Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contribution of Coagulation–Flocculation Process for a More Sustainable Pig Slurry Management

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate the benefits of using a natural coagulant to enhance gravitational sedimentation of pig slurry. The separation process would lead to a liquid fraction, more biodegradable and with lower nutrient content, and a solid fraction highly concentrated in organic matter. Experimental trials were conducted in order to achieve the following objectives: (i) compare the effect of gravitational sedimentation with coagulation–flocculation process, (ii) compare the efficiency of conventional coagulants (such as aluminium sulphate or ferric chloride) with chitosan biopolymer and (iii) test the optimum coagulation–flocculation operational conditions to slurry sample. Assessment criteria included removal efficiencies but also took into consideration the advantages/disadvantages regarding sludge management. Results showed that gravitational sedimentation process can be improved by addition of coagulants; turbidity and COD removal increased around 2 and 3 times, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation (21st ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. H. (2007). The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure. Livestock Science, 112 (3), 208–216.

  • Daumer, M. L., Picard, S., Saint-Cast, P., & Dabert, P. (2010). Technical and economical assessment of formic acid to recycle phosphorus from pig slurry by a combined acidification–precipitation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 180, 361–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinuccio, E., Balsari, P., & Berg, W. (2008). GHG emissions during the storage of rough pig slurry and the fractions obtained by mechanical separation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48, 93–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fangueiro, D., Lopes, C., Surgy, S., & Vasconcelos, E. (2012). Effect of the pig slurry separation techniques on the characteristics and potential availability of N to plants in the resulting liquid and solid fractions. Biosystems Engineering, 113, 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. C., Szogi, A. A., Vanotti, M. B., Chastain, J. P., & Millner, P. D. (2009). Enhanced solid–liquid separation of dairy manure with natural flocculants. Bioresource Technology, 100, 5417–5423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Fernández, C., Nieto-Diez, P. P., Léon-Cofreces, C., & Garcia-Encina, P. A. (2008). Solids and nutrients removals from the liquid fraction of swine slurry through screening and flocculation treatment and influence of these processes on anaerobic biodegradability. Bioresource Technology, 99, 6233–6239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, N. J., Hoeve, M., Jensen, R., Bruun, S., & Søtoft, L. F. (2013). Modelling the potential of slurry management technologies to reduce the constraints of environmental legislation on pig production. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 447–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, K., & Jensen, L. S. (2009). Chemical and biochemical variation in animal manure solids separated using different commercial separation technologies. Bioresource Technology, 100, 3088–3096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. S., & Han, G. B. (2012). Pig slurry treatment by a hybrid multi-stage unit system consisting of an ATAD and an EGSB followed by a SBR reactor. Biosystems Engineering, 111, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J., Burton, C. H., Sneath, R. W., & Farrent, J. W. (1995). A study of the potential contribution of sedimentation to aerobic treatment processes for pig slurry. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 61, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, H. B., Lund, I., & Sommer, S. G. (2000). Solid–liquid separation of livestock slurry: efficiency and cost. Bioresource Technology, 74, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndegwa, P., Zhu, J., & Luo, A. (2001). Effects of solid levels and chemical additives on removal of solids and phosphorus in swine manure. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 127, 1111–1115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Provolo, G., & Martínez-Suller, L. (2007). In situ determination of slurry nutrient content by electrical conductivity. Bioresource Technology, 98, 3235–3242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, F., Sancey, B., Badot, P. M., & Crini, G. (2009). Chitosan for coagulation-flocculation processes—an eco-friendly approach. European Polymer Journal, 45, 1337–1348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riaño, B., & García-González, M. C. (2014). On-farm treatment of swine manure based on solid-liquid separation and biological nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction. Journal of Environmental Management, 132, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, M., & González, J. L. (2005). The fertilizer value of pig slurry. I. Values depending on the type of operation. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1117–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velthof, G. L., Lesschen, J. P., Webb, J., Pietrzak, S., Miatkowski, Z., Pinto, M., Kros, J., & Oenema, O. (2014). The impact of the nitrates directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008. Science of the Total Environment, 468–469, 1225–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P. M., Wade, C. A., & Kelley, T. R. (2010). Evaluation of a polyacrylamide assisted solid/liquid separation system for the treatment of liquid pig manure. Biosystems Engineering, 105, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagüe, M. R., Bosch-Serra, À. D., & Boixadera, J. (2012). Measurement and estimation of the fertiliser value of pig slurry by physicochemical models: usefulness and constraints. Biosystems Engineering, 111, 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R. H., & Westerman, P. W. (1997). Solid-liquid separation of animal manure for odor control and nutrient. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 13, 657–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Gamal El-Din, M., Moawad, A. K., & Bromley, D. (2004). Physical and chemical processes for removing suspended solids and phosphorus from liquid swine manure. Environmental Technology, 25, 1177–1187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Domingos Figueiredo for his support during the analytical procedures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia de Biossistemas, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal

    R. A. Fragoso, E. A. Duarte & J. Paiva

Authors
  1. R. A. Fragoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Duarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Paiva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Fragoso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fragoso, R.A., Duarte, E.A. & Paiva, J. Contribution of Coagulation–Flocculation Process for a More Sustainable Pig Slurry Management. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2388-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2388-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation