Abstract
In order to more reasonably predict runoff under extreme precipitation and corresponding meteorological conditions, and explore the influences of annual precipitation and extreme precipitation on the runoff process, this paper proposes an improved precipitation stochastic simulation model and combine it with Weather Generator based on Dry and Wet Spells (WGDWS) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Taking a typical mountainous basin in North China, the basin above the Wangkuai Reservoir, as the study area, the daily precipitation process and corresponding meteorological data for six extreme precipitation scenarios are generated as inputs of the SWAT model to predict monthly runoff. The results reveal that the annual runoff under the six scenarios is 5.41 m3/s, 5.95 m3/s, 6.57 m3/s, 7.02 m3/s, 7.74 m3/s and 8.04 m3/s, with maximum monthly runoff of 18.10 m3/s, 21.71 m3/s, 21.94 m3/s, 32.69 m3/s, 34.33 m3/s, 43.72 m3/s, respectively. For the same annual precipitation, the extreme precipitation magnitude has a significant effect on annual runoff, but this impact weakens as annual precipitation increases, and the influence on monthly runoff is reflected mainly in August. Moreover, under the same extreme precipitation conditions, the annual runoff increases by approximately 10% if the annual precipitation increases by 100 mm, and the influence on monthly runoff is reflected only in July. The coupling of the improved precipitation stochastic simulation, WGDWS and SWAT model not only presents a technical reference for water conservancy project operation management and water resource management under extreme precipitation scenarios, but also provides a new idea for predicting runoff under extreme precipitation and corresponding meteorological conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Al-alawi M, Bouferguene A, Mohamed Y (2017) Non-parametric weather generator for modelling construction operations: comparison with the parametric approach and evaluation of construction-based impacts. Autom Constr 75:108–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.014
Aznarez C, Jimeno-Saez P, Lopez-Ballesteros A, Pacheco JP, Senent-Aparicio J (2021) Analysing the impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Laguna del Sauce (Uruguay) using the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13102014
Bermudez M, Cea L, Van Uytven E, Willems P, Farfan JF, Puertas J (2020) A robust method to Update Local River Inundation Maps using global climate model output and Weather typing based statistical downscaling. Water Resour Manage 34(14):4345–4362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02673-7
Chen J, Arsenault R, Brissette FP, Cote P, Su TH (2019) Coupling annual, monthly and daily weather generators to simulate multisite and multivariate climate variables with low-frequency variability for hydrological modelling. Clim Dyn 53(7–8):3841–3860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04750-z
Chen Y, Marek GW, Marek TH, Porter DO, Moorhead JE, Heflin KR, Brauer DK, Srinivasan R (2020) Watershed scale evaluation of an improved SWAT auto-irrigation function. Environ Model Softw 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104789
Eingruber N, Korres W (2022) Climate change simulation and trend analysis of extreme precipitation and floods in the mesoscale Rur catchment in western Germany until 2099 using Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) and the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT model). Science of The Total Environment. 838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155775
El Harraki W, Quazar D, Bouziane A, El Harraki I, Hasnaoui D (2021) Streamflow Prediction Upstream of a dam using SWAT and Assessment of the impact of land use spatial resolution on Model Performance. Environ Processes 8(3):1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00532-0
Fadhil RM, Unami K (2021) A multi-state Markov chain model to assess drought risks in rainfed agriculture: a case study in the Nineveh Plains of Northern Iraq. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35(9):1931–1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01991-5
Femeena PV, Chaubey I, Aubeneau A, Mcmillan SK, Wagner PD, Fohrer N (2020) An improved process-based representation of stream solute transport in the soil and water assessment tools. Hydrol Process 34(11):2599–2611. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13751
Gautam S, Dahal V, Bhattarai R (2019) Impacts of dem source, resolution and area threshold values on SWAT generated Stream Network and Streamflow in two distinct nepalese catchments. Environ Processes 6(3):597–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00379-6
Ghosh NC, Jaiswal RK, Ali S (2020) Normalized antecedent precipitation index based model for prediction of runoff from un-gauged catchments. Water Resour Manage 35(4):1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02775-w
Gulbin S, Kirilenko AP, Kharel G, Zhang XD (2019) Wetland loss impact on long term flood risks in a closed watershed. Environ Sci Policy 94:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.032
Jhong BC, Tung CP (2018) Evaluating future joint probability of precipitation extremes with a copula-based assessing approach in climate change. Water Resour Manage 32(13):4253–4274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2045-y
