Advertisement

Relationship between Metals Leached and Soil Type from Potential Acid Sulphate Soils under Acidic and Neutral Conditions in Western Australia

  • F. S. MillerEmail author
  • K. L. Kilminster
  • B. Degens
  • G. W. Firns
Article

Abstract

Metal contaminants are likely to be mobilised from soil when in contact with acidic drainage. Soils containing sulphide are often associated with significant quantities of trace metals. Understanding the source of metal pollution is of significant concern for management because sulphide-containing soils are found in close proximity to estuaries, lowland rivers and lakes. This study focuses on Western Australian soils, which are typically sandy and well weathered. Two leachate trials, a batch and a column method, investigated the possibility of characteristic leachate signatures with respect to future traceability of metal contamination from soil drainage. Leaching signatures were assessed for four soil types (grey sand (GS), iron-rich sand (FeRS), silty sand (SS) and peat) found coastally between Perth and Albany, in Western Australia. Trace metals leached from the four soil types showed significant differences for both the metals leached and the concentrations for the column leaching trial. No nickel (<1.0 µgL−1) but relatively high concentrations of arsenic were leached from the peat site. The FeRS leachates contained chromium, copper, high aluminium and relatively high iron. The GS leached extremely high iron and relatively high manganese concentrations. In comparison, only small concentrations of nickel, iron, aluminium, arsenic and manganese leached from the SS columns. Selenium did not leach above reporting limits (<1.0 µg L−1) from any of the soil types. This work suggests that leachate signatures from different soil types exist and that soil type should be considered when determining the risk of aquatic impact associated with acidic drainage.

Keywords

Metal mobility Acid sulphate soils Sulphidic soils Column leaching Acid drainage Trace metals Metalloids 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work described here was one component of a larger project examining risk to water resources associated with the disturbance of ASS, funded from the Australian Federal Government by the National Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. The authors would also like to thank staff from the National Measurement Institute and the Department of Water for their assistance.

