Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Hydraulic and Toxic Metal Removal Capacities of Bioretention Cells After 2 to 8 Years of Service

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioretention cells, also known as raingardens, are increasingly being constructed as a means to collect, infiltrate, and treat stormwater runoff. There are concerns, however, about how stormwater management practices might function in terms of infiltration and pollutant removal as they age. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat) values were obtained for eight cells in 2006 and again for three of those cells in 2010 using an infiltrometer. A strong positive correlation of mean K sat with service time was observed (slope = 10.2 ± 2.4 cm/h per year, R 2 = 0.67). Results from metals analyses of bioretention media cores collected from six bioretention cells showed the expected trend of Cu and Zn enrichment at the surface while Cd was detected only in one out of 72 media samples analyzed. Sorption isotherms from batch testing of field media samples (T = 22.5 °C, pH = 7.2) were used to estimate metal sorption capacities based on representative stormwater Cd and Zn concentrations. Cu was not considered, as very little of the metal is dissolved under these conditions (22.8 ± 7.1 %). The mean equilibrium sorption capacities for Cd (10.2 ± 3.1 mg/kg) and Zn (294.9 ± 14.9 mg/kg) far exceeded observed levels in the bioretention media such that the remaining sorption capacity was ≥83 % for Zn and ≥90 % for Cd for the cells. Overall, the results of this investigation suggest that bioretention cells can provide many years of effective infiltration (>6 years) and metals removal performance (>25 years).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amrhein, C., Strong, J. E., & Mosher, P. A. (1992). Effect of deicing salts on metal and organic matter mobilization in roadside soils. Environmental Science and Technology, 26(4), 703–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, N. A. L., Quinton, J. N., & Hess, T. M. (2002). Below-ground relationships of soil texture, roots and hydraulic conductivity in two-phase mosaic vegetation in South-east Spain. Journal of Arid Environments, 52(4), 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asare, S. N., Rudra, R. P., Dickinson, W. T., & Wall, G. J. (1999). Effect of freeze–thaw cycle on the parameters of the Green and Ampt infiltration equation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asleson, B. C., Nestingen, R. S., Gulliver, J. S., Hozalski, R. M., & Nieber, J. L. (2009). Performance assessment of rain gardens. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45(4), 1019–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., & Ni, S. B. (2001). Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere, 44(5), 997–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., & Winogradoff, D. (2003). Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal. Water Environment Research, 78(3), 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2006). Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(4), 1335–1340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dingman, S. L. (2002). Physical hydrology. Prentice-Hall, (2nd), New Jersey, USA.

  • Emerson, C. H., & Traver, R. G. (2008). Multiyear and seasonal variation of infiltration from storm-water best management practices. ASCE Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 134(5), 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration (FAWB). (2009). Stormwater bioinfiltration systems. Melbourne, Australia: Adorption Guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, C., and Bissouma, S. (2005). Evaluation of a parking lot bioretention cell for removal of stormwater pollutants. In: Ecosystems and Sustainable Development V, pp. 699–708.

  • Gregory, J. H., Dukes, M. D., Jones, P. H., & Miller, G. L. (2006). Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 61(3), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., & Deletic, A. (2007). Treatment performance of gravel filter media: implications for design and application of stormwater infiltration systems. Water Research, 41(12), 2513–2524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heier, L. S., Lien, I. B., Stromseng, A. E., Ljones, M., Rosseland, B. O., Tollefsen, K.-E., et al. (2009). Speciation of lead, copper, zinc and antimony in water draining a shooting range—time dependant metal accumulation and biomarker responses in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Science of the Total Environment, 407(13), 4047–4055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E. Y., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P. (2006). Sustainable oil and grease removal from synthetic stormwater runoff using bench-scale bioretention studies. Water Environment Research, 78(2), 141–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. S., & Davis, A. P. (2013). Spatial accumulation and strength of affiliation of heavy metals in bioretention media. Environmental Science and Technology, 139(4), 479–487.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kayhanian, M., Suverkropp, C., Ruby, A., & Tsay, K. (2007). Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 279–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klute, A. (1986). Methods of soil analysis: Part I (Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edition). Madison: Soil Science Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamande, M., Hallaire, V., Curmi, P., Peres, G., & Cluzeau, D. (2003). Changes of pore morphology, infiltration and earthworm community in a loamy soil under different agricultural managements. Catena, 54(3), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, G., Haberl, R., Laber, J., & Pressl, A. (2003). Evaluation of substrate clogging processes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 48(5), 25–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coustumer, S., Fletcher, T. D., Deletic, A., Barraud, S., & Lewis, J. F. (2009). Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation. Journal of Hydrology, 376(1–2), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, G. H., Novak, P. J., & Hozalski, R. H. (2012). Fate of Naphthalene in Laboratory-Scale Bioretention Cells: Implications for Sustainable Stormwater Management. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(2), 995–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2008a). Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(13), 5247–5253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2008b). Urban particle capture in bioretention media: I. Laboratory and field studies. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 134(6), 409–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre, A., & Pitt, R. (2005). The national stormwater quality database, Version 1.1 A Compilation and analysis of NPDES stormwater monitoring information, U.S. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek, J., Rochfort, Q., Brownlee, B., Mayer, T., & Servos, M. (1999). An exploratory study of urban runoff toxicity. Water Science and Technology, 39(12), 33–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab (2010). Minitab Statistical Software Version 16.1.0.

  • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) (2008). Minnesota stormwater manual. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/stormwater/stormwater-management/minnesotas-stormwater-manual.html.

  • Morgan, J. (2011). Sorption and release of dissolved pollutants via bioretention media. Minneapolis, USA: M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2013). Climate normals for Minneapolis/St. Paul (1981–2010). http://climate.umn.edu/pdf/normals_means_and_extremes/msp_normals_1981-2010.pdf

  • Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 ed., A.L. Page et al. Ed. Agronomy 9:961–1010. American Society of Agronomy, (2nd), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

  • Nestingen, R. S. (2007). The comparison of infiltration devices and modification of the Philip-Dunne permeameter for the assessment of rain gardens. Minneapolis, USA: M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, N. C., Gulliver, J. S., Nieber, J. L., & Kayhanian, M. (2013). Remediation to improve infiltration into compact soils. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 85–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, D. I. and Appelo, C. A. J. (2010). PHREEQC-2 Version 2.17.01.

  • Petersen, E. J., Jennings, A. A., & Ma, J. (2006). Screening level risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in Cleveland area commons. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(3), 392–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prince George's County (PGC) (2007). Bioretention manual. Environmental Service Division. Department of Environmental Resources, Maryland. http://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/Government/AgencyIndex/DER/ESG/Bioretention/pdf/Bioretention%20Manual_2009%20Version.pdf.

  • Sansalone, J. J., & Buchberger, S. G. (1997). Partitioning and first flush of metals in urban roadway storm water. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123(2), 134–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, K. E., & Rawls, W. J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1569–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. L. (2003). Environmental soil chemistry. Academic Press, (2nd), San Diego, USA.

  • Sun, X., & Davis, A. P. (2007). Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere, 66(9), 1601–1609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) provided funding for this project through a 319 grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Additional funding was provided by grants from the Fulbright foundation (KHP and TL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim H. Paus.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 2.74 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paus, K.H., Morgan, J., Gulliver, J.S. et al. Assessment of the Hydraulic and Toxic Metal Removal Capacities of Bioretention Cells After 2 to 8 Years of Service. Water Air Soil Pollut 225, 1803 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1803-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1803-y

Keywords

Navigation