Joo J, Zhang AJ, Li X, Zheng CM (2018) Hydrological responses to climate shifts for a minimally disturbed mountainous watershed in northwestern China. Hydrol Sci J 62(9):1440–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1316851
Li ZW, Xu X, Zhu JX, Zhong FX, Xu CH, Wang KL (2021) Can precipitation extremes explain variability in runoff and sediment yield across heterogeneous karst watersheds. J Hydrol 596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125698
Melaku ND, Wang JY, Meshesha TW (2020) Improving hydrologic model to predict the effect of snowpack and soil temperature on carbon dioxide emission in the cold region peatlands. J Hydrol 587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124939
Meshesha TW, Wang JY, Melaku ND, Mcclain CN (2021) Modelling groundwater quality of the Athabasca River basin in the subarctic region using a modified SWAT model. Sci Rep 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06145-3
Moon KH, Song EY, Son I, Wi SH, Oh S, Hyun HN (2017) Estimation of Markov chain and gamma distribution parameters for generation of daily precipitation data from monthly data. [In South Korea] Korean J Agric For Meteorol 19(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2017.19.1.27
Mukundan R, Acharya N, Gelda RK, Frei A, Owens EM (2019) Modeling streamflow sensitivity to climate change in New York City water supply streams using a stochastic weather generator. J Hydrol-Reg Stud 21:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.01.001
Paik S, Min SK (2018) Assessing the impact of volcanic eruptions on Climate Extremes using CMIP5 models. J Clim 31(14):5333–5349. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0651.1
Pokhrel P, Ohgushi K, Fujita M (2019) Impacts of future climate variability on hydrological processes in the upstream catchment of Kase River basin, Japan. Appl Water Sci 9(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0896-x
Shao QX, Zhang LE, Wang QJ (2016) A hybrid stochastic-weather-generation method for temporal disaggregation of precipitation with consideration of seasonality and within-month variations. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 30(6):1705–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1177-3
Sun T, Cheng WQ, Bo QY, Meng X, Liang D (2021) Analysis on historical flood and countermeasures in prevention and control of flood in Daqing River basin. Environ Res 196(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110895
Tsegaye L, Bharti R (2022) The impacts of LULC and climate change scenarios on the hydrology and sediment yield of Rib watershed, Ethiopia. Environ Monit Assess 194(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10391-3
Wang WG, Zou S, Shao QX, Xing WQ, Chen X, Jiao XY, Luo YF, Yong B, Yu ZB (2016) The analytical derivation of multiple elasticities of runoff to climate change and catchment characteristics alteration. J Hydrol 541:1042–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.014
Wu ZY, Chen X, Lu GH, Xiao H, He H, Zhang JH (2015) Regional response of runoff in CMIP5 multi-model climate projections of Jiangsu Province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31(10):2627–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1349-9
Yang H, Li WD (2023) Data decomposition, seasonal adjustment method and machine learning combined for runoff prediction: a case study. Water Resour Manage 37(1):557–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03389-6
Yang LH, Zhong PA, Zhu FL, Ma YF, Wang H, Li JY, Xu CJ (2021) A comparison of the reproducibility of regional precipitation properties simulated respectively by weather generators and stochastic simulation methods. Stoch Environ Res Rick Assess 36(2):495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02053-6
Zhang JP, Wang YH (2022) Runoff prediction under different precipitation scenarios based on SWAT model and stochastic simulation of precipitation. J Hydrol Eng 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002173
Zeng WY, Song SB, Kang Y, Gao X, Ma R (2022) Response of runoff to meteorological factors based on time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model with stochastic volatility in arid and semi-arid area of Weihe River Basin. Sustainability 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126989
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences Foundation of Henan Province (Grant No. 212300410404), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFC3200205).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. JZ: Conceptualization, Methodology. DW: Methodology, Writing – original draft. YW: Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HX: Software, Data curation. MZ: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All authors kept the “Ethical Responsibilities of Authors”.
Consent to Participate
All authors gave explicit consent to participate in this study.
Consent to Publish
All authors gave explicit consent to publish this manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Wang, D., Wang, Y. et al. Runoff Prediction Under Extreme Precipitation and Corresponding Meteorological Conditions. Water Resour Manage 37, 3377–3394 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03506-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03506-z