Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 224:1361 | Cite as

Phosphorus Uptake and Release from Submerged Sediments in a Simulated Stream Channel Inundated with a Poultry Litter Source

  • Christopher W. RogersEmail author
  • Andrew N. Sharpley
  • Brian E. Haggard
  • J. Thad Scott
Article

Abstract

Northwest Arkansas, similar to many regions around the world, is home to intensive poultry production, which concentrates large amounts of nutrients in localized areas. Concerns over phosphorus (P) continue in these regions despite extensive conservation management efforts. Part of the concerns relates to the legacy effect of P in streams and the role of fluvial sediments in confounding land conservation measures. Sediment substrate was collected from five streams containing a variety of land uses in the Upper Illinois River Watershed (UIRW) to assess the buffering capacity of sediments on water column P. A purpose built fluvarium was used to determine sediment–P relationships during three flow phases: (I) baseflow (<0.005 mg P L−1), (II) uptake-enriched (1.8 mg P L−1), and (III) re-equilibration (<0.005 mg P L−1) where water was circulated over the sediment for 48 h at 0.001 m3 s−1 (1 L s−1). During each phase, flow was monitored and water sampled for determination of dissolved reactive P (DRP). In phase I, DRP reached equilibrium concentrations, which closely mimicked stream DRP at the time of sediment collection (R 2 = 0.77), and the highest concentration measured was 0.080 mg P L−1 and the lowest 0.016 mg P L−1. Sediments rapidly bound P (40 % within 1 h) during phase II. During phase II, 84 to 96 % of added P was removed from solution. Of this bound P, 1 to 7 % was released during phase III. Results indicate that fluvial sediments in the UIRW act as transient storage sites for P during high P events. Finally, streams that bound the most P during nutrient-rich flow released the least when returned to low P flow, indicating a greater ability to buffer P in streams.

Keywords

Phosphorus Streams Nutrient management Runoff 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was through the Arkansas Water Resource Center and a USGS 104-B grant. Special thanks to Jason Corral, Stephanie Williamson, Bodie Drake, and Tarra Simmons for laboratory and field assistance. Also, thanks to Dr. Richard McDowell for his insights into operation of the fluvarium and Dr. Edward Gbur for assistance in statistical analysis and interpretation.

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  2. Arshad, M. A., Lowery, B., Grossman, B. (1996). Physical tests for monitoring soil quality. In J. W. Doran, & A. J. Jones (Eds.), Methods for assessing soil quality (pp. 123–141). SSSA Spec. Publ. 49. Madison: SSSA.Google Scholar
  3. Brion, G., Brye, K., Haggard, B. E., West, C., & Brahanna, J. (2010). Land-use effects on water quality of a first-order stream in the Ozark Highlands, Mid-Southern United States. River Research and Applications. doi: 10.1002/rra.1394.
  4. Brye, K., & West, C. (2005). Grassland management effects on soil surface properties in the Ozark Highlands. Soil Science, 170, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel, T. C., DeLaune, P. B., Sharpley, A. N., Reiter, M. S., Staed, J. B., Haggard, B. E., Moore, P. A. (2009). Edge of field water quality monitoring from various management practices in the Ozark Highlands. Final Report to Arkansas Natural Resources Commission. 319 U.S. EPA Grant. Little Rock, AR. p 98.Google Scholar
  6. Foy, R. H., & Lennox, S. D. (2006). Evidence for a delayed response of riverine phosphorus exports from increasing agricultural catchment pressures in the Lough Neagh catchment. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 663–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gainswin, B. E., House, W. A., Leadbeater, B. S. C., Armitage, P. D., & Patten, J. (2006). The effects of sediment size fraction and associated algal biofilm on the kinetics of phosphorus desorption. Science of the Total Environment, 360, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haggard, B. E., Stanley, E. H., & Hyler, R. (1999). Sediment–phosphorus relationships in three northcentral Oklahoma streams. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 42, 1709–1714.Google Scholar
  9. Haggard, B. E., Smith, D. R., & Brye, K. R. (2007). Variations in stream water and sediment phosphorus among select Ozark catchments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 1725–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hosomi, M., & Sudo, R. (1986). Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in freshwater samples using persulphate digestion. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 27, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. House, W. A., & Denison, F. H. (2002). Exchange of inorganic phosphate between river waters and bed-sediments. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 4295–4301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert, D., & Maher, W. (1995). An evaluation of the efficiency of the alkaline persulfate digestion for the determination of total phosphorus in turbid waters. Water Research, 1, 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maguire, R. O., Rubaek, G. H., Haggard, B. E., & Foy, B. (2009). Critical evaluation of the implementation of mitigation options for phosphorus from field to catchment scales. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 1989–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCallister, D. L., & Logan, T. J. (1978). Phosphate sorption–desorption characteristics of soils and bottom sediments in the Maumee River Basin of Ohio. Journal of Environmental Quality, 7, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDowell, R. W., & Sharpley, A. N. (2003). Uptake and desorption of phosphorus from overland flow in a stream environment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 937–948.Google Scholar
  16. McDowell, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Folmar, G. (2001). Phosphorus export from an agricultural watershed: linking source and transport mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 1587–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDowell, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Chalmers, A. T. (2002). Land use and flow regime effects on phosphorus chemical dynamics in the fluvial sediment in the Winooski River, VT. Ecological Engineering, 18, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich-3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15, 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers, C. W., Sharpley, A. N., Haggard, B. E., Scott, J. T., Drake, B. M. (2011). Physicochemical characterization of sediment in northwest Arkansas streams. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2. doi: 10.4236/jep.2011.25072.
  20. Self-Davis, M. L., Moore, P. A., & Joern, B. C. (2009). Water- or dilute salt-extractable phosphorus in soil. In J. L. Kovar & G. M. Pierzynski (Eds.), Methods for phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters (pp. 22–24). Blacksburg: Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin, Virginia Tech University.Google Scholar
  21. Sharpley, A. N. (1985). The selective erosion of plant nutrients in runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49, 1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharpley, A. N., Menzel, R. G., Smith, S. J., Rhoades, E. D., & Olness, A. E. (1981). The sorption of soluble P by soil material during transport in runoff from cropped and grassed watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality, 10, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharpley, A. N., Kleinman, P. J. A., Jordan, P., Bergström, L., & Allen, A. L. (2009). Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 1981–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shigaki, F., Kleinman, P. J. A., Schmidt, J. P., Sharpley, A. N., & Allen, A. L. (2008). Impact of dredging on phosphorus transport in agricultural drainage ditches of the Atlantic coastal plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44, 1500–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, D. R., Warnemuende, E. A., Haggard, B. E., & Huang, C. (2006). Dredging of drainage ditches increases short-term transport of soluble phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 611–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, M., & Murdoch, A. (1989). The effect of particle size, chemistry and mineralogy of river sediments on phosphate sorption. Environmental Technology Letters, 10, 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, A. W., & Kunishi, H. M. (1971). Phosphate equilibria on stream sediment and soil in a watershed draining an agricultural region. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 19, 827–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher W. Rogers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew N. Sharpley
    • 1
  • Brian E. Haggard
    • 2
  • J. Thad Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Crop, Soil, and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Arkansas Division of AgricultureFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Biological and Agricultural Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Arkansas Division of AgricultureFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations