Accurately determining denitrification rates is essential for estimating the nitrogen budget in flooded ecosystems. The acetylene inhibition method (AIT) is a simple and common technique for measuring sediment denitrification. However, incomplete inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction or concurrent inhibition of nitrification may lead to underestimations of denitrification rates, whereas the N2:Ar ratio method with membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) provides an accurately way quantifying denitrification rates. The objective of this study was to compare sediment denitrification rates measured by AIT and MIMS, correspondingly quantify the underestimation and the uncertainty of AIT-measured denitrification by combining a Bayesian hierarchical method. A multilevel Bayesian framework was constructed to predict the true values of sediment denitrification based on the relationships between MIMS and AIT-measured denitrification. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was applied to obtain the targeted parameters and their associated uncertainties in the Bayesian. Results showed that both AIT and MIMS detected similar trends in denitrification responses to increasing NO3¯-N concentrations, but the values of denitrification measured by AIT were considerably lower than those of MIMS. These differences decreased rapidly with increasing NO3¯-N concentrations, then stabilized when NO3¯-N was greater than 2 mg N L−1 and AIT estimations of denitrification were about 21 times less than those of MIMS. The results were used to obtain a multilevel Bayesian model that quantified the underestimation and uncertainty of the AIT-based denitrification. We concluded that the AIT can be used to accurately estimate soil denitrification after quantification of system error and correction coefficients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Beck, J. L., & Au, S. K. (2002). Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(4), 380–391.
Bergsma, T. T., Ostrom, N. E., Emmons, M., & Robertson, G. P. (2001). Measuring simultaneous fluxes from soil of N2O and N2 in the field using the 15N-Gas “nonequilibrium” technique. Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 4307–4312.
Bernot, M. J., Dodds, W. K., Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., Sobolev, D., & Tank, J. L. (2003). Comparing denitrification estimates for a Texas estuary by using acetylene inhibition and membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(10), 5950–5956.
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434–455.
Colt, J. (1984). Computation of dissolved gas concentrations in water as functions of temperature, salinity, and pressure. (p. 14). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Special Publication.
Eyre, B. D., Rysgaard, S., Dalsgaard, T., & Christensen, P. B. (2002). Comparison of isotope pairing and N2/Ar methods for measuring sediment denitrification: Assumptions, modifications, and implications. Estuaries, 25, 1077–1087.
Gallagher, M., & Doherty, J. (2007). Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1000–1020.
Groffman, P. M., Altabet, M. A., Bhlke, J., Butterbach-Bahl, K., David, M. B., Firestone, M. K., Giblin, A. E., Kana, T. M., Nielsen, L. P., & Voytek, M. A. (2006). Methods for measuring denitrification: Diverse approaches to a difficult problem. Ecological Applications, 16, 2091–2122.
Groffman, P. M., Holland, E., Myrold, D. D., Robertson, G. P., & Zou, X. (1999). Denitrification. In G. P. Robertson, C. S. Bledsoe, D. C. Coleman, & P. Sollins (Eds.), Standard soil methods for long term ecological research (pp. 272–288). New York: Oxford University press, New York.
Kana, T. M., Darkangelo, C., Hunt, M. D., Oldham, J. B., Bennett, G. E., & Cornwell, J. C. (1994). Membrane inlet mass spectrometer for rapid high precision determination of N2, O2, and Ar in environmental water samples. Analytical Chemistry, 66, 4166–4170.
Kana, T. M., Sullivan, M. B., Cornwell, J. C., & Groszkowski, K. M. (1998). Denitrification in estuarine sediments determined by membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Limnology and Oceanography, 43, 334–339.
Laverman, A. M., Garnier, J. A., Mounier, E. M., & Roose-Amsaleg, C. L. (2010). Nitrous oxide production kinetics during nitrate reduction in river sediments. Water Research, 44, 1753–1764.
Li, X. B., Xia, Y. Q., Li, Y. F., Kana, T. M., Kimura, S. D., Saito, M., & Yan, X. Y. (2013). Sediment denitrification in waterways in a rice-paddy-dominated watershed in eastern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13, 783–792.
