Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of Sludge Reduction and Biogas Potential from Anaerobic Co-digestion Using an Acidogenically Fermented Fishery Byproduct with Various Agricultural Wastes

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fishery byproducts were acidogenically fermented with agricultural wastes (corncob, cabbage waste, and fruit peel), and fishery acidogenic fermentation broth (FFB) was used to observe sludge reduction and biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion. The experiment was conducted using a batch test for 30 days in mesophilic conditions. Samples with FFB showed a short response delay time of 1.50–3.06 (day), and total solid (TS) and volatile solid (VS) removal efficiencies of 23–43% and 20–30%, respectively, which were higher than those without FFB. In addition, the process produced 2.63–3.86 times more biogas with a methane content of over 70%. These results indicate that FFB improves the biodegradability of sewage sludge and that microbial communities were activated in a short time during the anaerobic co-digestion process. In particular, the highest TS and VS removal efficiency, biogas production, and high methane content were observed in FFB with corncobs. This suggests that nutrients such as sugar and minerals in corncobs may have positively affected the activity of methane-producing archaea. The anaerobic co-digestion process, which combines FFB and sewage sludge, enhanced the treatment efficiency of sludge and has an advantage of energy recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboudi, K., Álvarez-Gallego, C. J., & Romero-García, L. I. (2015). Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet byproduct and pig manure: effect of the organic loading rate (OLR) on process performance. Bioresource Technology, 194, 283–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adarme, O. F. H., Baêta, B. E. L., Filho, J. B. G., Gurgel, L. V. A., & de Aquino, S. F. (2019). Use of anaerobic co- digestion as an alternative to add value to sugarcane biorefinery wastes. Bioresource Technology, 287, 121443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. In E. W. Rice, R. B. Baird, A. D. Eaton, & L. S. Clesceri (Eds.), (22nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF).

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D7833–14 (n.d.). Standard test method for determination of hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon gases in gaseous mixtures by gas chromatography, active standard ASTM D7833 | Developed by Subcommittee: D03.07. Book of Standards Volume: 05.06, https://www.astm.org/standards/d7833.html.

  • Cadavid-Rodrígueza, L. S., Vargas-Muñoza, M. A., & Plácido, J. (2019). Biomethane from fish waste as a source of renewable energy for artisanal fishing communities. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 34, 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N., Zhang, G., Zhang, P., Tao, X., Wu, Y., Wang, S., & Nabi, M. (2019). Rice husk-based solid acid for efficient hydrolysis and saccharification of corncob. Bioresource Technology, 292, 121915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. J. (2020). Acid-fermented fish by-products broth: an influence to sludge reduction and biogas production in an anaerobic co-digestion. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. J. (2021). Influence of acidogenic fermented fish by-products with rice bran for sludge reduction and biogas recovery in anaerobic co-digestion. Environmental Engineering Research, 26(1), 190409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Advances in microalgal biomass/bioenergy production with agricultural by-products: analysis with various growth rate models. Environmental Engineering Research, 24(2), 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corato, U., De Bari, I., Viola, E., & Pugliese, M. (2018). Assessing the main opportunities of integrated biorefining from agro-bioenergy co/by-products and agroindustrial residues into high-value added products associated to some emerging markets: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88, 326–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maris, F., Sordi, A., Cirulli, G., & Micale, C. (2015). Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time. Applied Energy, 150, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban-Gutiérrez, M., Garcia-Aguirre, J., Irizar, I., & Aymerich, E. (2018). From sewage sludge and agri-food waste to VFA: individual acid production potential and up-scaling. Waste Management, 77, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevez, M. M., Sapci, Z., Linjordet, R., & Morken, J. (2014). Incorporation of fish by-product into the semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of pre-treated lignocellulose and cow manure, with recovery of digestate’s nutrients. Renewable Energy, 66, 550–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fountoulakis, M. S., Petousi, I., & Manios, T. (2010). Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol to boost biogas production. Waste Management, 30, 1849–1853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, A., Neczj, E., Singh, B. R., Almas, A. R., BrattebØ, H., & Kacprzak, M. (2017). Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge and municipal solid waste as co-substrates. Environmental Research, 155, 249–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka, T., Arai, S., Okamoto, S., & Ucida, T. (2013). Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with shredded grass from public green spaces. Bioresource Technology, 130, 667–672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, K. E., Barrantes, L. M., Eskicioglu, C., & Dutil, C. (2014). Mesophilic batch anaerobic co-digestion of fruit-juice industrial waste and municipal waste sludge: process and cost-benefit analysis. Bioresource Technology, 152, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovs, K., Spalvins, K., & Blumberga, D. (2018). Approach for modelling anaerobic digestion processes of fish waste. Energy Procedia, 147, 390–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kainthola, J., Kalamdhad, A. S., & Goud, V. V. (2016). Enhanced methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and hydrilla verticillata and its kinetic analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 125, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. H., Yoon, E. K., Muthusamy, M., Kim, J. A., & Lee, S. I. (2020). Blue LED light irradiation enhances L-ascorbic acid content while reducing reactive oxygen species accumulation in Chinese cabbage seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae, 261, 108924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, H., Baek, G., & Lee, C. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds with different waste feedstocks for biogas production. Waste Management, 60, 322–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latha, K., Velraj, R., Shanmugam, P., & Sivanesan, S. (2019). Mixing strategies of high solids anaerobic co-digestion using food waste with sewage sludge for enhanced biogas production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 388–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmer, A., Merkle, W., Baer, K., & Graf, F. (2017). Effects of high-pressure anaerobic digestion up to 30 bar on pH-value, production kinetics and specific methane yield. Energy, 138, 659–667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki, J. (2018). Renewable energy in the news: environmental, economic, policy and technology discussion of biogas. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mshandete, A., Kivaisi, A., Rubindamayugi, M., & Mattiasson, B. (2004). Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresource Technology, 95(1), 19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, L., Zhang, L., Zhu, K., Ma, J., & Li, A. (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, food waste and yard waste: synergistic enhancement on process stability and biogas production. Science of the Total Environment, 704, 135429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A., & Bhushan, B. (2019). An overview of the recent trends on the waste valorization techniques for food wastes. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 352–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Zhi, Z., Zhen, G., Lu, X., Bakonyi, P., Li, Y. Y., Zhao, Y., & Banu, J. R. (2019). Synergistic effect and biodegradation kinetics of sewage sludge and food waste mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion and the underlying stimulation mechanisms. Fuel, 253, 40–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seong, J. H., Park, S. G., Park, E. M., Kim, H. S., Kim, D. S., & Chung, H. S. (2006). Contents of chemical constituents in organic Korean cabbages. Korean Journal of Food Preservation, 13(5), 655–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, M. N. I., & Wahid, Z. A. (2018). Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 359–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stunzenas, E., & Kliopova, I. (2018). Optimizing municipal biodegradable waste management system to increase biogas output and nutrient recovery: a case study in Lithuania. Energy Procedia, 147, 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vats, N., Khan, A. A., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Effect of substrate ratio on biogas yield for anaerobic co-digestion of fruit vegetable waste & sugarcane bagasse. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 13, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Li, F., Zhang, S., Zhang, S., & Sun, R. (2019). Characterization of interspecific hybrids between Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) and red cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Scientia Horticulturae, 250, 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yenigün, O., & Demirel, B. (2013). Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochemistry, 48(5–6), 901–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., Yan, B., Wong, J. W. C., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Enhanced volatile fatty acids production from anaerobic fermentation of food waste: a mini-review focusing on acidogenic metabolic pathways. Bioresource Technology, 248, 68–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2019R1H1A280120).

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Hee-Jeong Choi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Software, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Writing—review and editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-Jeong Choi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, HJ. Assessment of Sludge Reduction and Biogas Potential from Anaerobic Co-digestion Using an Acidogenically Fermented Fishery Byproduct with Various Agricultural Wastes. Water Air Soil Pollut 231, 336 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04720-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04720-w

Keywords

Navigation