Skip to main content
Log in

The Dynamics of the Relationship Between Water Availability, Water Equity, Economic Benefits and Water User Associations’ Performance: A PLS-SEM Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water availability, water equity, farmers’ participation, compliance with rules and conflicts, and water theft management are the main drivers of water user associations’ (WUAs) performance. The main objective of the study was to find out the relationship between water availability, water equity, economic benefits, and WUAs' performance. This study was conducted in 2 distributaries at the Lower Chenab Canal west area water board in the district of Faisalabad, Pakistan. A multistage random sampling technique was used to collect the data from 240 farmers using a well-structured questionnaire. A PLS-SEM model was used to analyze the structural paths between water availability, water equity, economic benefits, and WUAs' performance. The measurement model by using Cronbach’s alpha, rho-A, composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) has confirmed the internal reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Results indicate that timely water availability, less water shortage, and timely repair and maintenance were the core influencing indicators with high factor loadings (> 0.70) to the water availability construct that significantly positively influencing the economic benefits(β = 0.74, p = 000) and performance of WUAs (β = 0.34, p = 000). Equitable distribution of water across the farm size, location, ethnic groups, and greater fair and justice were the substantial influencing indicators with high loadings (> 0.80) to the water equity construct that has positive and direct significant influence on the performance of WUAs (β = 0.48, p = 000). It has been evaluated that water availability and economic benefits had a positive and indirect impact on the WUAs performance (β = 0.09, p = 000). Besides the insights of all the drivers of performance of WUAs, the study recommended that WUAs management system still in infancy even after the decades of its establishment and establishing the parallel institutes are neither sufficient nor mandatory. Furthermore, there is a need to reconsider the inner structure of WUAs management and establishment of cohesion among all the stakeholders in decision making. There is also a need to provide trainings to farmers and WUAs officials for effective management of WUAs system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abdelhafidh H, Bachta MS, Khamassi K, Chaabane R, Kharrat M, Naceur MB (2017) Effect of water users associations’ financial performances on small farms’ productivity. J New Sci 41

  • Ahmad B, Pham HD, Ashfaq M, Memon JA, Bano R, Dahri ZH, Mustafa RN, Baig IA, Naseer MAUR (2020) Impact of institutional features on the overall performance assessment of participatory irrigation management: Farmers’ response from Pakistan. Water 12:497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Perret SR, Imran M, Qaisrani SA (2021) Assessing the physical water availability and revenue aspect of WUAs under new governance system: Case studies of Pakistan. In Water Security in Asia (pp. 251–260). Springer, Cham

  • Akhtar MJU, Cepiku D (2013) Participatory irrigation management in Pakistan: Initial results of a pilot project. South Asian Water Stud 4:4–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Anser MK, Hina T, Hameed S, Nasir MH, Ahmad I, Naseer MAUR (2020) Modeling adaptation strategies against climate change impacts in integrated rice-wheat agricultural production system of Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(7):2522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruna G, Singh DR, Kumar S, Kumar A (2012) Canal irrigation management through Water Users Associations and its impact on efficiency, Equity and reliability in water use in Tamil Nadu. Agric Econ Res Rev 25:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Baig IA, Ashfaq M, Hassan H, Mushtaq K, Raza MA (2009) An analysis of irrigation reforms and their impact on rural livelihood in Punjab. Pakistan. J Agric Res 47(3)

  • Balasubramanya S, Buisson MC, Saikia P, MacDonald K, Aslamy S, Horbulyk T, Platonov A (2016) Impact of Water Users Associations on water and land productivity, equity and food security in Tajikistan. Baseline Tech Rep Int Water Manag Inst

  • Bekchanov M, Karimov A, Lamers JP (2010) Impact of water availability on land and water productivity: a temporal and spatial analysis of the case study region Khorezm. Uzbekistan Water 2(3):668–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti A, Rehman SU, Rumman JBA (2020) Organizational capabilities mediates between organizational culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance of SMEs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurial Bus Econ Rev 8(4):85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Tol RS (2011) Water scarcity and the impact of improved irrigation management: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Agric Econ 42(3):305–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crase L (2020) Using applied economics to study participatory irrigation institutions and their impact in South Asia. Water 12(7):2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crase L, Gandhi VP (2009) Reforming institutions in water resource management: Policy and performance for sustainable development. Routledge

  • Farooq M, Shakoor A (2013) Severe energy crises and solar thermal energy as a viable option for Pakistan. J Renew Sustain Energy 5 (1):13104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4772637

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18(3):382–388

  • Gandhi VP, Johnson N (2019) Enhancing performance of participatory water institutions in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains: what can we learn from new institutional economics and governance theories? Water 12(1):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi VP, Johnson N (2020) Enhancing performance of participatory water institutions in the eastern Indo-Gangetic plains: What can we learn from new institutional economics and governance theories? Water 12:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghumman AR, Ahmad S, Hashmi HN, Khan R (2014) Comparative evaluation of implementing participatory irrigation management in Punjab, Pakistan. Irrig Drain 63:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güvercin Ö, Boz İ (2003) Üreticilerin sulu tarım konusundaki deneyimleri ve sulama birliklerine bakışı: Düziçi ilçesi örneği. KSÜ Fen Ve Mühendislik Dergisi 6(2):80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL (2017) An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst 117(3):442–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq S, Boz I, Shahbaz P, Yıldırım Ç (2020) Evaluating eco-efficiency and optimal levels of fertilizer use based on the social cost and social benefits in tea production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:33008–33019

  • Hone S, Crase L, Burton M, Cooper B, Gandhi VP, Ashfaq M, Lashari B, Ahmad B (2020) Farmer cooperation in participatory irrigation in South Asia: Insights from game theory. Water 12:1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourneaux F Jr, da Silva Gabriel ML, Gallardo-Vázquez DA (2018) Triple bottom line and sustainable performance measurement in industrial companies. Revista De Gestão 25(4):413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazbekov J, Abdullaev I, Manthrithilake H, Qureshi A, Jumaboev K (2009) Evaluating planning and delivery performance of water user associations (WUAs) in Osh Province, Kyrgyzstan. Agric Water Manag 96(8):1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manero A, Wheeler SA (2022) Perceptions of Tanzanian smallholder irrigators on impact pathways between water equity and socioeconomic inequalities. Int J Water Resour Dev 38(1):80–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen DK, Channa H, Ringler C (2015) The impact of water users’ associations on the productivity of irrigated agriculture in Pakistani Punjab. Water Int 40(5–6):733–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2016) Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci Adv 2:e1500323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikalef P, Pateli A, van de Wetering R (2021) IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralization as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. Eur J Inf Syst 30(5):512–540

  • Mochalova E (2014) Institutions as Key Drivers of Collective Action in WUAs of Uzbekistan. Gwangju, South Korea: Elizaveta Mochalova (Curator)

  • Muchara B, Ortmann G, Wale E, Mudhara M (2014) Collective action and participation in irrigation water management: A case study of Mooi River Irrigation Scheme in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Water SA 40(4):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtinho F, Tague C, De Bièvre B, Eakin H, Lopez-Carr D (2013) Water scarcity in the Andes: a comparison of local perceptions and observed climate, land use and socioeconomic changes. Hum Ecol 41(5):667–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagrah A, Chaudhry AM, Giordano M (2016) Collective action in decentralized irrigation systems: Evidence from Pakistan. World Dev 84:282–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseer, M.a.U.R., Ashfaq, M., Razzaq, A., and Ali, Q. (2020) Comparison of water use efficiency, profitability and consumer preferences of different rice varieties in Punjab, Pakistan. Paddy Water Environ, 18:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosair AM, Shams MY, AbouElmagd LM, Hassanein AE, Fryar AE, Abu Salem HS (2022) Predictive model for progressive salinization in a coastal aquifer using artificial intelligence and hydrogeochemical techniques: A case study of the Nile Delta aquifer, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(6):9318–9340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaq A, Qing P, Naseer, M.a.U.R., Abid, M., Anwar, M., and Javed, I. (2019) Can the informal groundwater markets improve water use efficiency and equity? Evidence from a semi-arid region of Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 666:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman Khan SA, Yu Z (2021) Assessing the eco-environmental performance: an PLS-SEM approach with practice-based view. Int J Log Res Appl 24(3):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Ashfaq M (2019) Impact of participatory irrigation management on water availability and agricultural productivity. In conference: Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES), February 12–15, 2019, Melbourne, Australia (No. 2186–2019–1412)

  • Sarkar A, Azim JA, Al Asif A, Qian L, Peau AK (2021) Structural equation modeling for indicators of sustainable agriculture: Prospective of a developing country’s agriculture. Land Use Policy 109:105638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senanayake I, Dissanayake D, Mayadunna B, Weerasekera W (2016) An approach to delineate groundwater recharge potential sites in Ambalantota, Sri Lanka using GIS techniques. Geosci Front 7:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz P, Boz I, Haq SU (2017) Determinants of crop diversification in mixed cropping zone of Punjab Pakistan. Direct Res J Agric Food Sci 5(11):360–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz P, Haq SU, Boz I (2022) Linking climate change adaptation practices with farm technical efficiency and fertilizer use: A study of wheat–maize mix cropping zone of Punjab province, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(12):16925–16938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzadi A, Li S, Sahibzada UF, Malik M, Khalid R, Afshan G (2021) The dynamic relationship of knowledge management processes and project success: modeling the mediating role of knowledge worker satisfaction. Bus Process Manag J 27(6):1657–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Liebrand J, Joshi D (2014) Cultivating “success” and “failure” in policy: participatory irrigation management in Nepal. Dev Pract 24:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Kulkarni S (2014) Examining the emerging role of groundwater in water inequity in India. Water Int 39(2):172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastav AL, Pham TD, Izah SC, Singh N, Singh PK (2021) Biochar adsorbents for arsenic removal from water environment: A review. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1–13. 

  • Taheri B, Bititci U, Gannon MJ, Cordina R (2019) Investigating the influence of performance measurement on learning, entrepreneurial orientation and performance in turbulent markets. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 31(3):1224–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal ÖK, Atış E (2010) Assessing the performance of participatory irrigation management over time: A case study from Turkey. Agric Water Manag 97(7):1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafaei E, Ahangarkolaee SS, Lucas-Borja ME, Fami HS, Zema DA (2021) A framework to evaluate the factors influencing groundwater management in Water User Associations: The case study of Tafresh County (Iran). Agric Water Manag 255:107013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Ma L, Zhang Y, Chen N, Wang W (2022) Spatiotemporal dynamics of wetlands and their driving factors based on PLS-SEM: A case study in Wuhan. Sci Total Environ 806:151310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Huang J, Zhang L, Huang Q, Rozelle S (2010) Water governance and water use efficiency: The five principles of WUA management and performance in China 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 46(4):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yercan M, Atis E, Salali HECE (2009) Assessing irrigation performance in the Gediz River Basin of Turkey: water user associations versus cooperatives. Irrig Sci 27(4):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Heerink N, Dries L, Shi X (2013) Water users associations and irrigation water productivity in northern China. Ecol Econ 95:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulfiqar F, Shahzad S, Abid M, Ullah R (2017) Managing water commons and the extent of their climate resilience in Punjab, Pakistan. Conference Paper, Indiana University, Digital Library of Commons

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Mohsin Riaz], [Muhammad Ashfaq] and [Ismet Boz]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Pomi Shahbaz] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsin Riaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riaz, M., Ashfaq, M., Boz, I. et al. The Dynamics of the Relationship Between Water Availability, Water Equity, Economic Benefits and Water User Associations’ Performance: A PLS-SEM Approach. Water Resour Manage 37, 4537–4552 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03578-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03578-x

Keywords

Navigation