Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Classical and Machine Learning Methods in Estimation of Missing Streamflow Data

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovering missing data and access to a complete and accurate streamflow data is of great importance in water resources management. This article aims to comparatively investigate the application of different classical and machine learning-based methods in recovering missing streamflow data in three mountainous basins in northern Iran using 26 years of data duration extending from 1991 to 2017. These include Taleghan, Karaj, and Latyan basins that provide municipal water for the capital Tehran. Two periods of artificial gaps of data were considered to avoid possible duration-based impacts that may affect the results. For this purpose, several methods are investigated including simple and multiple linear regressions (LR & MLR), artificial neural network (ANN) with five different structures, support vector regression (SVR), M5 tree and two Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) comprising Subtractive (Sub-ANFIS) and fuzzy C-means (FCM-ANFIS) classification. Although these methods have been used in different problems in the past, but the comparison of all these methods and the application of ANFIS using two clustering methods in missing data is new. Overall, it was noticed that machine learning-based methods yield better outputs. For instance, in the Taleghan basin and in the gap during 2014–2017 period it shows that the evaluation criteria of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Index (NSE) and Coefficient of Determination \({({\text{R}}}^{2})\) for the Sub-ANFIS method are 1.67 \({{\text{m}}}^{3}/s\), 0.96 and 0.97, respectively, while these values for the LR are 3.46 \({{\text{m}}}^{3}/s\), 0.83 and 0.87 respectively. Also, in Latyan basin during the gap of 1991–1994, FCM-ANFIS was found to be the best method to recover the missing monthly flow data with RMSE, NSE and \({{\text{R}}}^{2}\) criteria as 3.17 \({{\text{m}}}^{3}/s\), 0.88 and 0.92, respectively. In addition, results indicated that using the seasonal index in the artificial neural network model improves the estimations. Finally, a Social Choice (SC) method using the Borda count was employed to evaluate the overall performance of all methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

All authors made sure that all data and materials support our published claims and comply with field standards.

References

Download references

Funding

No funding was used in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study in all levels and original draft preparation. The study is the result of a graduate level thesis and was guided by Alireza Borhani Dariane as the advisor of Matineh Imani Borhan (student).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Dariane.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dariane, A.B., Borhan, M.I. Comparison of Classical and Machine Learning Methods in Estimation of Missing Streamflow Data. Water Resour Manage 38, 1453–1478 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03730-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03730-7

Keywords

Navigation