Abstract
Intermittent wastewater loading, a characteristic of aquaculture operations, undermines the usefulness of treatment wetlands designed using the steady state assumption. Being biological systems, the treatment variability of such wetlands must also be addressed during the design phase. A simulation-optimization model suitable for modeling intermittent pollutant releases and identifying optimal area and wastewater loading patterns for aquaculture operations is integrated with a decision-analytic framework to determine wetland area and release pattern under uncertainty and risk. Wetland area and release patterns corresponding to different decision making priorities were obtained by applying the minimax, maximax, Hurwicz and minimax regret criteria. The developed methodology provides a convenient framework for aquaculture operators and wetland design engineers to consider trade-off between the wetland size (an indicator of construction and opportunity costs) and wastewater loadings (an indicator of operation costs) during the design process. The results can also be used to characterize the risk-attitudes of the aquaculture operators and identify the worth of additional studies (i.e., pilot tests) given their risk-preferences.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Benjamin, J. R., & Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York: McGraw Hill.
Biao, X., Zhuhong, D., & Xiaorong, W. (2004). Impact of the intensive shrimp farming on the water quality of the adjacent coastal creeks from Eastern China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48, 543–553.
Carleton, J. (2002). Damkohler number distribution and constituent removal in treatment wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 19, 233–248.
Clemens, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2001). Making hard decision. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Delgado, C. W., Wada, N., Rosegrant, N. W., Meijer, S., & Ahmed, M. (2003). Fish to 2020: Supply and demand in changing global markets. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Dyson, B. (2006). A design framework for wetlands to treat aquaculture wastes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University – Kingsville.
Edgar, T., Himmelblau, D., & Lasdon, L. (2001). Optimization of chemical processes (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Forgionne, G. A. (1990). Quantitative management. Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.
Hession, W. C., Storm, D. E., & Haan, C. T. (1996). Two-phase uncertainty analysis: An example using the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 39, 1309–1319.
Kadlec, R. C., & Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., & Lee, D. Y. (2003). The potential use of constructed wetlands in a re-circulating aquaculture system for shrimp culture. Environmental Pollution, 123, 107–113.
Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., Lee, D. Y., Chang, Y. F., Chen, Y. M., & Shih, K. C. (2005). Performance of a constructed wetland treating intensive shrimp aquaculture wastewater under high hydraulic loading rate. Environmental Pollution, 134, 411–421.
Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., Lee, D. Y., & Wang, T. W. (2002). Nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using a constructed wetlands system. Aquaculture, 209, 169–184.
Lohman, K., Pai, P., Seigneur, C., & Levin, L. (2000) Sensitivity analysis of mercury human exposure. The Science of the Total Environment, 259, 3–11.
Mankin, R. K., & Ikenberry, C. D. (2004). Batch reactor unvegetated wetland performance in treating dairy wastewater. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 1527–1535.
Paez-Osuna, F. (2001a). The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: A global perspective. Environmental Pollution, 112, 229–231.
Paez-Osuna, F. (2001b). The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: Causes, effects, and mitigating alternatives. Environmental Management, 28, 131–140.
Redding, T., Todd, S., & Midlen, A. (1997). The treatment of aquaculture wastewaters – A botanical approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 50, 283–299.
Revelle, C. S., Whitlatch, E. E., & Wright, J. R. (1997). Civil and environmental systems engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tilley, D. R., Badrinarayanan, H., Rosati, R., & Son, J. (2002). Constructed wetlands as re-circulation filters in large-scale shrimp aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering, 26, 81–109.
USEPA (1999). Stormwater technology fact sheet: Storm water wetlands. EPA 832-F-99-025. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
USEPA (2000). Constructed wetland treatment of municipal wastewaters. EPA/625/R-99/010. Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
Van Groenendaal, W. J. H., & Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2002). Deterministic versus stochastic sensitivity analysis in investment problems: An environmental case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 8–20.
van Straalen, N. M. (2002). Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 11(3–4), 167–172.
WEF (2001). Natural systems for wastewater treatment, (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.
Winkler, R. L. (1972). An introduction to Bayesian inference and decision. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
WRP (1993). Hydraulic structures for wetlands – WRP technical note HS-EM-3-1. United States Army Corps of Engineers.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by NSF under Cooperative Agreement No. HRD-0206259. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uddameri, V., Dyson, B. A Decision-Analytic Approach for Designing Aquaculture Treatment Wetlands Subject to Intermittent Loading under Uncertainty. Water Air Soil Pollut 186, 297–309 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9486-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9486-x

