Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 226:2257 | Cite as

Aluminum Alginate–Montmorillonite Composite Beads for Defluoridation of Water

  • Hakan KaygusuzEmail author
  • Meryem Hilal Çoşkunırmak
  • Nilay Kahya
  • F. Bedia Erim


A novel alginate–montmorillonite biopolymer-clay composite bead formulation for water defluoridation was developed in this study. Montmorillonite was dispersed alginate solution, and the mixture was cross-linked in an aqueous solution of aluminum(III). The resulting cross-linked beads were characterized using FTIR, SEM, and mechanical measurements. In order to reveal the defluoridation capacity of the beads, batch adsorption experiments were carried out. Optimum conditions and effect of competing ions were investigated. Experimental data were modeled using several isothermal, kinetic, and thermodynamic models. Maximum Langmuir adsorption capacity was reached as 31.0 mg g−1 at 25 °C. It is also found that the adsorption is physical in nature and follows the Elovich kinetic model, and the fluoride removal efficiency is not affected by the presence of most competing anions. The results show that aluminum alginate–montmorillonite composite beads can be used as effective and natural sorbents for fluoride removal from water.


Fluoride Adsorption Montmorillonite Alginate Removal 


  1. Bajpai, S. K., & Sharma, S. (2004). Investigation of swelling/degradation behaviour of alginate beads crosslinked with Ca2+ and Ba2+ ions. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 59, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar, A., Kumar, E., & Sillanpää, M. (2011). Fluoride removal from water by adsorption—a review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3), 811–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bia, G., De Pauli, C. P., & Borgnino, L. (2012). The role of Fe(III) modified montmorillonite on fluoride mobility: adsorption experiments and competition with phosphate. Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas, K., Gupta, K., Goswami, A., & Ghosh, U. C. (2010). Fluoride removal efficiency from aqueous solution by synthetic iron(III)–aluminum(III)–chromium(III) ternary mixed oxide. Desalination, 255(1–3), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, E. S., Lim, T. K., Voo, W. P., Pogaku, R., Tey, B. T., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Effect of formulation of alginate beads on their mechanical behavior and stiffness. Particuology, 9(3), 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chien, S. H., & Clayton, W. R. (1980). Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(2), 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubinin, M. M. (1960). The potential theory of adsorption of gases and vapors for adsorbents with energetically non-uniform surface. Chemical Reviews, 60(2), 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubinin, M. M., & Radushkevich, L. V. (1947). The equation of the characteristic curve of activated charcoal. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Physical Chemistry Section, 55, 331–337.Google Scholar
  9. Evingür, G. A., Kaygusuz, H., Erim, F. B., & Pekcan, Ö. (2014). Effect of calcium Ion concentration on small molecule desorption from alginate beads. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B: Physics, 53(7), 1157–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freundlich, H. M. F. (1906). Über die adsorption in Lösungen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 57(A), 385–470.Google Scholar
  11. Hamadi, N. K., Chen, X. D., Farid, M. M., & Lu, M. G. Q. (2001). Adsorption kinetics for the removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution by adsorbents derived from used tyres and sawdust. Chemical Engineering Journal, 84(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hena, S. (2010). Removal of chromium hexavalent ion from aqueous solutions using biopolymer chitosan coated with poly 3-methyl thiophene polymer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181(1–3), 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hertz, H. (1882). Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Zeitschrift für Reine Angewandte Mathematik, 92, 156–171.Google Scholar
  14. Huo, Y., Ding, W., Huang, X., Xu, J., & Zhao, M. (2011). Fluoride removal by lanthanum alginate bead: adsorbent characterization and adsorption mechanism. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 19(3), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karthikeyan, G., Pius, A., & Alagumuthu, G. (2005). Fluoride adsorption studies of montmorillonite clay. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 12, 263–272.Google Scholar
  16. Kaygusuz, H., & Erim, F. B. (2013). Alginate/BSA/montmorillonite composites with enhanced protein entrapment and controlled release efficiency. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 73(11), 1420–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilislioglu, A., & Bilgin, B. (2003). Thermodynamic and kinetic investigations of uranium adsorption on amberlite IR-118H resin. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 58(2), 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lagergren, S. (1898). Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 24, 1–39.Google Scholar
  19. Langmuir, I. (1918). The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 40(9), 1361–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohapatra, M., Anand, S., Mishra, B. K., Giles, D. E., & Singh, P. (2009). Review of fluoride removal from drinking water. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ouwerx, C., Velings, N., Mestdagh, M. M., & Axelos, M. A. V. (1998). Physico-chemical properties and rheology of alginate gel beads formed with various divalent cations. Polymer Gels and Networks, 6, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rocher, V., Siaugue, J. M., Cabuli, V., & Bee, A. (2008). Removal of organic dyes by magnetic alginate beads. Water Research, 42(4–5), 1290–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Temkin, M. J., & Pyzhev, V. (1940). Recent modifications to Langmuir isotherms. Acta Physicochimica URSS, 12, 217–222.Google Scholar
  24. Teutli-Sequeira, A., Solache-Ríos, M., & Balderas-Hernández, P. (2012). Modification effects of hematite with aluminum hydroxide on the removal of fluoride ions from water. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(1), 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tseng, R.-L., & Wu, F.-C. (2008). Inferring the favorable adsorption level and the concurrent multi-stage process with the Freundlich constant. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 155, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uzaşçı, S., Tezcan, F., & Erim, F. B. (2013). Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by barium ion cross-linked alginate beads. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. doi: 10.1007/s13762-013-0377-y.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, W. J., & Morris, J. C. (1963). Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, 89(2), 31–60.Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization (2006). Fluoride in drinking-water Eds. Fawell, J., Bailey, K., Chilton, J., Dahi, E., Fewtrell, L., Magara, Y. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hakan Kaygusuz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meryem Hilal Çoşkunırmak
    • 1
  • Nilay Kahya
    • 1
  • F. Bedia Erim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslakTurkey

Personalised recommendations