Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing Water Cycle Restoration through LID Practices Considering Climate Change: A Study on Permeable Pavement Planning by an Iterative MCDM Model

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal low impact development (LID) design for restoring the water cycle within watersheds considering climate change is crucial for adaptation to future climate change. In this study, a practical and effective allocation method for permeable pavement was proposed to restore the water cycle within watersheds considering future climate change. A total of 15 general circulation models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 6 were used to simulate future climate variables according to two shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios. The stormwater management model (SWMM) was employed for long-term hydrological simulation. The installation priority of permeable pavement in sub-watersheds was robustly determined using coupled fuzzy TOPSIS and VIKOR methods. The results of this study confirmed that the different climate predictions of each GCM could affect the prioritization results. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the allocation method adopted in this study improved water cycle restoration more effectively than when allocating the available capacity at once according to priority. The results of this study could help accurately determine the LID capacity of each sub-watershed under limited resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data can be supported if requested.

References

  • Ahmad MJ, Choi KS (2023) Spatial-temporal evolution and projection of climate extremes in South Korea based on multi-GCM ensemble data. Atmos Res 289:106772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadalipour A, Rana A, Moradkhani H, Sharma A (2017) Multi-criteria evaluation of CMIP5 GCMs for climate change impact analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 128:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alehu BA, Bitana SG (2023) Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Water Balance of Lake Hawassa Catchment. Environ Process 10:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorocho-Daza H, Cabrales S, Santos R, Saldarriaga J (2019) A new Multi-criteria decision analysis methodology for the selection of New Water Supply infrastructure. Water 11(4):805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asif Z, Chen Z, Sadiq R, Zhu Y (2023) Climate Change impacts on Water resources and Sustainable Water Management Strategies in North America. Water Resour Manag 37:2771–2786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chae ST, Chung ES, Jiang J (2022) Robust siting of permeable pavement in highly urbanized watersheds considering Climate Change using a combination of Fuzzy-TOPSIS and the VIKOR Method. Water Resour Manag 36:951–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multi criteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manage 90(3):1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Hong WP, Lee KS, Burian SJ (2011) Integrated use of a continuous simulation model and multi-attribute decision making for ranking urban watershed management alternatives. Water Resour Manag 25(2):641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook BI, Mankin JS, Marvel K, Williams AP, Smerdon JE, Anchukaitis KJ (2020) Twenty-First Century Drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Earths Future 8(6):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou P, Zuo S, Ren Y, Rodriquez MJ, Dai S (2021) Refined water security assessment for sustainable water management: a case study of 15 key cities in the Yangtze River Delta, China. J Environ Manage 290:112588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehteram M, Mousavi SF, Karami H, Farzin S, Singh VP, Chau KW, El-Shafie A (2018) Reservoir operation based on evolutionary algorithms and multi-criteria decision-making under climate change and uncertainty. J Hydroinformatics 20(2):332–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebre SL, Cattrysse D, Orshoven JV (2021) Multi-criteria decision-making methods to address water allocation problems: a systematic review. Water 13(2):125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazbavi Z, Sadeghi SH, Gholamalifard M, Davudirad AA (2019) Watershed health assessment using the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework. Land Degrad Dev 31(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi Y, Tanoue M, Sasaki O, Zhou X, Yamazaki D (2021) Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections. Sci Rep 11:3740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Zhu M, Wang Y, Sun S (2020) Optimal spatial priority scheme of urban LID-BMPs under different investment periods. Landsc Urban Plann 202:103858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huong NT, Kim YT, Kwon HH (2023) Evaluation and selection of CMIP6 GCMs for long-term hydrological projections based on spatial performance assessment metrics across South Korea. J Water Clim Chang 14(8):2663–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making an introduction, Sage publications. Thousand Oaks Lond New Delhi 104:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaykhosravi S, Khan UT, Jadidi MA (2022) A simplified geospatial model to rank LID solutions for urban runoff management. Sci Total Environ 831:154937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Chung ES, Jun SM (2015) Iterative Framework for Robust reclaimed Wastewater Allocation in a changing Environment using Multi-criteria decision making. Water Resour Manag 29:295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Sung JH, Shahid S, Chung ES (2022) Future Hydrological Drought Analysis considering Agricultural Water Withdrawal under SSP scenarios. Water Resour Manag 36:2913–2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Wang F, Yu Y, Huang Z, Li M, Guan Y (2019) Comprehensive performance evaluation of LID practices for the sponge city construction: a case study in Guangxi, China. J Environ Manage 231:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizia P, Voukkali I, Zorpas AA, Pedreno JN, Chatziparaskeva G, Inglezakis VJ, Vardopoulos I, Doula M (2021) Measuring the level of environmental performance in insular areas, through key performed indicators, in the framework of waste strategy development. Sci Total Environ 753:141974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei AR, Ismail Z, Niksokhan MH, Dayarian MA, Ramli AH, Shirazi SM (2019) A quantity-quality model to assess the effects of source control stormwater management on hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale. Water 11(7):1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei AR, Ismail Z, Niksokhan MH, Dayarian MA, Ramli AH, Yusoff S (2021) Optimal implementation of low impact development for urban stormwater quantity and quality control using multi-objective optimization. Environ Monit Assess 193:241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samouei S, Ozger M (2020) Evaluating the performance of low impact development practices in urban runoff mitigation through distributed and combined implementation. J Hydroinformatics 22(6):1506–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Song YH, Shahid S, Chung ES (2021) Differences in multi-model ensembles of CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections for future droughts in South Korea. Int J Climatol, 1–29

  • Song YH, Chung ES, Shahid S (2022) Uncertainties in evapotranspiration projections associated with estimation methods and CMIP6 GCMs for South Korea. Sci Total Environ 825:153953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Wang Y, Liu J, Cai H, Wu P, Geng Q, Xu L (2016) Sustainability assessment of regional water resources under the DPSIR framework. J Hydrol 532:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami D, Parthasarathy D (2021) Dynamics of exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity and agricultural vulnerability at district scale for Maharashtra, India. Ecol Indic 121:107206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Jiang J, Shamseldin AY, Shi H, Wang X, Shang F, Wang S, Zheng Y (2022) Comprehensive optimization framework for low impact development facility layout design with cost–benefit analysis: a case study in Shenzhen city, China. ACS ES&T Water 2:63–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Zhang D, Adhityan A, Ng WJ, Dong J, Tan SK (2016) Assessing cost-effectiveness of bioretention on stormwater in response to climate change and urbanization for future scenarios. J Hydrol 543:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Zhang J, Krebs P (2022) Low impact development practices mitigate urban flooding and non-point pollution under climate change. J Clean Prod 347:131320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao L, Wu Z, Wang Y, Sun S, Wei W, Xu Y (2020) Does the spatial location of green roofs affects runoff mitigation in small urbanized catchments? J Environ Manage 268:110707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Xie J, Jiang R, Zuo G, Liang J (2020) Assessment of water resource carrying capacity based on the chicken swarm optimization-projection pursuit model. Arab J Geosci 13:39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani R, Ali AMA, Roozbahani A (2020) Evaluation of adaptation scenarios for climate change impacts on agricultural water allocation using fuzzy MCDM methods. Water Resour Manag 34:1093–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Xiao Y, Liang D, Tang H, Xu J, Yuan S, Luan B (2020) A physically-based model for dissolved pollutant transport over impervious surfaces. J Hydrol 590:125478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Li H, Yang B, Zhang X, Mahmud S, Zhang X, Yu B, Zhu Y (2021) Permeable pavement design framework for urban stormwater management considering multiple criteria and uncertainty. J Clean Prod 293:126114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research supported by Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement Grant (22CTAP-C163963-02) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. This study was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2021R1A2C2005699).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01811, Korea

    Seung Taek Chae & Eun-Sung Chung

  2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Jiping Jiang

Authors
  1. Seung Taek Chae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eun-Sung Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiping Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Eun-Sung Chung; Formal analysis, Seung Taek Chae, and Eun-Sung Chung; Methodology, Eun-Sung Chung, and Jiping Jiang, Writing – original draft, Seung Taek Chae and Eun-Sung Chung; Writing – review & editing, Eun-Sung Chung, and Jiping Jiang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Sung Chung.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

The authors declare that they have consent to participate in this paper.

Consent to Publish

The authors declare that they have consent to publish in this journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing interests that authors must disclose all affiliations, funding sources, financial or personal relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chae, S.T., Chung, ES. & Jiang, J. Enhancing Water Cycle Restoration through LID Practices Considering Climate Change: A Study on Permeable Pavement Planning by an Iterative MCDM Model. Water Resour Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03821-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03821-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation