Source Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at a Backfilled Coal Mine Using Remote Sensing and Biogeochemistry
- 258 Downloads
A biological source treatment (BST) technique using remote sensing and biogeochemistry has been developed to address acid mine drainage (AMD) at its source. The BST technique utilizes down-hole injections of microbial inoculum and substrate amendments to establish a biofilm on the surface of metal sulfides (AMD source material). The treatment results in an elevated groundwater pH (from acidic to circum-neutral levels) and prevents further oxidation of AMD source material. The first 2 years of an ongoing field study of the BST technique at a reclaimed coal mine in central Tennessee (USA) has produced successful results. For instance, the water chemistry in a monitoring well down-gradient from injection wells has improved substantially as follows: the pH increased 1.3 units from 5.7 to 7.3, the dissolved (0.45 µm-filtered) iron concentration decreased by 84% from 93 to 15 mg/l, the conductivity decreased by 379 µS/cm, and sulfate decreased by 78 mg/l. Electromagnetic induction surveys were conducted to identify AMD source material and monitor BST performance by measuring changes in subsurface resistivity throughout the site. These surveys revealed a treatment zone created between injection wells where the resistance of contaminated groundwater from up-gradient AMD sources increased as it flowed past injection wells, thus, suggesting this technique could be used to treat AMD sources directly or to intercept and neutralize sub-surface AMD.
KeywordsAcid mine drainage Biological source treatment Bioremediation Electromagnetic induction survey Pyrite
The authors thank Joel Mason and Roger Gray for conducting field sampling and EM surveys. Financial support was provided by the United States Department of Energy (DoE) and Rio Tinto Energy America through WRI’s Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-98FT40322 with DoE. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the view of the DoE.
- Adams, D. J., Gardner, K. R., Davidson, R. A ., Esplin, D. N., Pickett, T. M., Heyrend, T. T., et al (1995). Biotechnology for pollution prevention in the mining industry, the North West Mining Association Open Industry Briefing, Spokane, WA. Dec 4–8.Google Scholar
- American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
- Characklis, W. G. (1990). Laboratory biofilm reactors. In W. G., Characklis, K. C., & Marshall (Eds.) Biofilms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Christensen, B. E., & Characklis, W. G. (1990). Physical and chemical properties of biofilms. In W. G., Characklis, K. C., & Marshall (Eds.) Biofilms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Jin, S., Fallgren, P. H., Morris, J. M., & Gossard, R. B. (2007). Biological source treatment of acid mine drainage using microbial and substrate amendments: microcosm studies. Mine Water and the Environment, (in press).Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. B., Dziurla, M. A., Kolmert, A., & Hallberg, K. B. (2002). The microbiology of acid mine drainage: Genesis and biotreatment. South African Journal of Science, 98, 249–255.Google Scholar
- Keeney, D. R., & Nelson, D. W. (1982). Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In A. L., Page, R. H., Miller, D. R., & Keeney (Eds.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties-agronomy monograph no. 9(2nd ed.). Madison, WI: ASA.Google Scholar
- Lyew, D., Knowles, R., & Sheppard, J. (1994). The biological treatment of acid mine drainage under continuous flow conditions in a reactor. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 72(B), 42–47.Google Scholar
- Paterson, N. (1995). Application of geophysical methods to the detection and monitoring of acid mine drainage. In Proceedings of SAGEEP 1995, Orlando, FL (pp.181–184). Denver, Colorado, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Tuttle, J. H., Dugan, P. R., & Randles, C. I. (1969). Microbial sulfate reduction and its potential utility as an acid mine water pollution abatement procedure. Applied Microbiology, 17, 297–302.Google Scholar
- Zhang, X. V., Borda, M. J., Schoonen, M. A. A., & Strongin, D. R. (2003). Pyrite oxidation inhibition by a cross-linked lipid coating. Geochemical Transactions, 4, 8–11.Google Scholar