Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of Confluence Flow in a Degraded Bed under Different Hydraulic Parameters, Using SSIIM 2.0

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

River interaction is a problematic place in hydraulic engineering. This is rooted in creating an intricate behavior that leads to the development of vortex flow at the intersections and results in sediment deposition in these areas. This phenomenon depends on various factors, from flow rate ratio, intersection angle, channel geometry, longitudinal slope to bed resistance, and lateral channel width ratio to the main channel. Studying flow patterns is a necessary action that can assist in predicting the changes in bed morphology and preventing issues, such as main channel blockage while increasing the flow rate in the main channel. The SSIIM2.0 model's capacity to simulate three-dimensional flow at a confluence was used to examine the effects of bed morphology and flow parameters on junction angle, flow rate ratio, and lateral channel width ratio. With correlation values of 0.9 and 0.68 for velocity and bed profiles, the results show that this model can reasonably predict these variables. Additionally, the effect of various junction angles (45, 60, 75, 90, and 105 degrees) on hydraulic flow, particularly maximum bed shear stress, temporal variation of shear stress, and dimensions of the separation area, were examined. At the 45° angle, a significant separation area was not observed, but the results showed that with an increase in the junction angle, the dimensions of the separation area are increased. Dimensionless length of the separation zone has decreased by 18% due to a change in the connection angle from 60° to 105°. Meanwhile, the width of the separation zone has increased by 60%. Furthermore, the results indicate that increasing the tributary angle from 45° to 105° resulted in a 91.8% increase in maximum bed shear stress at the junction location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data and materials are available.

References

  • Afaridegan E, Amanian N, Haghiabi A, Parsaie A, Goodarzi-Mohammadi A (2023) Numerical investigation of modified semi-cylindrical weirs. Water Resour Manag 37(9):3715–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balouchi B, Shafai-Bejestan M, Ruther N, Rahmanshahi M (2022) Experimental investigation of flow pattern over a fully developed bed at a 60° river confluence in large floods. Acta Geophys 70(5):2283–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best JL (1987) Flow dynamics at river channel confluences: Implications for sediment transport and bed morphology. AAPG. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.87.39.0027

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biron PM, Richer A, Kirkbride AD, Roy AG, Han S (2002) Spatial patterns of water surface topography at a river confluence. Earth Surf Process Landf 27(9):913–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan RB, Kuhn NJ (2002) Hydraulic conditions in experimental rill confluences and scour in erodible soils. Water Resour Res 38(5):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawen L, Qingyang L, Yong Z (2023) Characterization and classification of river network types. Water Resour Manag 37(15):6219–6236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosronejad A, Rennie CD, Salehi Neyshabouri SAA, Townsend RD (2007) 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in laboratory channel bends. J Hydraul Eng 133(10):1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen NRB (2006) A three-dimensional numerical model for simulation of sediment movements in water intakes with multiblock option. User’s manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna N, De Marchis M, Canelas OB, Napoli E, Cardoso AH, Gaudio R (2018) Effect of the junction angle on turbulent flow at a hydraulic confluence. Water 10(4):469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbala A, Shafai Bejestan M, Sajjadi SM, Fraccarollo L (2023) Investigation of the different models of elliptical-lopac gate performance under submerged flow conditions. Water Resour Manag 37(9):3527–3542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheed R, Yan X, Mohammadian A (2021) Review and comparison of numerical simulations of secondary flow in river confluences. Water 13(14):1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen X, Li R, Cai H, Feng J, Wan H (2022) Characteristics of secondary flow and separation zone with different junction angle and flow ratio at river confluences. J Hydrol 614:128537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin J, Lee S, Park I (2023) Influences of momentum ratio on transverse dispersion for intermediate-field mixing downstream of channel confluence. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(4):2776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn LC (1987) Mathematical modelling of morphological processes in the case of suspended sediment transport. Waterloopkundig Laboratorium, Delft, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber LJ, Schumate ED, Mawer N (2001) Experiments on flow at a 90 open-channel junction. J Hydraul Eng 127(5):340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Rodi W, Wenka T (2000) 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in open channels. J Hydraul Eng 126(1):4–15

  • Yu Q, Yuan S, Rennie CD (2020) Experiments on the morphodynamics of open channel confluences: Implications for the accumulation of contaminated sediments. J Geophys Res Earth 125(9):e2019JF005438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Tang H, Xiao Y, Qiu X, Xia Y (2018) Water flow and sediment transport at open-channel confluences: An experimental study. J Hydraul Res 56(3):333–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Yan G, Tang H, Xiao Y, Rahimi H, Aye MN, Gualtieri C (2023) Effects of tributary floodplain on confluence hydrodynamics. J Hydraul Res 61(4):552–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research has not been supported through any funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the idea and design of the study. Milad Pourvahedi wrote the original text draft, and the other authors provided feedback. The final manuscript was reviewed and approved by all writers.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milad Pourvahedi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

The authors have seen and approved the final manuscript and contributed significantly.

Consent to Publish

The authors have agreed to publish the study in Water Resources Management Journal.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pourvahedi, M., Hosseini, K., Mousavi, SF. et al. Numerical Investigation of Confluence Flow in a Degraded Bed under Different Hydraulic Parameters, Using SSIIM 2.0. Water Resour Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03818-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03818-8

Keywords

Navigation