Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Manning Roughness Coefficient in Alluvial Rivers with Bed Forms Using Soft Computing Models

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flow conditions (flow discharge, flow depth, and flow velocity) in natural streams are mainly determined via the flow resistance formula such as Manning’s equation. Evaluating the accurate Manning’s roughness coefficient (n), especially in rivers with bed form during floods, to obtain more reliable results has always been of interest to scholars. The interaction between the flow and bed form is very complex since the flow conditions control bed forms, and vice versa. The main goal of the present study is to predict n in rivers with bed forms, using soft computing models, including multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLPNN), group method of data handling (GMDH), support vector machine (SVM) model, and genetic programming model (GP). To this end, the energy grade line (\({S}_{f}\)), flow Froude number (Fr), the relative submergence (\(y/{d}_{50}\); y = flow depth and d50 = bed sediment size), and the bed form dimensionless parameters (\(\Delta /{d}_{50}\), \(\Delta /\lambda\), and \(\Delta /y\); ∆ = bed form height and λ = bed form length) were used as the input variables, and n was used as the output variable. The results showed that all the test models have acceptable accuracy, while the SVM model showed the highest level of accuracy with the coefficient of determination \({R}^{2}=0.99\) in the verification stage. The sensitivity analysis of SVM and MLPNN models and the structural analysis of GMDH and GP models indicated that the most important parameters affecting n are Fr, \({S}_{f}\), and \(\Delta /\lambda\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that some data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

A :

The corresponding coefficients (\(A=\left({a}_{1},{a}_{2}, \cdots {a}_{m}\right)\))

\(\overline{{a }_{i}}\) :

The average of the Lagrange coefficients

B :

The channel width

b :

The constant in the regression function

C :

A positive integer that determines the penalty when a model training error occurs

\({d}_{50}\) :

The average diameter of sediment particles

\(f\) :

The target function

FFNN:

The feed-forward neural network model

Fr :

The flow Froude number

G :

Gravitational acceleration

GMDH:

Group method of data handling

GP:

Genetic programming model

G s :

The relative density of sediment particles

MAPE:

Mean absolute percentage error

MLP-FFA:

Multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm model

MLPNN:

Multilayer perceptron artificial neural network

N :

The number of samples (data used for training)

\(n\) :

The total Manning roughness coefficient

\(n''\)  :

The bed form related to the Manning roughness coefficient

\(O\) :

The observed value

\(\overline{O }\) :

The mean observed value

\(P\) :

The calculated value

\(\overline{P }\) :

The mean calculated value

R :

Correlation coefficient

Re :

The flow Reynolds number

RMSE:

Root mean square error

R2 :

The coefficient of determination

\({S}_{f}\) :

The energy grade line

SI:

The scatter index

SVM:

Support vector machine model

V :

The average flow velocity

\({W}^{T}\) :

The transpose of the coefficient matrix

x :

The input variables (\(x=\left({x}_{1},{x}_{2}, \cdots {x}_{m}\right)\))

\({X}_{j}\) :

The calculated value for the chromosome by fitting function \(j\)

y :

The average flow depth

\({Y}_{j}\) :

The measured value or the expected value of the chromosome by fitting \(j\)

α :

The angle of the upstream side of the bed form relative to the horizon

θ :

The angle of the downstream side of the bed form relative to the horizon

λ :

The length of the bed form

Δ :

The height of the bed form

\(\varphi\) :

The kernel function

\({\rho }_{s}\) :

The specific mass of sediment particles

\({\rho }_{w}\) :

The specific mass of water

\(\mu\) :

The dynamic viscosity of water

References

  • Afzalimehr H, Singh VP, Najafabadi EF (2010) Determination of form friction factor. J Hydrol Eng 15(3):237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan Ž (2011) A model of adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for prediction of friction coefficient in open channel flow. Sci Res Essays 6(5):1020–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Jarrett RD (2013) Use of gene-expression programming to estimate Manning’s roughness coefficient for high gradient streams. Water Resour Manage 27:715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Haghiabi AH, Parsaie A (2016) Prediction of side weir discharge coefficient by support vector machine technique. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16(4):1002–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BahramiYarahmadi M, ShafaiBejestan M (2011) Experimental study of the effect of sediment particles shape on Manning’s coefficient. J Water Soil 25(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakenhoff L, Schrijvershof R, Van Der Werf J, Grasmeijer B, Ruessink G, Van Der Vegt M (2020) From ripples to large-scale sand transport: The effects of bedform-related roughness on hydrodynamics and sediment transport patterns in delft3d. J Mar Sci Eng 8(11):892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chegini A, Pender G (2012) Determination of small size bed load sediment transport and its related bed form under different uniform flow conditions. WSEAS E-ISSN 8(4):158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff JE (1990) Neural network architectures: An introduction. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey S (2014) Fluvial hydrodynamics, vol 818. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Paul P, Fang H, Padhi E (2020) Hydrodynamics of flow over two-dimensional dunes. Phys Fluids 32(2):025106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydari M, BahramiYarahmadi M, ShafaiBejestan M (2022) Experimental study of the effect of bed forms on Darcy-Weisbach friction coefficient in straight open channels. J Hydraul 17(1):35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhnenko AG (1968) The group method of data handling, a rival of the method of stochastic approximation. Soviet Autom Control 13(3):43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY (2010) Erosion and sedimentation. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kabiri F, Afzalimehr H, Smart G, Rousseau AN (2014) Flow over gravel dunes. Br J Appl Sci Technol 4(6):905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1992) Evolution of subsumption using genetic programming. Proceedings of the first European conference on artificial life. MIT Press, pp 110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoll E, Venditti J, Bradley R, Winter C (2016) Flow structure and resistance over subaquaeous high-and low-angle dunes. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121(3):545–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiri Dehsorkhi E, Afzalimehr H, Singh VP (2011) Effect of bed forms and vegetated banks on velocity distributions and turbulent flow structure. J Hydrol Eng 16(6):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niazkar M, Talebbeydokhti N, Afzali SH (2019) Novel grain and form roughness estimator scheme incorporating artificial intelligence models. Water Resour Manage 33:757–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhravi S, Gohari S (2020) Form friction factor of armored riverbeds. Can J Civ Eng 47(11):1238–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omid MH, Karbasi M, Farhoudi J (2010) Effects of bed-load movement on flow resistance over bed forms. Sadhana 35(6):681–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsaie A, Haghiabi AH, Saneie M, Torabi H (2018) Prediction of energy dissipation of flow over stepped spillways using data-driven models. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 42(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Saghebian SM, Mouaze D (2017) Predicting characteristics of dune bedforms using PSO-LSSVM. Int J Sedim Res 32(4):515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Alami MT, Saghebian SM (2018) Modeling open channel flow resistance with dune bedform via heuristic and nonlinear approaches. J Hydroinf 20(2):356–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi-Movahed F, Najafzadeh M, Mehrpooya A (2020) Receiving more accurate predictions for longitudinal dispersion coefficients in water pipelines: Training group method of data handling using extreme learning machine conceptions. Water Resour Manage 34(2):529–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02463-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghebian SM, Roushangar K, OzgurKirca VS, Ghasempour R (2020) Modeling total resistance and form resistance of movable bed channels via experimental data and a kernel-based approach. J Hydroinf 22(3):528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons DB, Richardson EV, Albertson ML (1961) Flume studies using medium sand (0.45 mm). Colorado State University. Libraries

  • Simons DB, Richardson EV (1966) Resistance to flow in alluvial channels. US Government Printing Office

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Sihag P, Parsaie A, Angelaki A (2021) Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence techniques for the prediction of infiltration process. Geol Ecol Landscapes 5(2):109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebbeydokhti N, Hekmatzadeh A, Rakhshandehrou GR (2006) Experimental modeling of dune bed form in a sand-bed channel. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 30(4):503–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanoni VA (2006) Sedimentation engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vatanchi SM, Maghrebi MF (2019) Uncertainty in rating-curves due to Manning roughness coefficient. Water Resour Manage 33:5153–5167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao L, Peng Y, Yu X, Zhang Z, Luo S (2023) Optimal inversion of Manning’s roughness in unsteady open flow simulations using adaptive parallel Genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manage 37:879–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuhong Z, Wenxin H (2009) Application of artificial neural network to predict the friction factor of open channel flow. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14(5):2373–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanganeh M, Rastegar A (2020) Estimation of roughness coefficient in erodible channels by ANNs and the ANFIS methods. Amirkabir J Civ Eng 52(2):495–512. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2018.14532.5678

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for financial support (SCU.WH1400.31373).

Funding

The funding of this research was provided by the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (Grant number: SCU.WH1400.31373).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MBY, AP, MSB: Data Analysis, Supervision, Validation, Writing-Reviewing, and Editing. MH, MB: Conducting experiments and data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Bahrami Yarahmadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

The authors declare their consent to the publication of the manuscript in “Water Resources Management” journal.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yarahmadi, M.B., Parsaie, A., Shafai-Bejestan, M. et al. Estimation of Manning Roughness Coefficient in Alluvial Rivers with Bed Forms Using Soft Computing Models. Water Resour Manage 37, 3563–3584 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03514-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03514-z

Keywords

Navigation