Skip to main content

Ion Exchange Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated by Arsenic in the Presence of Sulphate. Breakthrough Experiments and Modeling

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution volume 223, pages 2373–2386 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

This report deals with the application of ion exchange columns to the treatment of groundwater contaminated by high concentrations of arsenic in the presence of sulphates. Two different process layouts were tested, based on the use of a single column and of two-in-series columns, respectively. Several breakthrough tests were performed, where the effect of the operating parameters, as the influent flow rate, the packed bed height and the feed water composition, were investigated. The collected data were described using three different modeling approaches, based on the Bohart–Adams, Yan and Thomas models, respectively. These models were all found to describe the experimental data with a quite good agreement (based on the R 2 value). The ion exchange capacity evaluated by the models (about 3.8 mEq/g) was comparable with the value provided by the supplier (3.8 mEq/g), but higher than the value determined through batch tests of a previous study by the same authors. The models were then successfully applied to describe the breakthrough behaviour of the two in-series column plant using a real feed contaminated by high arsenic concentrations in the presence of sulphate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Abbreviations

As:

Arsenic

As(V):

Pentavalent arsenic

As(III):

Trivalent arsenic

MAC:

Maximum admissible concentration

IE:

Ion exchange

BKT:

Breakthrough

EX:

Exhaustion

t :

Time (h)

C t :

Effluent concentration (mg/l or μg/l)

C 0 :

Influent concentration (mg/l or μg/l)

V b :

Bed volume (ml)

W b :

Weight of bed resin (mg)

Q :

Influent flow rate (ml/min)

EBCT:

Empty bed contact time (min)

q IE :

Resin uptake capacity (mg)

q IN :

Total amount of arsenic fed to the column at time t (mg)

R%:

Total ion removal (%)

T :

Temperature (°C)

F1 and F2:

Real feed waters

BDST:

Bed depth-service-time

k BA :

Bohart–Adams rate constant (l/h mg)

Z :

Bed depth (m)

N 0 :

Maximum solid phase capacity per unit volume of bed (mg/l)

μ :

Superficial liquid velocity (m/h)

A :

Cross section surface of the resin bed (m2)

q BA :

Maximum solid phase capacity per unit weight of bed estimated by the Bohart–Adams model (mg/g)

k T :

Thomas rate constant (l/h mg)

q T :

Maximum solid phase capacity per unit weight of bed estimated by the Thomas model (mg/g)

V :

Throughput volume (l)

a mdr :

Modified dose–response model constant (unit-less)

t BKT :

BKT time (min)

t EX :

EX time (min)

E R%:

Efficiency of the regeneration phase (%)

SO4(theo):

Expected sulphates in the spent brine solution (mg/l)

SO4(exp):

Measured sulphates in the spent brine solution (mg/l)

References

  • American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation (APHA/AWWA/WEF). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baciocchi, R., & Chiavola, A. (2006). Ion exchange process in the presence of high sulphate concentration: resin regeneration and spent brine reuse. Water Science and Technology-Water Supply, 6(3), 35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baciocchi, R., Chiavola, A., & Gavasci, R. (2005). Ion exchange equilibria of arsenic in the presence of high sulphate and nitrate concentrations. Water Science and Technology-Water Supply, 5(5), 67–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benefield, L. D., Judkins, J. F., Jr., & Weand, B. L. (1982). Process chemistry for water and wastewater treatment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, G. S., & Adams, E. Q. (1920). Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 42, 523–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, C. E., da Silva, E. A., Fagundes-Klen, M. R., Kroumov, A. D., & Guirardello, R. (2008). Prediction of the copper (II) ions dynamic removal from a medium by using mathematical models with analytical solution. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152, 366–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, D. (1999). Ion exchange and inorganic adsorption. In American Water Works Association (Ed.), Water quality and treatment: a handbook of community water supplies (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, D., & Ghurye, G. (2001). Laboratory study on the oxidation of arsenic(III) to arsenic(V). EPA/600/R-01/021.

  • Frankenberger, W. T., Jr. (2001). Environmental chemistry of arsenic. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghurye, G. L., Clifford, D. A., & Tripp, A. R. (1999). Combined arsenic and nitrate removal by ion exchange. Journal of American Water Works Association, 91(10), 85–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helferrich, F. (1962). Ion exchange. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, C. K., & Ali, I. (2000). Arsenic: occurrence, toxicity and speciation techniques. Water Research, 34(17), 4304–4312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., & Benjamin, M. M. (2004). Modeling a novel ion exchange for arsenic and nitrate removal. Water Research, 38, 2053–2062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Benjamin, M. M., Kwan, P., & Chang, J. (2003). A novel ion exchange process for as removal. Journal of American Water Works Association, 95(3), 77–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korngold, E., Belayev, N., & Aronov, L. (2001). Removal of arsenic from drinking water by anion exchangers. Desalination, 141, 81–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ming-Cheng, S. (2005). An overview of arsenic removal by pressure-driven membrane process. Desalination, 172, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U., Jr. (2007). Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents — a critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142, 1–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mudhoo, A., Sharma, S. K., Garg, V. K., & Tseng, C. H. (2011). Arsenic: an overview of applications, health, and environmental concerns and removal processes. Critical Review in Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 435–519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senthilkumar, R., Vijayaraghvan, K., Jegan, J., & Velan, M. (2010). Batch and column removal of total chromium from aqueous solution using Sargassum polycystum. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 29(3), 334–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002). A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. C. (1944). Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 66, 1664–1666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treybal, R. E. (1981). Mass-transfer operations (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2000). Technologies and costs for removal of arsenic from drinking water. EPA 815-R-00-028. Washington.

  • US EPA (2003). Arsenic treatment technology. Evaluation Handbook for Small Systems. EPA 816-R-03-014. Washington.

  • Viraraghavan, T., Subramanian, K. S., & Aruldoss, J. A. (1999). Arsenic in drinking water – problems and solutions. Water Science and Technology, 40(2), 69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, G., Viraraghavan, T., & Chen, M. (2001). A new model for heavy metal removal in a biosorption column. Adsorption Science and Technology, 19, 25–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana,18, 00184, Rome, Italy

    Agostina Chiavola

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, University of Florence, Via S. Marta 3, 50139, Florence, Italy

    Emilio D’Amato

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy

    Renato Baciocchi

Authors
  1. Agostina Chiavola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emilio D’Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renato Baciocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agostina Chiavola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiavola, A., D’Amato, E. & Baciocchi, R. Ion Exchange Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated by Arsenic in the Presence of Sulphate. Breakthrough Experiments and Modeling. Water Air Soil Pollut 223, 2373–2386 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1031-2

Keywords

  • Arsenic
  • Breakthrough
  • Column plant
  • Exhaustion
  • Ion exchange resin
  • Sulphates