Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 223, Issue 9, pp 5903–5915 | Cite as

A Traditional Analysis of the First Flush Effect for Nutrients in Stormwater Runoff from Two Small Urban Catchments

  • J. M. Hathaway
  • R. S. Tucker
  • J. M. Spooner
  • W. F. Hunt
Article

Abstract

Nonpoint stormwater runoff remains a major threat to surface water quality in the USA. More effective stormwater control measures can be designed by understanding patterns in pollutant export with respect to the runoff hydrograph. In particular, nutrient concentrations in urban stormwater can cause deleterious effects in sensitive watersheds in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic USA. A year-long study captured stormwater samples from 36 storm events at two catchments (one primarily impermeable and the other substantially wooded) and analyzed for total suspended solids and various nutrient species. Using these data, the first flush effect (the assumption that the initial portion of a rainfall-runoff event is more polluted than the later portions) was evaluated based on several published methods and definitions. Based on an analysis of multiple methodologies, the ranking of first flush strength among the pollutants was total suspended solids (TSS) > ammonia (NH3) > total Kjeldahl nitrogen > NO2-NO3 > total phosphorus > orthophosphate (O-PO4). Nitrogen species generally displayed a stronger first flush than phosphorus species, with O-PO4 showing the weakest first flush effect. Various relationships ° climate, land use, and the first flush strength were also explored. Of the rainfall characteristics analyzed, total rainfall and runoff volume each inversely affected the first flush strength of TSS on the more impervious catchment. Although orthophosphate did not have a strong first flush effect, the relative first flush strength for O-PO4 increased with increasing rainfall or runoff. Land use did not influence the first flush strength of the pollutants. On average, most pollutants exhibited a slight first flush effect, but substantial pollutant loading still occurred in the latter portion of the storm’s total runoff volume. Thus, treating the majority of a storm’s total pollutant load requires capturing a commensurate fraction of runoff volume.

Keywords

Stormwater Runoff First flush Watershed Catchment TSS Nutrients Nitrogen Phosphorus 

References

  1. Ahlfeld, D. P., & Minihane, M. (2004). Storm flow from first-flush precipitation in stormwater design. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 130(4), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA, AWWA, WPCF. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Am. Public Health Assoc.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, P. M., McCarthy, D. T., & Deletic, A. (2010). Redefining the stormwater first flush phenomenon. Water Research, 44, 2487–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batroney, T., Wadzuk, B. M., & Traver, R. G. (2010). Parking deck’s first flush. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(2), 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., Chebbo, G., & Saget, A. (1998). Distribution of pollutant mass vs volume in stormwater discharges and the first flush phenomenon. Water Research, 32(8), 2341–2356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deletic, A. (1998). First flush load of urban surface runoff. Water Research, 32(8), 2462–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng, Z. Q., de Lima, J. L. M. P., & Singh, V. P. (2005). Fractional kinetic model for first flush of stormwater pollutants. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 131(2), 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flint, K. R., & Davis, A. P. (2007). Pollutant mass flushing characterization of highway stormwater runoff from an ultra-urban area. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 133(6), 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geiger, W. F. (1984). Characteristics of combined sewer runoff. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage (pp. 851-860).Google Scholar
  10. Geiger, W. F. (1987). Flushing effects in combined sewer systems. In Proc. 4th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage (pp. 40-46).Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, K., & Saul, A. J. (1996). Specific relationships for the first flush load in combined sewer flows. Water Research, 30(5), 1244–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hathaway, J. M., & Hunt, W. F. (2011). Evaluation of first flush for indicator bacteria and total suspended solids in urban stormwater runoff. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 217, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hathaway, J. M., Moore, T. L. C., Burkholder, J. M., Hunt, W. F. (2012). Temporal analysis of stormwater SCM effluent based on harmful algal bloom (HAB) sensitivity in surface waters: are annual nutrient EMCs appropriate during HAB-sensitive seasons? Ecological Engineering. (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Helsel, D. R., Kim, J. I., & Randall, C. W. (1979). Land use influences on metals in storm drainage. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 51(4), 709–717.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, J. H., Bang, K. W., Ketchum, L. H., Choe, J. S., & Yu, M. J. (2002). First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. The Science of the Total Environment, 293(1–3), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, J. H., & Bang, K. W. (2000). Characterization of urban stormwater runoff. Water Research, 34(6), 1772–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCarthy, D. T. (2009). A traditional first flush assessment of E. coli in urban stormwater runoff. Water Science and Technology, 60(11), 2749–2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2010). “Soil data mart.” http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/. 15 Dec 2010.
  19. Saget, A., Chebbo, G., & Bertrand-Krajewski, J. (1996). First flush in sewer systems. Water Science and Technology, 33(9), 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sansalone, J. J., & Cristina, C. M. (2004). First flush concepts for suspended and dissolved solids in small impervious watersheds. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 130(11), 1301–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sansalone, J. J., & Buchberger, S. G. (1997). Partitioning and first flush of metals in urban roadway storm water. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 123(2), 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soller, J., Stephenson, J., Olivieri, K., Downing, J., & Olivieri, A. W. (2005). Evaluation of seasonal scale first flush pollutant loading and implications for urban runoff management. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(4), 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stahre, P., & Urbonas, B. (1990). Stormwater detention for drainage, water quality and CSO management. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 37(3), 298.Google Scholar
  24. Taebi, A., & Droste, R. L. (2004). First flush pollution load of urban stormwater runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 3(4), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vorreiter, L. & Hickey, C. (1994). Incidence of the first flush phenomenon in catchments of the Sydney region. In Proceedings of the Water Down Under 1994 Conference. Part 3 (of 3), Nov 21-25 1994, 359-364. Adelaide, Australia: IE Aust, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Wanielista, M. P., & Yousef, Y. A. (1993). Stormwater management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Hathaway
    • 1
  • R. S. Tucker
    • 1
  • J. M. Spooner
    • 1
  • W. F. Hunt
    • 1
  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations