Abstract
Under the increasing stormwater events and consequent flood hazards, integrated flood management is increasingly becoming the most essential mitigation strategy to maximize the effectiveness of runoff reduction at the limitation of public budget. The research is aimed at proposed a multi-criteria combination approach to determine spatial intervention prioritization of urban flood based on source tracking analysis. First, Jinhua underpass catchment where an underpass is vulnerable to the impact of stormwater is selected as the case study. Second, source tracking analysis, which combining hydrodynamic model with rainfall-tracking model, is used to obtain the detailed dynamic information including water depth and contribution rate of different source areas. On the basis of source tracking analysis, from the perspective of source-process-end runoff volume management, five types of criteria are presented to evaluate the spatial intervention priority of each sub-area, entropy weight method is applied to combine useful information reflected by criteria 1–5 to form a comprehensive criterion identifying spatial priority of flood management. Notably, the results indicate that criteria extracted by source tracking analysis are highly effective in evaluating spatial priority for urban flood management. Specifically, criteria 1–5 estimate the importance in addressing runoff for different sub-areas from the view of source-progress-end, respectively. Moreover, the comprehensive criterion based on entropy weight method, an objective comprehensive evaluation method, can be used to guide the spatial prioritization of urban flood management for planners and decision-makers with respect to multi-perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Brown RR (2005) Impediments to integrated urban stormwater management: The need for institutional reform. Environ Manag 36(3):455–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0217-4
Cabrera JS, Lee HS (2020) Flood risk assessment for Davao Oriental in the Philippines using geographic information system-based multi-criteria analysis and the maximum entropy model. J Flood Risk Manag 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12607
Dong R, Zhang X, Li H (2019) Constructing the ecological security pattern for sponge city: A case study in Zhengzhou, China. Water 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020284
Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Trowsdale S, Barraud S, Semadeni-Davies A, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L, Mikkelsen PS, Rivard G, Uhl M, Dagenais D, Viklander M (2014) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12(7):525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2014.916314
Glenis V, Kutija V, Kilsby CG (2018) A fully hydrodynamic urban flood modelling system representing buildings, green space and interventions. Environ Model Softw 109:272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.018
Gu X, Ye L, Xin Q, Zhang C, Zeng F, Nerantzaki SD, Papalexiou SM (2022) Extreme precipitation in China: A review on statistical methods and applications. Adv Water Resour 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104144
Hou J, Liang Q, Simons F, Hinkelmann R (2013) A 2D well-balanced shallow flow model for unstructured grids with novel slope source term treatment. Adv Water Resour 52:107–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.08.003
Hou J, Wang N, Guo K, Li D, Jing H, Wang T, Hinkelmann R (2020) Effects of the temporal resolution of storm data on numerical simulations of urban flood inundation. J Hydrol 589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125100
Hou XS, Qin L, Xue XS, Xu SL, Yang YL, Liu X, Li M (2021) A city-scale fully controlled system for stormwater management: Consideration of flooding, non-point source pollution and sewer overflow pollution. J Hydrol 603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127155
Lloyd SD, Wong TH, Chesterfield CJ (2002) Water sensitive urban design – a stormwater management perspective
Merz B, Hall J, Disse M, Schumann A (2010) Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Nat Hazard 10(3):509–527. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
Mignot E, Dewals B (2022) Hydraulic modelling of inland urban flooding: Recent advances. J Hydrol 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127763
Oudin L, Salavati B, Furusho-Percot C, Ribstein P, Saadi M (2018) Hydrological impacts of urbanization at the catchment scale. J Hydrol 559:774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.064
Qi W, Ma C, Hongshi Xu, Chen Z, Zhao K, Han H (2021) Low impact development measures spatial arrangement for urban flood mitigation: an exploratory optimal framework based on source tracking. Water Resour Manag 35(11):3755–3770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02915-2
Qi W, Ma C, Xu H, Zhao K (2022) Urban flood response analysis for designed rainstorms with different characteristics based on a tracer-aided modeling simulation. J Clean Prod 355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131797
Sanders BF (2017) Hydrodynamic modeling of urban flood flows and disaster risk reduction. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.127
Seyedashraf O, Bottacin-Busolin A, Harou JJ (2021) Many-objective optimization of sustainable drainage systems in urban areas with different surface slopes. Water Resour Manag 35(8)
Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305
Vercruysse K, Dawson DA, Glenis V, Bertsch R, Wright N, Kilsby C (2019) Developing spatial prioritization criteria for integrated urban flood management based on a source-to-impact flood analysis. J Hydrol 578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124038
Wang J, Liu JH, Mei C, Wang H, Lu JH (2022a) A multi-objective optimization model for synergistic effect analysis of integrated green-gray-blue drainage system in urban inundation control. Journal of Hydrology 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127725
Wang M, Sweetapple C, Guangtao Fu, Farmani R, Butler D (2017) A framework to support decision making in the selection of sustainable drainage system design alternatives. J Environ Manag 201:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.034
Wang XH, Hou JM, Li DL, Li BY, Gao XJ, Liu Y (2022b) A Coupled Hydrodynamic and Rainfall-tracking Model for Source-to-impact Analysis in Urban Inundation. Water Resour Manag 36(14):5581–5598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03319-6
Wang X, Hou J, Li B, Chai J, Wang J, Zhang W (2022c) Study for underpass inundation process caused by heavy storm using high-resolution urban flood model. Water Resour Manag 36(11):3965–3980
Wang Y, Meng F, Liu H, Zhang C, Fu G (2019) Assessing catchment scale flood resilience of urban areas using a grid cell based metric. Water Res 163:114852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
Xu H, Ma C, Lian J, Kui Xu, Chaima E (2018) Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China. J Hydrol 563:975–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.060
Zhang C, He M, Zhang Y (2019) Urban sustainable development based on the framework of sponge city: 71 case studies in China. Sustainability 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061544
Funding
This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Nos. 52079106, 52009104), the Sino-German Mobility Program (No. M-0427), Key science and technology projects of Power China (DJ-ZDXM-2022–41), Major company-level science and technology projects of Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Power China (XBY-ZDKJ-2022–9), Key R&D Program of Ningxia of China (2022BEG02020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization and Methodology: J. Hou, X. Wang; Writing-original draft preparation: X. Wang; Material preparation, collection and analysis: X. Wang, G. Hu, X. Gao; Supervision: R. Shen; Funding acquisition: J. Hou.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Informed consent.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
The authors are indeed informed and agree to publish.
Competing Interests
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled “A multi-criteria combination approach to determine spatial intervention prioritization of urban flood based on source tracking analysis”.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11269_2023_3700_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Supplementary file1 Plots of contribution rate at t = 4 hour for all source areas can be shown in Supplemental material (DOCX 25190 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Hou, J., Hu, G. et al. A Multi-Criteria Combination Approach to Determine Spatial Intervention Prioritization of Urban Flood Based on Source Tracking Analysis. Water Resour Manage 38, 893–914 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03700-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03700-z