Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 171, Issue 1–4, pp 169–184 | Cite as

An Assessment of the Phosphorus Retention Capacity of Wetlands in the Painter Creek Watershed, Minnesota, USA



Lake Minnetonka, located in southeastern Minnesota, U.S.A., is currently experiencing increased eutrophication due to excessive phosphorus (P) loading in runoff from agriculture and urban areas. This phenomenon has been exacerbated by the isolation of wetlands in the surrounding watershed from the surface water drainage network. In order to determine if rerouting surface water through these wetlands would be a feasible method for reducing P inputs, we assessed the P retention capacity of wetlands in a subwatershed of Lake Minnetonka, the Painter Creek Watershed (PCW). The objectives of our study were to determine which of 15 different wetland sites in the PCW had the highest P sorption capacity, identify which soil properties best explained the variability in P sorption, and utilize P fractionation to determine the dominant form of soil P. Our results indicated that despite similar vegetation and hydrogeomorphic settings, wetlands in the PCW had considerably different P sorption capacities. Depth-averaged P sorption index (PSI) values showed considerable variability, ranging from 14.6 to 184. The Katrina Marsh, Painter Marsh, South Highway 26, and West Jennings Bay sites had the highest depth-averaged PSIs. The soil properties that best predicted PSI were soil organic matter, exchangeable calcium, and oxalate extractable iron. Phosphorus fractionation data revealed organic P to be the dominant form of soil P, indicating that organic matter accumulation is another P storage mechanism in these wetlands.


Lake Minnetonka Minnesota phosphorus fractionation phosphorous sorption water quality watershed wetland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axt, J. R. and Walbridge, M. R.: 1999, ‘Phosphate removal capacity of palustrine forested wetlands and adjacent uplands in Virginia’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1019–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R.: 1999, The Nature and Properties of Soil, 12th edn., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, U.S.A, 881 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bridgham, S.D., Johnston, C. A. and Schubaurer-Berigan, J. P.: 2001, ‘P sorption dynamics in soils and coupling with surface and pore water in riverine wetlands’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinson, M. M.: 1993, ‘Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients’, Wetlands 13, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. A., Cole, C. A. and Brooks, R. P.: 2002, ‘A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA’, Wetlands Ecol. Mgmt. 10, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correl, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N. and Smith, V. H.: 1998, ‘Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen’, Ecol. Appl. 8, 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley, G. W.: 1899, ‘Hydrology of the Lake Minnetonka watershed’, Mon. Weather Rev. 27, 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross, A. F. and Schlesinger, W. H.: 2001, ‘Biological and geochemical controls on phosphorus fractions in semiarid soils’, Biogeochemistry 52, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darke, A. K. and Walbridge, M. R.: 2000, ‘Al and Fe biogeochemistry in a floodplain forest: Implications for P retention’, Biogeochemistry 51, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Getsinger, K. D., Petty, D. G., Madsen, J. D., Skogerboe, J. G., Houtman, B. A., Haller, W. T. and Fox, A. M.: 2000, ‘Aquatic dissipation of the herbicide triclopyr in Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota’, Pest Manag. Sci. 56, 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimm, E. C.: 1983, ‘Chronology and dynamics of vegetation change in the prairie-woodland region of southern Minnesota, U.S.A’, New Phytol. 93, 311–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedley, M. J., Stewart, J. W. B. and Chauhan, B. S.: 1982, ‘Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 970–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendershot, W. H., Lalande, H. and Duquette, M.: 1993, ‘Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity’, in M. R. Carter (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp.141–145.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, M. L.: 1958, Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 498 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Johnston, C. A.: 1991, ‘Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: Effects on surface water quality’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Contam. 21, 495–565.Google Scholar
  16. Lockaby, B. G. and Walbridge, M. R.: 1998, ‘Biogeochemistry’, in M. G. Messina and W. H. Conner (eds.), Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar
  17. Lueth, R. A.: 1974, Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  18. Lyons, J. B., Gorres, J. H. and Amador, J. A.: 1998, ‘Spatial and temporal variability of phosphorus retention in a riparian forest soil’, J. Environ. Qual. 27, 895–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murchie, S. L.: 1985, ‘210Pb dating and the recent geologic history of Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota’, Limnol. Ocean. 30, 1154–1170.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, J. and Riley, J.: 1962, ‘A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters’, Analytica Chimica Acta. 27, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Halloran, I. P. O.: 1993, ‘Total and organic phosphorus’, in M.R. Carter (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 213–229.Google Scholar
  22. Qualls, R. G. and Richardson, C. J.: 1995, ‘Forms of soil phosphorus along a nutrient enrichment gradient in the northern Everglades’, Soil Sci. 160, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richardson, C. J.: 1985, ‘Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands’, Science 228, 1424–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson, C. J.: 1999, ‘The role of wetlands in storage, release, and cycling of phosphorus on the landscape: A 25-year retrospective’, in K. R. Reddy (ed), Phosphorus Biogeochemistry in Sub-Tropical Ecosystems, CRC Press/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, C. J. and Vaithiyanathan, P.: 1995, ‘Phosphorus sorption characteristics of Everglades soils along a eutrophication gradient’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59, 1782–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schindler, D. W.: 1977, ‘Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science’, 195, 260–262.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, C. S., Barko, J. W. and McFarland, D. G.: 1991, ‘Ecological considerations in the management of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota’, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, U.S.A. Technical Report A-91–3.Google Scholar
  28. Stein, G. P.: 1971, ‘Lake Minnetonka: Historical perspectives of an urban lake’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  29. Tan, K. H.: 1996, Soil Sampling, Preparation, and Analysis, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, U.S.A., 408 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Tiessen, H. and Moir, J. O.: 1993, ‘Characterization of available P by sequential extraction’, in M. R. Carter (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 75–86Google Scholar
  31. Walbridge, M. R.: 1993, ‘Functions and values of forested wetlands in the Southern United States’, J. Forestry 91, 15–19.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, M. A. and Carpenter, S. R.: 1999, ‘Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States’, Ecol. Appl. 9, 751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright, H. E. Jr.: 1972, ‘Quaternary history of Minnesota’, in B. Kummel and D. M. Raup (eds.), Geology of Minnesota: A Centennial Volume, Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A., pp. 494–520.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, R. B., Lockaby, B. G. and Walbridge, M. R.: 2001, ‘Phosphorus availability in an artificially flooded southeastern floodplain forest soil’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1293–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke University Wetland CenterNicholas School of the Environment and Earth SciencesDurhamU.S.A.
  2. 2.Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Soil and Water Science DepartmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations