Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Decision-Analytic Approach for Designing Aquaculture Treatment Wetlands Subject to Intermittent Loading under Uncertainty

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intermittent wastewater loading, a characteristic of aquaculture operations, undermines the usefulness of treatment wetlands designed using the steady state assumption. Being biological systems, the treatment variability of such wetlands must also be addressed during the design phase. A simulation-optimization model suitable for modeling intermittent pollutant releases and identifying optimal area and wastewater loading patterns for aquaculture operations is integrated with a decision-analytic framework to determine wetland area and release pattern under uncertainty and risk. Wetland area and release patterns corresponding to different decision making priorities were obtained by applying the minimax, maximax, Hurwicz and minimax regret criteria. The developed methodology provides a convenient framework for aquaculture operators and wetland design engineers to consider trade-off between the wetland size (an indicator of construction and opportunity costs) and wastewater loadings (an indicator of operation costs) during the design process. The results can also be used to characterize the risk-attitudes of the aquaculture operators and identify the worth of additional studies (i.e., pilot tests) given their risk-preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Benjamin, J. R., & Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biao, X., Zhuhong, D., & Xiaorong, W. (2004). Impact of the intensive shrimp farming on the water quality of the adjacent coastal creeks from Eastern China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48, 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, J. (2002). Damkohler number distribution and constituent removal in treatment wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 19, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2001). Making hard decision. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, C. W., Wada, N., Rosegrant, N. W., Meijer, S., & Ahmed, M. (2003). Fish to 2020: Supply and demand in changing global markets. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, B. (2006). A design framework for wetlands to treat aquaculture wastes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University – Kingsville.

  • Edgar, T., Himmelblau, D., & Lasdon, L. (2001). Optimization of chemical processes (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgionne, G. A. (1990). Quantitative management. Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hession, W. C., Storm, D. E., & Haan, C. T. (1996). Two-phase uncertainty analysis: An example using the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 39, 1309–1319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. C., & Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., & Lee, D. Y. (2003). The potential use of constructed wetlands in a re-circulating aquaculture system for shrimp culture. Environmental Pollution, 123, 107–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., Lee, D. Y., Chang, Y. F., Chen, Y. M., & Shih, K. C. (2005). Performance of a constructed wetland treating intensive shrimp aquaculture wastewater under high hydraulic loading rate. Environmental Pollution, 134, 411–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., Lee, D. Y., & Wang, T. W. (2002). Nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using a constructed wetlands system. Aquaculture, 209, 169–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, K., Pai, P., Seigneur, C., & Levin, L. (2000) Sensitivity analysis of mercury human exposure. The Science of the Total Environment, 259, 3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mankin, R. K., & Ikenberry, C. D. (2004). Batch reactor unvegetated wetland performance in treating dairy wastewater. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 1527–1535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paez-Osuna, F. (2001a). The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: A global perspective. Environmental Pollution, 112, 229–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paez-Osuna, F. (2001b). The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: Causes, effects, and mitigating alternatives. Environmental Management, 28, 131–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, T., Todd, S., & Midlen, A. (1997). The treatment of aquaculture wastewaters – A botanical approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 50, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, C. S., Whitlatch, E. E., & Wright, J. R. (1997). Civil and environmental systems engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, D. R., Badrinarayanan, H., Rosati, R., & Son, J. (2002). Constructed wetlands as re-circulation filters in large-scale shrimp aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering, 26, 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1999). Stormwater technology fact sheet: Storm water wetlands. EPA 832-F-99-025. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000). Constructed wetland treatment of municipal wastewaters. EPA/625/R-99/010. Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenendaal, W. J. H., & Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2002). Deterministic versus stochastic sensitivity analysis in investment problems: An environmental case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Straalen, N. M. (2002). Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 11(3–4), 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2001). Natural systems for wastewater treatment, (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. L. (1972). An introduction to Bayesian inference and decision. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRP (1993). Hydraulic structures for wetlands – WRP technical note HS-EM-3-1. United States Army Corps of Engineers.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by NSF under Cooperative Agreement No. HRD-0206259. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatesh Uddameri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uddameri, V., Dyson, B. A Decision-Analytic Approach for Designing Aquaculture Treatment Wetlands Subject to Intermittent Loading under Uncertainty. Water Air Soil Pollut 186, 297–309 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9486-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9486-x

Keywords