Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying MAR Analysis to Identify Human and Non-Human Fecal Sources in Small Kentucky Watersheds

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recurrence of reports citing water quality impairments in watersheds is evidence that tools are needed to identify pollution sources and facilitate restoration efforts such as implementing total maximum daily limits (TMDLs) or best management practices (BMPs). Fecal bacteria in surface waters are one of the most commonly cited impairments to water quality. This study evaluated microbial source tracking (MST), specifically multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) analysis, as a management tool to differentiate nonpoint source pollution into source groups. A library containing Escherichia coli (E. coli, EC) and fecal streptococci (FS) isolates from poultry (EC n = 282, FS n = 650), human (EC n = 152, FS n = 240), wildlife (EC n = 17, FS n = 43), horse (EC n = 79, FS n = 82), dairy cattle (EC n = 38, FS n = 42), and beef cattle (EC n = 49, FS n = 46) sources was created. The MAR analysis was conducted on the isolates using a profile of seven antibiotics. The antibiotic signatures of unknown source isolates from Elkhorn and Hickman Creek watersheds were evaluated against the library to determine the contributions of potential fecal inputs from the respective sources. Correct classification was >60% when analyzed at the human and non-human-level of classification. On a watershed basis, both watersheds produced similar results; inputs from non-human sources were the greatest contributors to nonpoint source pollution. The results from the multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) analysis revealed that the information produced, coupled with knowledge of the watershed and its associated land uses, would be helpful in allocating resources to remediate impaired water quality in such watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1998). In L. S. Clesceri, et al. (Ed.), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

  • Braga-Neto, U., Hashimoto, R., Dougherty, E. R., Nguyen, D. V., & Carroll, R. J. (2004). Is cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes? Bioinformatics, 20, 253–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. A., Shear, B. L., Ellersieck, M. R., & Asfaw, A. (2001). Identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animal by ribotyping. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 1503–1507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Current Protocols in Immunology Online (2004). Preparing frozen bacterial stocks. New York: Wiley. http://www.mrw2.interscience.wiley.com/cponline/tserver.dll.

  • Dombek, P. E., Johnson, L. K., Zimmerley, S. T., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2000). Use of repetitive DNA sequences and the PCR to differentiate Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 2572–2577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (2001). Geographical structure and host specificity in bacteria and the implications for tracing the source of coliform contamination. Microbiology, 147, 1079–1085.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, A. K., Hagedorn, C., Teetor, A., Mahal, M., Booth, A. M., & Reneau, R. B. (2002). Antibiotic resistance profiles to determine sources of fecal contamination in a rural Virginia watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 1300–1308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, S., Xu, R., Chen, S., Odumeru, J., & Gyles, C. (2002). Development of a procedure for discriminating among Escherichia coli isolates from animal and human sources. Applied Environmental Technology, 68, 2690–2698.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, C., Robinson, S. L., Filtz, J. R., Grubbs, S. M., Angier, T. A., & Reneau, R. B. (1999). Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 5522–5531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartel, P. G., Summer, J. D., Hill, J. L., Collins, J. V., Entry, J. A., & Segars, W. I. (2002). Geographic variability of Escherichia coli ribotypes from animals in Idaho and Georgia. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 1273–1278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, V. J., Whitlock, J., & Withington, V. (2000). Classification of antibiotic resistance patterns of indicator bacteria by discriminant analysis: Use in predicting the source of fecal contamination in subtropical waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 3698–3704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K., Brown, M. B., Carruthers, E. A., Ferguson, J. A., Dombek, P. E., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2004). Sample size, library composition, and genotype diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 4478–4485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, D. R., & Nelson, D. W. (1982). Nitrogen – Inorganic forms. In A. L. Page, et al. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2 (p. 643). Madison, WI: ASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Lapen, D., Scott, A., Dang, A., & Topp, E. (2005). Identifying host sources of fecal pollution: Diversity of Escherichia coli in confined dairy and swine production systems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 5992–5998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, S. L., Daniels, A. D., & Salmore, A. K. (2003). Genetic characterization of Escherichia coli populations from host sources of fecal pollution by using DNA fingerprinting. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 2587–2594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2000). Approved standard M2-A7. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests (7th ed.). Wayne, PA: NCCLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2001). M100-S11 (M2). Disk diffusion eleventh informational supplement. Wayne, PA: NCCLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T. T., Phan, A. P. H., Yam, C. F., & Lenhoff, H. M. (1982). Interference in the determination of ammonia with the hypochlorite-alkaline phenol method of Berthelot. Analytical Chemistry, 54, 46–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, M., Sibakov, M., & Niemela, S. (1983). Antibiotic resistance among different species of fecal coliforms isolated from water samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 45, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T., & Zibilske, L. M. (1991). Determination of low concentrations of phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 892–895.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999). SAS/STAT user’s guide version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute (also available online at http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml/; verified April 04, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. M., Rose, J. B., Jenkins, T. M., Farrah, S. R., & Lukasik, J. (2002). Microbial source tracking: Current methodology and future directions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 5796–5803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. M., Santo Domingo, J. W., & Reasoner, D. J. (2002). Microbial source tracking: State of the science. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 5279–5288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel, D. M., Mathes, M. V., Hyer, K. E., Hagedorn, C., Kator, H., Lukasik, J., et al. (2004). Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 6109–6117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2000). National water quality inventory: 2000 report. Washington, DC: USEPA, Office of Water. http://www.epa.gov/305b/2000report/.

  • Van Veldhoven, P. P., & Mannaerts, G. P. (1987). Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. Analytical Biochemistry, 161, 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherburn, M. W. (1967). Phenol–hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 39, 971–974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, J. E., Jones, D. T., & Harwood, V. J. (2002). Identification of the sources of fecal coliforms in an urban watershed using antibiotic resistance analysis. Water Research, 36, 4273–4282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, B. A., Andrews, R. W., Conway, R. A., Corr, C. L., Dobratz, E. J., Dougherty, D. P., et al. (1999). Use of antibiotic resistance analysis to identify nonpoint sources of fecal pollution. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3483–3486.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation for the statistical assistance of Rhonda Van Dyke, Statistics Department, Jim Crutchfield and Tami Smith for laboratory analyses, and Ann Freytag for technical assistance in the field. Funding for this project was provided, in part, by a grant from the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky – Senate Bill 271. The investigation reported in this paper (07-06-055) is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director. Mention of trade names is for information purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Coyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchey, S.A., Coyne, M.S. Applying MAR Analysis to Identify Human and Non-Human Fecal Sources in Small Kentucky Watersheds. Water Air Soil Pollut 196, 115–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9761-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9761-5

Keywords

Navigation