Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency and Flow Regime of a Highway Stormwater Detention Pond in Washington, USA

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wet detention ponds are a preferable alternative in treating stormwater runoff. Literature suggests that a detention pond’s efficiency in removing principal pollutants of concern, TSS and metals, is highly variable and is affected by a complex array of factors including its geographic location. The objective of this paper was to investigate the TSS and metal removal efficiency of a highway stormwater detention pond in Spokane, Washington along with its flow regime. Pond influent and effluent data for TSS and metal were collected for approximately two years. TSS removal by the pond was found to be 68.1–99.4% with an average of 83.9%. Average metal removal efficiency was 54.7–64.6% which is 72.5–86.9% of the TSS removal. The pond’s flow regime was found to vary with its changing surface topography, a result of sedimentation of suspended solids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barret, M. E., Irish, L. B., Malina, J. F. and Charbeneau, R. J.: 1998, ‘Chracterization of highway runoff in Austin Texas’, J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE 124, 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthouex, P. M. and Brown, L. C.: 1994, Statistics for Environmental Engineers, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, K. J., Booth, D. B. and Horner, R. R.: 2000, ‘Storm water pollutant removal by two wet ponds in Bellevue, Washington’, J. Envir. Engrg. 126, 321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, A. G.: 1998, Analysis of Mixing in Wet Ponds Through Physical Modeling, M.S. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.

  • Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S. and Greenberg, A. E. (eds.): 1995, ‘Standard Methods. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater’, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, R., Borst, M., O’Conner, T., Stinson, M., Fan, C. Y., Perdek, J. M. and Sullivan, D.: 1998, ‘Urban wet weather flow management: Research directions’, J. Water Res. Planning and Management 124, 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, D. W. and Sansalone, J. J.: 2002, ‘Accretion and partitioning of heavy metals associated with snow exposed to urban traffic and winter storm maintenance activities’, J. Envir. Engrg. 128, 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greb, S. R. and Bannerman, R. T.: 1997, ‘Influence of particle size on wet pond effectiveness’, Water Envir. Res. 69, 1134–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. K., Agnew, R. W. and Kobriger, N. P.: 1981, ‘Constituents of highway runoff: State-of-the-art-report’, Vol. 1, Report No. FHWA/RD-81/042. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  • Hares, R. J. and Ward, N. I.: 1999, ‘Comparison of the heavy metal content of motorway stormwater following discharge into wet biofiltration and dry detention ponds along the London Orbital (M25) motorway’, Sci. Total Envir. 235, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobriger, N. and Geinopolos, A.: 1984, ‘Sources and migration of highway runoff pollutants: Research report’, Report No. FHWA/RD-84/059. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 3.

  • Mallin, M. A., Ensign, S. H., Wheeler, T. L. and Mayes, D. B.: 2002, ‘Pollutant removal efficacy of three wet detention ponds’, J. Envir. Qual. 31, 654–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, T. J. R.: 1997, ‘FEM-Modelling of open stormwater detention ponds’, Nordic Hydrol. 28, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, T. J. R.: 1998, ‘Water quality improvement in a small stormwater detention pond’, Water Sci Technol. 38, 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, M. and Argaman, Y.: 1965, ‘Evaluation of hydraulic efficiency of sedimentation basins’, J. Sanitary Engrg. Div., ASCE SA 5, 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, D. W.: 1996, ‘Pollutant removal by a stormwater dry detention pond’, Water Envir. Res. 68, 1076–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiyamani, C., Shanholtz, V. O., Younos, T. M. and Thomson, S. J.: 1994, ‘A modeling approach for optimum sediment detention pond design’, Water Resour. Bul. 30, 335–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA: 1994, ‘Method 200.8 – Determination of metals and trace elements in water and wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry’, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. J.: 1998, ‘Modelling residence time in stormwater ponds’, Ecol. Eng. 10, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. S., Allan, C. J., Saunders, W. L. and Evett, J. B.: 1998, ‘Characterization and pollutant loading estimation for highway runoff’, J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE 124, 584–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. S., Holman, R. E. and Dorney, J. R.: 1996, ‘Systematic evaluation of pollutant removal by urban wet detention ponds’, J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 122, 983–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonge, D. R., Hossain, A., Barber, M., Chen, S and Griffin, D.: 2002, ‘Wet detention pond design for highway runoff pollutant control: Final report’, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, M.A., Alam, M., Yonge, D.R. et al. Efficiency and Flow Regime of a Highway Stormwater Detention Pond in Washington, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 164, 79–89 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-2250-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-2250-1

Keywords

Navigation