References

  1. Ahern, C. R., McElnea, A. E., & Sullivan, L. A. (2004). Acid sulfate soils laboratory methods guidelines. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy.Google Scholar
  2. Appleyard, S., Wong, S., Willis-Jones, B., Angeloni, J., & Watkins, R. (2004). Groundwater acidification caused by urban development in Perth, Western Australia: source, distribution, and implications for management. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 42, 579–585. doi: 10.1071/SR03074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Åström, M. (1998). Mobility of Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and V in sulphide bearing fine grained sediments exposed to atmospheric O2: an experimental study. Environmental Geology, 36, 219–226. doi: 10.1007/s002540050338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Åström, M. (2001). The effect of acid soil leaching on trace element abundance in a medium sized stream, W. Finland. Applied Geochemistry, 16, 387–396. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00034-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blunden, B., & Indraratna, B. (2001). Pyrite oxidation model for assessing ground-water management strategies in acid sulphate soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 146–157. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:2(146).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Degens, B. P., & Wallace-Bell, P. (2008). Acid sulphate soil survey of shallow regolith on the Scott Coastal Plain. In: Hydrogeological record series. Department of Environment - Land and Water Quality Branch.Google Scholar
  7. Deng, H., Åström, M., & Bjorklund, A. (1997). Geochemical and mineralogical properties of sulphide bearing fine grained sediments in Finland. Environmental Geology, 36, 37–44. doi: 10.1007/s002540050318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dent, D. (1986). Acid sulphate soils: a baseline for research and development (vol. 39). International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Dent, D. L., & Pons, L. J. (1995). A world perspective on acid sulphate soils. Geoderma, 67, 263–276. doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(95)00013-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dijkstra, J. J., Meeussen, J. C. L., & Comans, R. N. J. (2004). Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils: an experimental and modelling study. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4390–4395. doi: 10.1021/es049885v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. España, J. S., Pamo, E. L., Santofimia, E., Aduvire, O., Reyes, J., & Barettino, D. (2005). Acid mine drainage in the Iberian pyrite belt (Odiel river watershed, Huelva, SW Spain): geochemistry, mineralogy and environmental implications. Applied Geochemistry, 20, 1320–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ge, Y., Murray, P., & Hendershot, W. H. (2000). Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils. Environmental Pollution, 107, 137–144. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00119-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hage, J. L. T., & Mulder, E. (2003). Preliminary assessment of three new European leaching tests. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 24, 165–172. doi: 10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00129-6.Google Scholar
  14. He, P.-J., Zhang, H., Shao, L.-M., & Lee, D.-J. (2006). Leaching of carbonated air pollution control residues using compliance leaching tests. Environmental Quality, 35, 442–449. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laudon, H., Köhler, S., & Bishop, K. (1999). Natural acidity or anthropogenic acidification in the spring flood of northern Sweden? The Science of the Total Environment, 234, 63–73. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00259-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McDonald, R. C., Isbell, R. F., Speight, J. G., Walker, J., & Hopkins, M. S. (1998). Australian soil and land survey. Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  17. McKenzie, N., Jacquier, D., Isbell, R., & Brown, K. (2004). Australian soils and landscapes: an illustrated compendium. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  18. Meima, J. A., & Comans, R. N. J. (1997). Geochemical modelling of weathering reactions in municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 1269–1276. doi: 10.1021/es9603158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mikkelsen, R. L., & Camberato, J. J. (1995). Potassium, sulfur, lime and micronutrient fertilizers. In: J. E. Rechcigl (Ed.), Soil amendments and environmental quality (pp. 109-138). CRC.Google Scholar
  20. Müller, K., Daus, B., Morgenstern, P., & Wennrich, R. (2007). Mobilization of antimony and arsenic in soil and sediment samples—evaluation of different leaching procedures. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 183, 427–436. doi: 10.1007/s11270-007-9391-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National working party on acid sulfate soils. (2000). National strategy for the management of coastal acid sulfate soils. Wollongbar NSW, Australia: NSW Agriculture.Google Scholar
  22. Oliver, B. G., Thurman, E. M., & Malcolm, R. L. (1983). The contribution of humic substances to the acidity of coloured natural waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica, 47, 2031–2035. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(83)90218-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sammut, J., White, I., & Melville, M. D. (1996). Acidification of an estuarine tributary in Eastern Australia due to drainage of acid sulfate soils. Marine & Freshwater Research, 47, 669–684. doi: 10.1071/MF9960669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sommer, B., & Horwitz, P. (2001). Water quality and macroinvertebrate response to acidification following intensified summer droughts in a Western Australian wetland. Marine & Freshwater Research, 52, 1015–1021. doi: 10.1071/MF00021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Standards Australia (1997). Australian Standards 4439.3-1997. Wastes, sediments and contaminated soils part 3, Preparation of leachates—bottle leaching procedure Google Scholar
  26. Suh, J.-Y., Brown, P. L., & Birch, G. F. (2003). Geochemical factors affecting leachate composition derived from soils in reclaimed lands using laboratory fresh and saline water column experiments. Marine & Freshwater Research, 54, 885–893. doi: 10.1071/MF02118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundström, R., Åström, M., & Österholm, P. (2002). Comparison of the metal content in acid sulfate soil runoff and industrial effluents in Finland. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 4269–4272. doi: 10.1021/es020022g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Western Australian Planning Commission. (2003). Acid Sulphate Soils, Planning Bulletin 64. ISSN 1324-9142.Google Scholar
  29. Xu, H., Allard, B., & Grimvall, A. (1991). Effects of acidification and natural organic materials on the mobility of arsenic in the environment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 57–58, 269–278. doi: 10.1007/BF00282890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. S. Miller
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. L. Kilminster
    • 1
  • B. Degens
    • 1
  • G. W. Firns
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Science Branch, Department of WaterWestern Australian GovernmentPerthAustralia
  2. 2.National Measurement InstituteKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations