No.125 "Atmospheric pollution by aircraft engines". London.

  • International Air Transport Association. (2017). Press Release n°55 : 2036 Forecast Reveals Air Passengers Will Nearly Double to 7.8 Billion. Retrieved from IATA: https://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pages/2017-10-24-01.aspx

  • International Air Transport Association. (2020). 20 Year Passenger Forecast. Retrieved 02 22, 2021, from https://www.iata.org/en/publications/store/20-year-passenger-forecast/

  • International Civil Aviation Organization. (1993). Manual of the ICAO Standard Atmosphere extended to 80 kilometers (262 500 feet). Doc 7488/3.

  • International Civil Aviation Organization. (2011). Airport air quality manual First Edition. Montreal.

  • International Civil Aviation Organization. (2013). ICAO environmental report 2013: Destination Green-Aviation and climate change. Montreal: ICAO Environmental Branch.

  • Kauffman, C. W. (1980). Effect of Ambient Conditions on the Emissions From a Gas Turbine Combustor. NASA Contractor Report 3355, NASA.

  • Kinsey, J. S., Timko, M. T., Herndon, S. C., Wood, E. C., Yu, Z., Miake-Lye, R. C., et al. (2012). Determination of the emissions from an aircraft auxiliary power unit (APU) during the Alternative Aviation Fuel Experiment (AAFEX). Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 62(4), 420–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. S. (2009). Aviation and global climate in the 21st century. Atmospheric Environment, 43(2009), 35203537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipfert, F. W. (1972). Correlation of gas turbine emissions data. Proceedings of the ASME 1972 International Gas Turbine and Fluids Engineering Conference and Products Show. San Francisco, Californie, USA.

  • Marzeski, J. W., & Blazowski, W. S. (1976). Ambient temperature and pressure corrections for aircraft gas turbine idle pollutant emissions. ASME, 1B : General. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

  • Masiol, M., & Harrison, R. M. (2014). Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 95, 409–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, M. G., Westmoreland, P. R., & Feitelberg, A. S. (1992). Chemical mechanisms of NOx formation for gas turbine conditions. Symposium on Combustion, 24(1), 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. (2019). Rapid Refresh (RAP). Retrieved from https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/

  • Pecorari, E., Mantovani, A., Franceschini, C., Bassano, D., Palmeri, L., & Rampazzo, G. (2016). Analysis of the effetcs of meteorology on aircraft exhaust dispersion and deposition using a Lagrangian particle model. Sci Total Environ, 541, 839–856.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissman, J., Arunachalam, S., Woody, M., West, J. J., Bendor, T., & Binkowski, F. S. (2013). A plume-in-grid approach to characterize air quality impacts of aircraft emissions at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(18), 9285–9302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RWDI AIR Inc. (2009). 2007 Emissions Inventory Toronto Pearson International Airport. Toronto.

  • Sawyer, R. F., Cernansky, N. P., & Oppenheim, A. K. (1973). Factors controling pollutant emissions from gas turbine engines. AGARD Conference Proceedings No.125 "Atmospheric Pollution by aircraft engines". London.

  • Senzig, D. A., Fleming, G. G., & Iovinelli, R. J. (2009). Modeling of terminal-area airplane fuel consumption. Journal of Aircraft, 46(4), 1089–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti, I., Maltagliati, S., & Manfrida, G. (2015). Air quality impact of a middle size airport within an urban context through EDMS simulation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2016). Passengers enplaned and deplaned on selected services — Top 50 airports. Retrieved 10 26, 2017, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/51-203-x/2015000/t002-eng.htm

  • Steib, R., Labancz, K., Ferenczi, Z., & Alföldy, B. (2008). Airport (Budapest Ferihegy–Hungary) air quality analysis using the EDMS modeling system. Part I. Model development and testing. Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service, 112(2), 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). 40 CFR Part 80, 85, and 86, Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements; Final Rule. Federal Register, 65(28), 6698–6870.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). 40 CFR Part 80 Subpart I: Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel; Nonroad, Locomotive, and Marine Diesel Fuel; and ECA Marine Fuel.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). MOVES 2014a User Guide. EPA-420-B-15-095.

  • Unal, A., Hu, Y., Chang, M. E., Odman, M. T., & Russell, A. G. (2005). Airport related emissions and impacts on air quality: Application to the Atlanta International Airport. Atmospheric Environment, 39(32), 5787–5798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wayson, R. L., Fleming, G. G., & Iovinelli, R. (2009). Methodology to estimate particulate matter emissions from certified commercial aircraft engines. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 59(1), 91–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. C., Herndon, S. C., Timko, M. T., Yelvington, P. E., & Miake-Lye, R. C. (2008). Speciation and chemical evolution of nitrogen oxides in aircraft exhaust near airports. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(6), 1884–1891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Cheng, S., Lang, J., Xu, R., & Lv, Z. (2018). Characterization of aircraft emissions and air quality impacts of an international aiport. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 72, 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaworski, M. J., Dinges, E. P., & Iovinelli, R. J. (2011). High-Fidelity Weather Data Makes a Difference Calculating Environmental Consequences with FAA's Aviation Environmental Design Tool. Ninth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2011).

  • Yelvington, P. E., Herndon, S. C., Wormhoudt, J. C., Jayne, J. T., & Miake-Lye, R. C. (2007). Chemical Speciation of Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Commercial Aircraft Engine. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 23(5), 912–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Consortium for Research and Innovation in Aerospace in Quebec (CRIAQ) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for funding this project as well as our partners Aéroports de Montréal, Environment and Climate Change Canada, City of Montréal, Pratt & Whitney Canada and McGill University for their active collaboration.

Availability of Data and Material

“Not applicable”

Code Availability

“Not applicable”

Funding

This research was supported by:

Consortium for Research and Innovation in Aerospace in Quebec (CRIAQ)

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Henry-Lheureux.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henry-Lheureux, T., Seers, P., Ghedhaïfi, W. et al. Overview of Emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport and Impact of Local Weather on Related Pollutant Concentrations. Water Air Soil Pollut 232, 173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05087-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05087-2

Keywords

Navigation