Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of Integrated Constructed Wetlands Treating Domestic Wastewater

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performances of a new and a mature integrated constructed wetland (ICW) system treating domestic wastewater were evaluated for the first time. The new ICW in Glaslough (near Monaghan, Ireland) comprises five wetland cells, and the mature system in Dunhill (near Waterford, Ireland) comprises four cells. The performance assessment for these systems is based on physical and chemical parameters collected for 1 year in Glaslough and 5 years in Dunhill. The removal efficiencies for the former system were relatively good if compared to the international literature: biochemical oxygen demand (BOD, 99.4%), chemical oxygen demand (COD, 97.0%), suspended solids (SS, 99.5%), ammonia nitrogen (99.0%), nitrate nitrogen (93.5%), and molybdate-reactive phosphorus (MRP, 99.2%). However, the mature ICW had removal efficiencies that decreased over time as the Dunhill village expanded rapidly. The mean removal efficiencies were as follows: BOD (95.2%), COD (89.1%), SS (97.2%), ammonia nitrogen (58.2%), nitrate nitrogen (−11.8%), and MRP (34.0%). The findings indicate that ICW are efficient in removing BOD, COD, SS, and ammonia nitrogen from domestic wastewater. Moreover, both ICW systems did not pollute the receiving surface waters and the groundwater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akratos, C. S., & Tsihrintzis, V. A. (2007). Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 29(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde, A. O., Zhao, Y. Q., O'Neill, M., & O'Sullivan, B. (2008). Constructed wetlands for environmental pollution control: A review of developments, research and practice in Ireland. Environment International, 34(1), 116–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastviken, S. K., Eriksson, P. G., Premrov, A., & Tonderski, K. S. (2005). Potential denitrification in wetland sediments with different plant species detritus. Ecological Engineering, 25(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomo, L., Pastorelli, G., & Zambon, N. (1997). Advantages and limitations of duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems. Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 239–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., Madramootoo, C., Crolla, A., & Kinsley, C. (2003). Pollutant removal from municipal sewage lagoon effluents with a free-surface wetland. Water Research, 37(12), 2803–2812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, A., Scholz, M., Heal, K., Gouriveau, F., & Mustafa, A. (2008). The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for farm constructed wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresource Technology, 99(15), 6780–6792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciria, M. P., Solano, M. L., & Soriano, P. (2005). Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as biomass fuel. Biosystems Engineering, 92(4), 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (1998). Irish phosphorus regulations. Water quality standards for phosphorus. Local Government (Water Pollution) Act 1977. Irish Government, Dublin, Ireland. S.I. No. 258 1998: 1998; http://www.epa.ie/whatwedo/enforce/pa/phosphorus/. Accessed 15 June 2009.

  • Eriksson, P. G., & Weisner, S. E. B. (1996). Functional differences in epiphytic microbial communities in nutrient-rich freshwater ecosystems: An assay of denitrifying capacity. Freshwater Biology, 36(3), 552–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Erb, K. H., Krausmann, F., Adensam, H., & Schulz, N. (2003). Land-use change and socioeconomic metabolism in Austria, part II: Land-use scenarios for 2020. Land Use Policy, 20(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamouri, B., El Nazih, J., & Lahjouj, J. (2007). Subsurface-horizontal flow constructed wetland for sewage treatment under Moroccan climate conditions. Desalination, 215(1–3), 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P. G., & Poach, M. E. (2001). State of the art for animal wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 44(11–12), 19–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. H. (1999). The limits of phosphorus removal in wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 7(3), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. H., & Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. H., Knight, R. L., Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P., & Haberl, R. (2000). Constructed wetlands for pollution control. Scientific and technical report no. 8. London: IWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machate, T., Noll, B. H. H., & Kettrup, A. (1997). Degradation of phenanthrene and hydraulic characteristics in a constructed wetland. Water Research, 31(3), 554–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2007). Wetlands (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. M., Clausen, J. C., & Neafsey, J. A. (1999). Seasonal performance of a wetland constructed to process dairy milk house wastewater in Connecticut. Ecological Engineering, 14(1–2), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. P., Christensen, P. B., Revsbech, N. P., & Sørensen, J. (1990). Denitrification and oxygen respiration in biofilms studied with a microsensor for nitrous oxide and oxygen. Microbial Ecology, 19(1), 63–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, C., Fraser, H. L., & Steer, D. (2005). The interacting effects of temperature and plant community type on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresource Technology, 96(9), 1039–1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Picek, T., Cızkova, H., & Dusek, J. (2007). Greenhouse gas emissions from a constructed wetland—plants as important sources of carbon. Ecological Engineering, 31(3), 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran, N., Agami, M., & Oron, G. (2004). A pilot study of constructed wetlands using duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) for treatment domestic primary effluent in Israel. Water Research, 38(9), 2241–2248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., & D’Angelo, E. M. (1997). Biogeochemical indicators to evaluate pollutant removal efficiency in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakadevan, K., & Bavor, H. (1998). Phosphate adsorption characteristics of soils, slags and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems. Water Research, 32(2), 393–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, M. (2006). Wetland systems to control urban runoff. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, M., Harrington, R., Carroll, P., & Mustafa, A. (2007). The integrated constructed wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands, 27(2), 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano, M. L., Soriano, P., & Ciria, M. P. (2003). Constructed wetlands as a sustainable solution for wastewater treatment in small villages. Biosystems Engineering, 87(1), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, A., Williams, R. J., Cattell, F. C. R., & Krough, M. H. (1994). The function of a coastal wetland as an efficient remover of nutrients from sewage effluent: A case study. Water Science and Technology, 29(4), 295–304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, S. M., Araújo, O. Q. F., & Coelho, M. A. Z. (2008). Model-based optimization of a sequencing batch reactor for biological nitrogen removal. Bioresource Technology, 99(8), 3213–3223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ström, L., & Christensen, T. R. (2007). Below ground carbon turnover and greenhouse gas exchanges in a sub-arctic wetland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39(7), 1689–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C. C., Clayton, J. S., & Upsdell, M. P. (1995). Effect of loading rate and planting on treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in constructed wetlands. II. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research, 29(1), 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. R., Glover, P., & Kalaroopan, T. (1995). An evaluation of pollutant removal from secondary treated sewage effluent using a constructed wetland system. Water Science and Technology, 32(3), 87–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vacca, G., Wand, H., Nikolausz, M., Kuschk, P., & Kastner, M. (2005). Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Research, 39(7), 1361–1373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380(1–2), 48–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. D., & Knight, R. L. (2006). Small-scale constructed wetland treatment systems. London: IWA/Water Environment Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weishampel, P., Kolka, R., & King, J. Y. (2009). Carbon pools and productivity in a 1-km2 heterogeneous forest and peatland mosaic in Minnesota, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 25(2), 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, A. G., Doughtery, J. M., Mchenry, J. L., & Van Loon, V. A. (2002). Treatment variability for wetland wastewater treatment design in cold climates. Ecological Engineering, 19(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Chung, A., Tama, N. F. Y., Pia, N., & Wong, M. H. (2008). Constructed mangrove wetland as secondary treatment system for municipal wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 34(2), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Chang, H., & Huang, M. L. (2001). Nutrient removal in gravel- and soil-based wetland microcosms with and without vegetation. Ecological Engineering, 18(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An International Post-doctoral Research Scholarship from The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey was awarded to Dr Birol Kayranli. Iller Bank (Turkey) is thanked for supporting the lead author financially. Technical support and advice by Ms. Susan Cook (Waterford County Council), Mr. Dan Doodey and Mr. Mark Johnston (both at Monaghan County Council), and Prof. Charlie Fairfield and Dr Prasad Tumula (both at Napier University Edinburgh) are acknowledged. Mr. Oliver Hofmann is thankful for the financial support received by the Edinburgh Research Partnership.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miklas Scholz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A. et al. Performance Evaluation of Integrated Constructed Wetlands Treating Domestic Wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 210, 435–451 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0267-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0267-6

Keywords

Navigation