Qin, S. P., Hu, C. S., & Oenema, O. (2012). Quantifying the underestimation of soil denitrification potential as determined by the acetylene inhibition method. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 47, 14–17.
Richards, F. A., & Benson, B. B. (1961). Nitrogen/argon and nitrogen isotope ratios in two anaerobic environments, the Cariaco Trench in the Caribbean Sea and Dramsfjord, Norway. Deep-Sea Research, 7, 254–264.
Rudolph, J., Frenzel, P., & Pfenning, N. (1991). Acetylene inhibition technique underestimates in situ denitrification rates in intact cores of freshwater sediments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85, 101–106.
Seitzinger, S. P. (1998). Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: Ecological and geochemical significance. Limnology and Oceanography, 33, 702–724.
Seitzinger, S. P., Nielsen, L. P., Caffrey, J., & Christensen, P. B. (1993). Denitrification measurements in aquatic sediments: A comparison of three methods. Biogeochemistry, 23, 147–167.
Sgouridis, F., Stott, A., & Ullah, S. (2016). Application of the 15N gas-flux method for measuring in situ N2 and N2O fluxes due to denitrification in natural and semi-natural terrestrial ecosystems and comparison with the acetylene inhibition technique. Biogeosciences, 13, 1821–1835.
Smith, L. K., Voytek, M. A., Bòhlke, J. K., & Harvey, J. W. (2006). Denitrification in nitrate-rich streams: Application of N2:Ar and 15N-tracer methods in intact cores. Ecological Applications, 16(6), 2191–2207.
Van den Heuvel, R. N., Bakker, S. E., Jetten, M. S. M., & Hefting, M. M. (2011). Decreased N2O reduction by low soil pH causes high N2O emissions in a riparian ecosystem. Geobiology, 9, 294–300.
Watts, S. H., & Seitzinger, S. P. (2000). Denitrification rates in organic and mineral soils from riparian sites: A comparison of N2 flux and acetylene inhibition methods. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 32, 1383–1392.
Xia, Y. Q., Li, Y. F., Li, X. B., Guo, M., She, D. L., & Yan, X. Y. (2013). Diurnal pattern in nitrous oxide emissions from a sewage-enriched river. Chemosphere, 92(4), 421–428.
Xia, Y. Q., Weller, D. E., Williams, M. N., Jordan, T. E., & Yan, X. Y. (2016). Using Bayesian hierarchical models to better understand nitrate sources and sinks in agricultural watersheds. Water Research, 105, 527–539.
Yan, X. Y., Cai, Z. C., Yang, R., Ti, C. P., Xia, Y. Q., Li, F. Y., Wang, J. Q., & Ma, A. J. (2011). Nitrogen budget and riverine nitrogen output in a rice paddy dominated agricultural watershed in eastern China. Biogeochemistry, 106(3), 489–501.
Yoshinari, T., Hynes, R., & Knowles, R. (1977). Acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction and measurement of denitrification and nitrogen fixation in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 9, 177–183.
Zhao, Y. Q., Xia, Y. Q., Li, B. L., & Yan, X. Y. (2014). Influence of environmental factors on net N2 and N2O production in sediment of freshwater rivers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(16), 9973–9982.
Zhou, S., Sakiyama, Y., Riya, S., Song, X. F., Terada, A., & Hosomi, M. (2012). Assessing nitrification and denitrification in a paddy soil with different water dynamics and applied liquid cattle waste using the 15N isotopic technique. Science of the Total Environment, 430, 93–100.
This study is financially supported by the National Key Basic Research Project of China (No. 2015CB158200), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20161503), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018B12214), and the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
She, D., Sun, X. & Xia, Y. Combining N2:Ar and Bayesian Methods to Quantify Underestimation and Uncertainty of Sediment Denitrification Determined by the Acetylene Inhibition Method. Water Air Soil Pollut 230, 52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4100-6
- Bayesian hierarchical models
- Sediment denitrification
- Acetylene inhibition
- Membrane inlet mass spectrometry