Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 225:2087 | Cite as

Arsenic Aquifer Sealing Technology in Wells: A Sustainable Mitigation Option

  • Mahesh Neupane
  • Jay Krishna Thakur
  • Amrita Gautam
  • Amrita Dhakal
  • Madhav Pahari


The act of constructing unprotected/unsealed wells to extract water from deep aquifers is a worrisome ongoing practice in most parts of developing countries of the globe. The paper is first of its kind in exploring sealing technology as a potential mitigation measure to prevent arsenic contamination of deep aquifers. The technology has been assessed not only as a safeguard to potential microbiological or mineralogical contamination of aquifers but also as an adaptive option in case of climate-induced disasters like drought or flood where it can serve as emergency safe drinking water source. This paper puts forward comparative findings of mini-arsenic blanket testing of 358 wells (unsealed) performed at an interval of 8 years in Nawalparasi, district of Nepal, along with the performance monitoring of eight different sealed wells ranging from 20 to 80 m deep for over a period of 7 years. The paper focuses on the construction methodology and performance evaluation of four sealed shallow wells constructed in the same district. Mini-arsenic blanket test results show 38, 37, and 25 % of bore wells with respective increasing, decreasing, and constant level of arsenic concentrations whereas the sealed wells exhibit steadiness in arsenic concentration range of particular tapped aquifers within Nepal drinking water quality standard for arsenic of 50 μg/l over a long period, even though the tapped aquifers lie intercepted in between adjacent arsenic elevated aquifers. Sealed shallow wells exhibit good aquifer seal characteristics beyond potential resultant existing positive difference to cause downward aquifer cross-contamination. The presented technology can be used and replicated in deep/multi-aquifer hydrogeology of Nepal and South Asia for extraction of water from deep and safer aquifers in rural and urban water supply systems by escaping overlying arsenic-contaminated aquifers.


Arsenic Aquifer contamination Sealing technology 


  1. ASTM. (2010). D 5092- 04(2010)e1.Standard practice for design and installation of groundwater monitoring well. West Conshohocken, PA, 19428–2959 USA, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).Google Scholar
  2. Berg, M., Tran, H. C., et al. (2001). Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: a human health threat. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(13), 2621–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutt, D. F., Hyndman, D. W., et al. (2001). Identifying potential land use-derived solute sources to stream baseflow using ground water models and GIS. Ground Water, 39(1), 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunner, P., Franssen, H.-J. H., et al. (2007). How can remote sensing contribute in groundwater modeling? Hydrogeology Journal, 15(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CBS. (2011). Nepal—National Population & Housing Census 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  6. Chenini, I., Mammou, A. B., et al. (2010). Groundwater recharge zone mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: a case study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin). Water Resources Management, 24(5), 921–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danert, K., Luutu, A., et al. (2010). Costing and pricing—a guide for water well drilling enterprises : RWSN Field Note 2010–6 (Cost Effective Boreholes Series). St Gallen, Switzerland, RWSN.Google Scholar
  8. DENR. (2003). Standard operating procedure-three: monitoring well design and installation. South Dhaka, Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Government of Bangladesh: 14.Google Scholar
  9. Farooqi, A., Masuda, H., et al. (2007). Toxic fluoride and arsenic contaminated groundwater in the Lahore and Kasur districts, Punjab, Pakistan and possible contaminant sources. Environmental Pollution, 145(3), 839–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurung, J. K., Ishiga, H., et al. (2005). Geological and geochemical examination of arsenic contamination in groundwater in the Holocene Terai Basin, Nepal. Environmental Geology, 49(1), 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hue, N. V. (2013). Arsenic chemistry and remediation in Hawaiian soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 15(2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaiswal, R., Mukherjee, S., et al. (2003). Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development—an approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(5), 993–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolliffe, I. (2005). Principal component analysis. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  14. Knappett, P. S., McKay, L. D., et al. (2012). Unsealed tubewells lead to increased fecal contamination of drinking water. Journal of Water and Health, 10(4), 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, P., Kumar, M., et al. (2010). Tracing the factors responsible for arsenic enrichment in groundwater of the middle Gangetic Plain, India: a source identification perspective. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 32(2), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawoti, S. S. (2006). Diluting the pain of arsenic poisoning in Nepal. From http://www.unicef.org/wash/nepal_35975.html.
  17. Maharjan, M. (2012). Community involvement of sustainable arsenic safe drinking water in lowland. Kathmandu: Environment and Public Health Organization (ENPHO).Google Scholar
  18. Maharjan, M., Shrestha, R. R., et al. (2011). Prevalence of arsenicosis in Terai, Nepal. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition (JHPN), 24(2), 246–252.Google Scholar
  19. Meharg, A. A., & Rahman, M. M. (2003). Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh paddy field soils: implications for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(2), 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael, H. A., & Voss, C. I. (2008). Evaluation of the sustainability of deep groundwater as an arsenic-safe resource in the Bengal Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(25), 8531–8536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NAISU. (2003). Arsenic 2002—an overview of arsenic mitigation initiatives in Bangladesh NGOs Arsenic Information & Support Unit (NAISU) and NGO forum for drinking water supply & sanitation: 125.Google Scholar
  22. NASC. (2007). Report on blanket tube well testing in Sunsari, Bara, Dhanusha, Rupandehi, Kailali & Kanchanpur district, Nepal, National Arsenic Steering Committee (NASC), Nepal.Google Scholar
  23. NASC. (2011). The State of Arsenic in Nepal, National Arsenic Steering Committee (NASC), Department of Water Supply and Sewerage, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  24. Nath, B., Sahu, S., et al. (2008). Hydrochemistry of arsenic-enriched aquifer from Rural West Bengal, India: a study of the arsenic exposure and mitigation option. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 190(1–4), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ngai, T. K., Shrestha, R. R., et al. (2007). Design for sustainable development—household drinking water filter for arsenic and pathogen treatment in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 42(12), 1879–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pokhrel, D., Bhandari, B. S., et al. (2009). Arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Terai region of Nepal: an overview of health concerns and treatment options. Environment International, 35(1), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polizzotto, M. L., Kocar, B. D., et al. (2008). Near-surface wetland sediments as a source of arsenic release to ground water in Asia. Nature, 454(7203), 505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polya, D., Gault, A., et al. (2005). Arsenic hazard in shallow Cambodian groundwaters. Mineralogical Magazine, 69(5), 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravenscroft, P. (2007). Predicting the global distribution of arsenic pollution in groundwater. Royal Geographical Society Annual International Conference, Department of Geography, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  30. Santi, P., McCray, J., et al. (2006). Investigating cross-contamination of aquifers. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seddique, A. A., Masuda, H., et al. (2011). Mineralogy and geochemistry of shallow sediments of Sonargaon, Bangladesh and implications for arsenic dynamics: focusing on the role of organic matter. Applied Geochemistry, 26(4), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh, P., Thakur, J. K., et al. (2013). Delineating groundwater potential zones in a hard-rock terrain using geospatial tool. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(1), 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swartz, C. H., Blute, N. K., et al. (2004). Mobility of arsenic in a Bangladesh aquifer: inferences from geochemical profiles, leaching data, and mineralogical characterization. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68(22), 4539–4557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thakur, J. K., Thakur, R. K., et al. (2011). Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Nepal—an overview. Water, 3(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thakur, J. K., Singh, P., et al. (2013). Geochemical modelling of fluoride concentration in hard rock terrain of Madhya Pradesh, India. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 87(5), 1421–1433.Google Scholar
  36. WECS. (2011). Water resources of Nepal in the context of climate change 2011. Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal, Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS), Government of Nepal: 89.Google Scholar
  37. WHO. (2000). Global water supply and sanitation assessment (p. 87). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).Google Scholar
  38. Winkel, L. H. E., Trang, P. T. K., et al. (2011). Arsenic pollution of groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep aquifer exploitation for more than a century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(4), 1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wold, S., Esbensen, K., et al. (1987). Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2(1–3), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank, T. (2005). Arsenic contamination of groundwater in South and East Asian Countries. Volume II Technical Report, The World Bank, Environmental and Social Unit - South Asia Region and Water and Sanitation Progam (WSP), South and East Asia. II.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank, T. (2014). World development indicators. Retrieved 13 Jan 2014, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx.
  42. WSSD. (2011). Water supply, sanitation and hygiene: sector status report Water Supply & Sanitation Division (WSSD), Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Government of Nepal.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahesh Neupane
    • 1
  • Jay Krishna Thakur
    • 2
  • Amrita Gautam
    • 3
  • Amrita Dhakal
    • 4
  • Madhav Pahari
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Water Supply and Sewerage (DWSS)Government of NepalKathmanduNepal
  2. 2.Environment and Information Technology Centre—UIZBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ITT)Cologne University of Applied SciencesCologneGermany
  4. 4.Nursing Campus, Institute of Medicine (IOM)Tribhuwan UniversityKathmanduNepal
  5. 5.United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF)LalitpurNepal

Personalised recommendations