Skip to main content
Log in

An Empirical Model for Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model for estimating the remediation costs at contaminated sites is developed, in which the predictor variable is a composite of surface, subsurface, and contaminant risk factors. Calibration of the model is performed at 83 sites in an urbanized watershed with diverse surface geology in southeastern Michigan. These test sites exhibited different extents of contamination, including some where only soil was contaminated, and others where soil and groundwater were contaminated. The model was then applied to 79 sites with multiple contamination extents within different watersheds in North America, Europe, Australia, and Africa. The results indicate a very high correlation between the estimated and actual remediation costs at these sites. This model thus has the potential for providing reliable estimates of remediation costs across a broad array of soil and groundwater contamination scenarios, including dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) contamination in sandy soil and lead in clay soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J. and Hackett, G.: 1987, DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, Ada, Oklahoma: U.S. EPA-600/2–87–035.

  • Aziz, J. J., Ling, M., Rifai, H. S., Newell, C. J. and Gonzales, J. R.: 2003, ‘MAROS: A decision support system for optimizing monitoring plans’, Ground Water 41, 355–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, T. H., Dunn, D., Battaglin, W. A. and Vowinkel, E. F.: 1990, ‘Problems and methods involved in relating land use to groundwater quality’, Water Resour. Bull. 26, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, C., Andress, C., Setzman, J. and Cooney, D.: 1991, New Life for Old Buildings: Confronting Environmental and Economic Barriers to Industrial Reuse, Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC.

  • Bedient, P. B., Hanadi, S. R. and Newell, C. J.: 1999, Ground Water Contamination: Transport and Remediation, 2nd edn., Prentice Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, S. G. and MacLachlan, D. C.: 1951, Guidebook to the Study of Pleistocene Features of the Huron-Saginaw Ice Lobes in Michigan, The Glacial Field Trip of the Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, J. A. and Eschman, D.: 1988, Geology of Michigan. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 476 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, D. A. V. and Stackelberg, P. E.: 1995, ‘Relation of groundwater quality to land use on long island, New York’, Ground Water 33, 1019–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, W. R.: 1982, Quaternary Geology of Southern (& Northern) Michigan, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Division, Lansing, MI, 1:500,000.

  • Farrand, W. R.: 1988, The Glacial Lakes Around Michigan, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Bulletin No. 4, Lansing, MI.

  • Finley, E. T.: 1993, ‘Evaluating the adequacy of MCLs as a health-protective cleanup goal: An analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques’, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 18(3), 438–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A. E.: 2004, ‘Validation of numerical ground water models used to guide decision making’, Ground Water 42, 277–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. H., Boethling, R. S., Jarvis, W. F., Meylan, W. M. and Michalenko, E. M.: 1991, Environmental Degradation Rates, Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, 725 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, S.: 2001, ‘A Brownfield Restoration Primer’, Environ. Protection 12, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. M.: 1997, ‘Spatial assessment of risk to groundwater from surface activities’, Pap. Proc. Appl. Geogr. Conf. 20, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. M.: 2000, ‘Automated procedure for groundwater risk assessment from surface sources’, Pap. Proc. Appl. Geogr. Conf. 23, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. M., Murray, K. S. and Rogers, D. T.: 2003, ‘Surface and subsurface geologic risk factors to ground water affecting brownfield redevelopment potential’, Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 490–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leverett, F. B.: 1911, Map of the Surface Formations of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan, Geological survey of Michigan, Publication 25, Lansing, MI, 1:1,000,000.

  • MDEQ, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality: 1995, Operational Memorandum Number 8, Lansing, Michigan, p. 108.

  • MDEQ, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality: 2002, Michigan Sites of Environmental Contamination. http://www.deq.state.mi.us/tri/02facility.asp, accessed 12/20/04.

  • Mozola, A. J.: 1969, Geology for Land and Groundwater Development in Wayne County, Michigan. Report of Investigation 3, State of Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Geol. Survey, Lansing, MI.

  • Murray, K. S. and Rogers, D. T.: 1999, ‘Groundwater vulnerability, brownfield redevelopment and land use planning’, Journal of Environ. Plann. Manage. 42, 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment): 1995, State of the States on Brownfields: Programs for Cleanup and Reuse of Contaminated Sites. Congress of the United States, Washington, DC.

  • Rieck, R. L.: 1981, Glacial drift thickness, Southern Peninsula. Plate 15. Hydrogeologic Atlas of Michigan. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

  • Rieck, R. L.: 1981a, Community public water supplies. Plate 22. Hydrogeologic Atlas of Michigan.Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

  • Rogers, D. T.: 1996, Environmental Geology of Metropolitan Detroit. Clayton Environmental Consultants, Novi, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. T. and Murray, K. S.: 1997, ‘Occurrence of groundwater in metropolitan Detroit, USA’, in Groundwater in the Environment, Vol. 1, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 155–160.

  • Rogers, D. T., Murray, K. S. and Kaufman, M. M.: 2005, ‘Assessment of groundwater contaminant vulnerability in an urban watershed in Southeast Michigan USA’, in K. Howard (ed), Matthias Eiswirth Memorial Volume, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in press.

  • Secunda, S., Collin, M. L., Melloul, M. L. and Abraham, J.: 1998, ‘Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Sharon region’, Journal of Environmental Management 54, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherzer, W. H.: 1916, Geologic Atlas of the United States, Detroit Folio No. 205, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA 1:62,500.

  • Simons, R.: 1999, ‘How many brownfields are there? An economic base contraction analysis of 31 U.S. cities’, Public Works Management and Policy 2, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.: 2000, ‘New ways to pay for property restoration’, Public Manage. 83, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, M. P. and Rifai, H. S.: 1999, ‘Biodegradation rates for fuel hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents in groundwater’, Bioremediat. J. 3, 337–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W.: 1988, ‘Resolution, resampling and all that’, in H. Mounsey and R. Tomlinson (eds), Building Database for Global Science, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Office of Management and Budget: 1987, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency): 1983, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-486), Washington, DC.

  • US EPA: 1989, Transport and Fate of Contaminants in the Subsurface, EPA/625/4–89/019, Washington, DC, 148 pp.

  • US EPA: 1996, Bioscreen. Natural Attenuation Decision Support System, Version 1.4, Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC, 65 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA: 1996a, Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC, 230 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA: 1997, Expediting Cleanup and Redevelopment of Brownfields: Addressing the Major Barriers to Private Sector Involvement – Real or Perceived, Washington, DC.

  • US EPA: 2000, Biochlor, Natural Attenuation Decision Support System, Version 1.0, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, 45 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, T. M. and McCarty, P. L.: 1985, ‘Biotransformation of tetrachloroethylene to trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, vinyl chloride, and carbon dioxide under methanogenic conditions’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 1080–1083.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. A. and McTernan, W. F.: 2002, ‘The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty’, Journal of Environ. Management 64, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemeier, T. H., Rifai, H. S., Newell, C. J. and Wilson, J. T.: 1999, Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 617 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woll, B., Mack, J., Ellerbusch, F. and Vetter, J. R.: 2003, ‘Facilitating brownfields transactions using triad and environmental insurance’, Remediation 13, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin M. Kaufman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, M.M., Rogers, D.T. & Murray, K.S. An Empirical Model for Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites. Water Air Soil Pollut 167, 365–386 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-0214-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-0214-0

Keywords

Navigation