Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of Road Runoff by a Combined Storm Water Treatment, Detention and Infiltration System

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Storm water detention devices collect runoff from impermeable catchments. They provide flow attenuation as well as storage capacity, and rely on natural self-purification processes such as sedimentation, filtration and microbial degradation. The aim was to assess the performance of an experimental combined planted gravel filter, storm water detention and infiltration tank system treating runoff from a car park and its access road. Flows were modeled with the US EPA Storm Water Management Model. An overall water balance of the system was compiled, demonstrating that 50% of the rainfall volume escaped the system as evaporation, whereas, of the remaining 50%, approximately two thirds were infiltrated and one third was discharged into the sewer system. These findings illustrated the importance of evaporation in source control, and showed that infiltration can be applied successfully even on man-made urban soils with low permeability. The assessment of the system’s hydrological efficiency indicated mean lag times of 1.84 and 10.6 h for the gravel filter and the entire system, respectively. Mean flow volume reductions of 70% and mean peak flow reductions of 90% were achieved compared to conventional drainage. The assessment of the pollutant removal efficiency resulted in promising removal efficiencies for biochemical oxygen demand (77%), suspended solids (83%), nitrate-nitrogen (32%) and ortho-phosphate-phosphorus (47%). The most important removal processes were identified as biological degradation (predominantly within the gravel ditch), sedimentation and infiltration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Butler, D., & Davies, J. W. (2006). Urban drainage. London: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Parkinson, J. (1997). Towards sustainable urban drainage. Water Science and Technolog, 35, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, S. (2000). Software for the hydraulic design of underground storm water detention tanks. Applied Modeling of Urban Water Systems, 8, 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, P. S., Hildrew, A. G., & Raffaelli, D. J. (1996). Aquatic ecology: Scale, pattern and process. Ecology, 77, 656–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt, B. H., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2004). The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environmental Management, 34, 112–124. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong, S. Y., Chan, W. T., & Lum, L. H. (1991). Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE, 117, 507-524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangani, G., Berloni, A., Bellucci, F., Tatano, F., & Maione, M. (2005). Evaluation of the pollutant content in road runoff first flush waters. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 167, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. (2005). Mapping hazard from urban non-point pollution: A screening model to support sustainable urban drainage planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. J. (1996). Handbuch ausgewählter Klimastationen der Erde (Handbook of selected weather stations worldwide). Soil Erosion Research Group of the University of Trier in Mertesdorf. Trier: University of Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanbakhsh, H., Kazemi-Yazdi, S., & Scholz, M. (2007). Design comparison of experimental storm water detention systems treating concentrated road runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 380, 220–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NSC Council (2002). North Shore City Council, Auckland. Retrieved January 25, 2005, from www.northshorecity.govt.nz.

  • Rossman, L. A. (2005). Storm Water Management Model—User manual Version 5.0. Cincinnati, US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/models/swmm/index.htm.

  • Scholz, M. (2006). Wetland systems to control urban runoff. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNIFFER (2004). SUDS in Scotland - The monitoring programme. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from <http://sudsnet.abertay.ac.uk/documents/sniffersr_02_s1mainreport.pdf>.

  • Temprano, J., Arango, O., Lagiao, J., Suarez, J., & Tejero, I. (2000). Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM: a case study in Northern Spain. Water SA, 32, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verworn, H. R. (2002). Advances in urban drainage management and flood protection. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 1451–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Alderburgh Limited for their sponsorship, Dr Kate Heal for her guidance, and numerous occasional students including Ms. Birgit Fabritius who helped out with technical work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miklas Scholz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scholz, M., Kazemi Yazdi, S. Treatment of Road Runoff by a Combined Storm Water Treatment, Detention and Infiltration System. Water Air Soil Pollut 198, 55–64 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9825-6

Keywords

Navigation