Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Several Amendments for In-Site Remediating Chromium-Contaminated Farmland Soil

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), which has been classified as a Group A human carcinogens list by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, possesses stronger biological toxicity, and its discharge into farmland has become a pressing environmental problems. To screen the cost-efficient Cr(VI)-contaminated soil in situ amended materials, the effects of ordinary zero-valent iron (ZVI), nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI), biochar (B), biochar/zero-valent iron (BZVI), and biochar/nanoscale zero-valent iron (BnZVI) on the immobilization of Cr(VI) in spiked soil (Cr(VI) = 325 mg kg−1, Crtotal = 640 mg kg−1) were compared in this paper. After 15 days remediation by those materials, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure and physiological-based extraction test showed that the Cr(VI) leachability and bioaccessibility were reduced by 14–92% and 4.3–92% respectively, and the order of immobilization was found to be nZVI > BnZVI > BZVI > ZVI > B. Moreover, sequential extraction procedure indicated that all materials can increase the proportion of the residual Cr, and nZVI had the most significant effect. Plant seedling growth test proved that the nanoscale zero-valent iron was able to reduce the toxicity of chromium in plants greatly in a short time, while BnZVI treatment is more favorable to the growth of plants. To sum up, the nano zero-valent iron and biochar combined treatment not only removed Cr(VI) and immobilized total chromium efficiently but also enabled plant growth in relative high chromium-containing soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chrysochoou, M., Johnston, C. P., & Dahal, G. (2012). A comparative evaluation of hexavalent chromium treatment in contaminated soil by calcium polysulfide and green-tea nanoscale zero-valent iron. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 201-202, 33–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhal, B., Thatoi, H. N., Das, N. N., & Pandey, B. D. (2013). Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 250, 272–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, D., Zhao, X., Hua, X., Liu, J. F., & Gao, M. (2009). Investigation of the potential mobility of Pb, Cd and Cr(VI) from moderately contaminated farmland soil to groundwater in northeast, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 162, 1261–1268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X., Ma, L. Q., & Li, Y. (2011). Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 190, 909–915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., Qiu, X., Chen, J., & Qiu, X. (2011a). Debromination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by Ni/Fe bimetallic nanoparticles: influencing factors, kinetics, and mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185, 958–969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., Qiu, X., Chen, J., & Qiu, X. (2011b). Degradation of the polybrominated diphenyl ethers by nanoscale zero-valent metallic particles prepared from steel pickling waste liquor. Desalination, 267, 34–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girish, C., Nanthi, B., Dane, L., & Kunhikrishnan, A. (2013). Comparative sorption and mobility of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) species in a range of soils: implications to bioavailability. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 224.

  • He, F., & Zhao, D. (2007). Manipulating the size and dispersibility of zerovalent iron nanoparticles by use of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilizers. Environmental Science &Technology, 41, 6216–6221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jurate, K., Solvita, O., Renella, G., Mench, M., Lagerkvist, A., & Maurice, C. (2006). Assessment of zerovalent iron for stabilization of chromium, copper, and arsenic in soil. Environmental Pollution, 144, 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrough, D. E., Cohen, Y., Winer, A. M., & Creelman, L. (1999). A critical assessment of chromium in the environment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 29, 1–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotas, J., & Stasicka, Z. (2000). Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environmental Pollution, 107, 263–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klasson, K. T., Ledbetter, C. A., Uchimiya, M., & Lima, I. M. (2013). Activated biochar removes 100% dibromochloropropane from field well water. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 11(3), 271–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. E., Brauning, S., Schoof, R., & Ruby, M. (2002). Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil. USA: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, K., Yang, X., Shen, J., Robinson, B., Huang, H., Liu, D., Bolan, N., Pei, J., & Wang, H. (2014). Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn to Sedum plumbizincicola. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 191, 124–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, X. S., Xu, J., & Jiang, G. M. (2011). Removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater by nanoscale zero-valent iron particles supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere, 85(7), 1204–1209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., & Zhao, D. (2007). In situ immobilization of Cu(II) in soils using a new class of iron phosphate nanoparticles. Chemosphere, 68, 1867–1876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Gurung, A., & Deng, Y. (2013). Phytotoxicity and uptake of nanoscale zero-valentiron (nZVI) by two plant species. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 844–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. V. V. V., Das, C. D., & Golder, A. K. (2011). Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) and removal of total chromium from wastewater using scrap iron in the form of zerovalent iron (ZVI): batch and column studies. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 89(6), 1575–1582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyhanitabar, A., Alidokht, L., Khataee, A., & Oustan, S. (2012). Application of stabilized Fe0 nanoparticles for remediation of Cr (VI)-spiked soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 63, 724–732.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, H. K., & Lee, S. M. (2014). Magnetic biochar composite: facile synthesis, characterization, and application for heavy metal removal. Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 454, 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, A. K., Cervantes, C., Loza-Tavera, H., & Avudainayagam, S. (2005). Chromium toxicity in plants. Environment International, 31, 739–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H., Fang, Z., Tsang, P. E., Zheng, L., Cheng, W., Fang, J., & Zhao, D. (2016). Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by biochar-supported zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 318, 533–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA, T. C. L. P. (1992). EPA Method 1311. Washington: US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Zhu, W., Kookana, R., & Katayama, A. (2013). Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. Bioscience and Bioengineering, 116, 653–659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G., & Bisson, M. (1979). Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry., 51, 844–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. J., Zhang, J. H., & Tong, Y. F. (2009b). Chromium (VI) reduction in aqueous solutions by Fe3 O4—stabilized Fe0 nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2–3), 1640–1645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Fang, Z. Q., Kang, Y., & Tsang, E. P. (2014). Immobilization and phytotoxicity of chromium in contaminated soil remediated by CMC-stabilized NZVI. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 275, 230–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C. H., Zhu, L. J., Wang, X. H., Lin, S., Chen, Y. M., & Xu, A. F. (2014). Fast and highly efficient removal of chromate from aqueous solution using nanoscale zero-valent iron/activated carbon (NZVI/AC). Water Air and Soil Pollution, 225(2), 1845–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y. Y., Fang, Z. Q., Qiu, X. H., Tsang, E. P., & Liang, B. (2014). Comparisons of the reactivity, reusability and stability of four different zero-valent iron-based nanoparticles. Chemosphere, 108, 433–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Fang, Z., Tsang, E. P., Fang, J., & Zhao, D. Y. (2016). In situ remediation and phytotoxicity assessment of lead-contaminated soil by biochar-supported nHAP. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 247–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zayed, A., Lytle, C. M., Qian, J. H., & Terry, N. (1998). Chromium accumulation, translocation and chemical speciation in vegetable crops. Planta, 206, 293–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Guangzhou External Science and Technology Cooperation Project (2016201604030002) and the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, China (2016A020221029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanqiang Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, N., Fang, Z. & Zhang, R. Comparison of Several Amendments for In-Site Remediating Chromium-Contaminated Farmland Soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 228, 400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3571-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3571-6

Keywords

Navigation