Evaluation of First Flush for Indicator Bacteria and Total Suspended Solids in Urban Stormwater Runoff
- 626 Downloads
An urban watershed in Raleigh, NC, was evaluated for Escherichia coli (E. coli), fecal coliform, enterococci, and total suspended solids (TSS) over 20 storm events. Sampling procedures allowed collection of multiple discrete samples per event, resulting in a relatively detailed description of microbe and TSS export for each storm. Data were evaluated to determine if a first flush effect was present for indicator bacteria and TSS in stormwater runoff. Analyses suggested there was a significant first flush effect for fecal coliform and TSS, although the first flush effect for fecal coliform was relatively weak. For E. coli and enterococci, no significant first flush effect was noted. Overall, the first flush effect was not always present for indicator bacteria and, if present, tended to be weak. The first flush effect for TSS was substantially stronger than that of any indicator bacteria. Further analysis showed poor correlation between first flush strength and antecedent climate variables, storm characteristics, and flow characteristics. However, seasonal differences for first flush strength were noted. Specifically, winter storms showed a stronger first flush effect for all indicator bacteria. The results of this study indicate that stormwater runoff presents a potential public health hazard due to elevated indicator bacteria levels for all portions of the storm event. Further, stormwater management practices cannot be expected to treat proportionally more indicator bacteria when sized for the water quality event. Instead, removal will simply be a function of a management practice’s volume capture and microbe sequestration efficiency.
KeywordsIndicator bacteria E. coli enterococci Fecal coliform First flush Stormwater
The authors would like to recognize the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources for funding this project. The authors also thank Dr. Otto Simmons for assistance with bacteria analysis protocols and Shawn Kennedy for his work installing monitoring equipment.
- American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (APHA, AWWA, and WEF). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Alexandria: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Meteorology (ABOM). (2010). Climate statistics for Australian locations: summary statistics for Melbourne regional office. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_086071.shtml (February 16, 2010).
- California Department of Transportation. (2000). First FLUSH STUDY 1999–2000 Report. Rep No. CTSW-RT-00-016, Division of Environmental Analysis, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
- Hathaway, J. M., Hunt, W.F., and Simmons O.D. III. (2010). Statistical evaluation of factors affecting indicator bacteria in urban stormwater runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering (in press).Google Scholar
- Maestre, A., Pitt, R., & Williamson, D. (2004). Nonparametric statistical tests comparing first flush and composite samples from the national stormwater quality database. In W. James (Ed.), Innovative modeling of urban water systems (Vol. 12, pp. 317–338). Guelph: CHI.Google Scholar
- Mankin, K. R., Wang, L., Hutchinson, S. L., & Marchin, G. L. (2007). Escherichia coli sorption to sand and silt load soil. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1159–1165.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, D. T. (2008). Modelling microorganisms in urban stormwater. Doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2009). Vapor pressure calculator. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/epz/?n=wxcalc_vaporpressure (Nov. 18, 2009).
- SAS Institute Inc. 2001. The SAS system for Windows (Release 9.1), Cary, NC.Google Scholar
- Selvakumar, A., & Borst, M. (2006). Variation of microorganism concentrations in urban stormwater runoff with land use and seasons. Journal of Water and Health, 4(1), 109–124.Google Scholar
- State Climate Office of North Carolina (SCONC). (2009). 1971–2000 Climate Normals. http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos/normals.php?station=317079 (Nov. 18, 2009).
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2008). Water quality assessment and total maximum daily loads information (ATTAINS). http://www.epa.gov/waters/ir/index.html (November 29, 2008).
- Wake County and City of Raleigh (WCCOR). (2010). Imaps. http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps/ (February 16, 2010).
- Wanielista, M. P., & Yousef, Y. A. (1993). Stormwater management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar