Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mercury in Biomass Feedstock and Combustion Residuals

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An exploratory survey of the mercury content of some common California biomass feedstocks shows that the concentrations are well below EPA toxicity levels with representative feedstock concentrations of 20 ppb for rice straw, 28 ppb for wheat straw, and 32 ppb for whole-tree wood chips. The temporal variability for rice straw (17–20 ppb) is near the analytical uncertainty (∼2 ppb). Saline-irrigated feedstock does not contain greatly higher mercury contents (17–38 ppb) compared to normally irrigated feedstock. Water leaching has likewise no detectable effects on mercury mobility, despite an up to 30% increase in the Hg concentrations attributable to mass losses during leaching. Combustion at temperatures of at least 575°C results in complete volatilization of mercury leaving solid ash and slag residuals with mercury contents at or near the lower limit of detection (5 ppb). The mercury strongly concentrated in fly ash can reach concentrations up to 40 times (<1,166 ppb) the corresponding fuel concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Arienzo, M. (2005). Processes and factors regulating the behaviour and uptake of trace elements in the rhinosphere. In I. Shtangeeva (Ed.), Trace and ultratrace elements in plants and soil, chapter 3. Southampton: WIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D-6722 (2006). Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and Coal Combustion Residues by Direct Combustion Analysis.

  • Blunk, S. L., Jenkins, B. M., Aldas, R. E., Zhang, R. H., Pan, Z. L., Yu, C. W., et al. (2005). Fuel properties and characteristics of saline biomass. ASABE Annual International Meeting, Tampa Florida, 17–20 July 2005, Paper Number 056132.

  • Brookens, T. J., O’Hara, T. M., Taylor, R. J., Bratton, G. R., & Harvey, J. T. (2008). Total mercury body burden in Pacific harbor seal, Phoca vitulina richardii, pups from central California. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56, 27–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpi, A. (1997). Mercury from combustion sources: A review of the chemical species emitted and their transport in the atmosphere. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 98, 241–254.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conaway, C. H., Mason, R. P., Steding, D. J., & Flegal, A. R. (2005). Estimate of mercury emission from gasoline and diesel fuel consumption, San Francisco Bay area, California. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 101–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coolbaugh, M. F., Gustin, M. S., & Ryuba, J. J. (2002). Annual emissions of mercury to the atmosphere from natural sources in Nevada and California. Environmental Geology, 42, 338–349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebinghaus, R., Slemr, F., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., Hermann, M., et al. (2007). Emissions of gaseous mercury from biomass burning in South America in 2005 observed during CARIBIC flights. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L08813. doi:10.1029/2006GL0288866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA 1997 (US Environmental Protection Agency). Mercury Study. Report to Congress, Volume 1, Executive Summary, December 1997. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • EPA 1998a (US Environmental Protection Agency). Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. Final Report to Congress. EPA-453/R-98-004a,-b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development.

  • EPA 1998b (US Environmental Protection Agency). Method 7343. Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry (January 1998).

  • EPA 2009 (US Environmental Protection Agency). Method 1311, http://www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/epalink?logname=allsearch&referrer=method%201311|1|metaboth&target=http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/1311.pdf, (accessed May 2009).

  • Feng, X., Lu, J. Y., Grègoire, D. C., Hao, Y., Banic, C. M., & Schroeder, W. H. (2004). Analysis of inorganic mercury species associated with airborne particulate matter/aerosols: Method development. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 380, 683–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedli, H. R., Radke, L. F., & Lu, J. Y. (2001). Mercury in smoke from biomass fires. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 3224–3226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedli, H. R., Radke, L. F., Lu, J. Y., Banic, C. M., Leaitch, W. R., & MacPerson, J. I. (2003). Mercury emissions from burning of biomass from temperate North American forests: Laboratory and airborne measurements. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 253–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, K. (1994). 1994 compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards. Geostandards Newsletter, 18, 1–158.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (2006). Method C-07. Determination of total mercury in surface coating materials and applied coatings. Product Safety Laboratory. Book 5, Laboratory Policies and Procedures, Health Canada.

  • Hutson, N. D. (2008). Mercury capture on fly ash and sorbents: The effects of coal properties and combustion conditions. Water Air Soil Pollution Focus, 8, 323–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, B. M., Bakker, R. R., & Wei, J. B. (1996). On the properties of washed straw. Biomass and Bioenergy, 10, 177–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, B. M., Williams, R. B., Bakker, R. R., Yomogida, D. E., Blunk, S. L., Pfaff, D., et al. (1999). Fuel selection and furnace-control in reduction of operating costs for biomass boilers. Volume 3. California Energy Commission, Interagency Agreement 500-94-025, Final Report, Sacramento, California.

  • Jenkins, B. M., Mehlschau, J. J., Williams, R. B., Solomon, C., Balmes, J., Kleinman, M. & Smith, N. (2003). Rice straw smoke generation system for controlled human inhalation exposures. Aerosol Science and Technology, 37, 437–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias, A., & Pendias, H. (1992). Trace elements in soils and plants. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouvo, P. (2002). The fate of mercury during the co-combustion of biomass and wastes in fludized bed combustors. 95th Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association, Baltimore, MD.

  • May, W. E., & Watters, R. L., Jr. (2004). Certificate of analysis NIST SRM 1633b, Coal Fly Ash. http://srmors.nist.gov/certificates.

  • Meij, R., & te Winkel, H. (2007). The emissions of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants from modern coal-fired power stations. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 9262–9272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meister, B. C., Williams, R. B., & Jenkins, B. M. (2005). Utilization of waste renewable fuels in boilers with minimization of pollutant emissions. Laboratory scale gasification screening experiments. PIER Final Report CEC-500-2005-134. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, California.

  • Mentz, K., Pinkerton, J., & Louch, J. (2005). Potential mercury and hydrochloric acid emissions from wood fuels. Forest Products Journal, 55, 46–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2000). Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington: National Research Council, National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, D., Mossmüller, H., Schürmann, R., Antony Chen, L.-W., & Kreidenweis, S. M. (2008). Particulate-phase and gaseous elemental mercury emissions during biomass combustion: Controlling factors and correlation with particulate matter emission. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 721–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. S., Seo, Y.-C., Lee, S. J., & Lee, J. H. (2008). Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources. Powder Technology, 180, 151–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Querol, X., Fernández-Turiel, J. L., & López-Soler, A. (1995). Trace elements in coal and their behaviour during combustion in a large power station. Fuel, 74, 331–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. D., Coale, K. H., Gill, G. A., Andrews, A. H., & Stephenson, M. (2008). Recent increase in atmospheric deposition of mercury to California aquatic sustems inferred from a 300-year geochronological assessment of lake sediments. Applied Geochemistry, 23, 399–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, K. (2008). Fuel-mercury combustion emissions: An important heterogeneous mechanism and an overall review of its implications. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 9014–9030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaeglé, L., & Sunderland, E. M. (2008). Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB2011. doi:10.1029/2007GB003040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotton, D. G., Ayers, S. M., Alpers, C. H., & Goldman, C. R. (2004). Bioaccumulation legacy of gold rush mercury in watersheds of the Sierra Nevada of California. RMZ Materials and Geoenviroment, 51, 1377–1380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thy, P., Lesher, C. E., Jenkins, B. M., & Williams, R. B. (2004). Controlling fouling with rice straw blends in biomass boilers. Sacramento: California Energy Commission, Energy Innovations Small Grant Program. Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thy, P., Jenkins, B. M., Grundvig, S., Shiraki, R., & Lesher, C. E. (2006). High temperature elemental losses and mineralogical changes in common biomass ashes. Fuel, 85, 783–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thy, P., Lesher, C. E., Jenkins, B. M., Gras, M., Shiraki, R., and Tegner, C. (2008). Trace metal mobilization during combustion of biomass fuels. California Energy Commission, PIER Final Report, CEC-500-2008-014.

  • Uriano, G. A. (1982). Certificate of analysis NIST SRM 1645, River Sediment. http://srmors.nist.gov/certificates.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sherry Blunk and Chao Wei Yu kindly gave us access to their samples and unpublished data for saline biomass. This study was in part supported by an instrument grant from the UC Davis-Chevron Joint Research Agreement that is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Thy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thy, P., Jenkins, B.M. Mercury in Biomass Feedstock and Combustion Residuals. Water Air Soil Pollut 209, 429–437 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0211-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0211-9

Keywords