Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Analysis of Rainwater Harvesting System and Conventional Sources of Water

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rainwater harvesting systems have been studied in different regions considering their performance, design, and life cycle analysis. However, their performance has not been compared with conventional water sources. The novelty of this study rests in examining the performance and potency of the rainwater harvesting system and the conventional sources of water for potable and non-potable demand. This study has two-fold objectives. Firstly, the challenges and sufficiency of existing water sources for potable and non-potable demand are examined by considering the water gallon delivery at the doorstep, government supply line, tanker-based supply, and extraction of water through bore wells. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness of several water sources is examined using four models. Each model combines water sources for potable and non-potable demand. A comparison is drawn between the cost-effectiveness of current practices and the rainwater harvesting system. The findings suggest that the rainwater harvesting system is more cost-effective than conventional water sources; however, it needs to be coupled with the government supply line to meet the non-potable water demand. On average, five other houses can be covered by the rainwater harvesting system. Implications are drawn to help governments and practitioners consider sustainable social well-being actions and promote rain harvesting through rebates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Data will be made available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

\(TAC\) :

Tanker capacity (Litres)

\(\omega\) :

Fraction of additional houses in the street (dimensionless)

\({c}_{gt}\) :

Cost of government tanker/order (PKR/tanker)

\({c}_{pt}\) :

Cost of private tanker/order (PKR/tanker)

\({CG}_{year}\) :

Cost of government supply through lines per year (PKR/year)

\(D\) :

Yearly water demand of a household (\(D={D}_{NP}+D_{P}\); Litres)

\({D}_{NP}\) :

Yearly non-potable water demand of a household (Litres)

\({D}_{P}\) :

Yearly potable water demand of a household (Litres)

\({TC}_{NP}^{M1}\) :

The Total cost of non-potable water of Model 1 (supply through lines, government tanker, private tanker) (PKR)

\({TC}_{NP}^{M2}\) :

The Total cost of non-potable water of Model 2 (total cost of boring (PKR))

\({TC}_{NP}^{M3}\) :

The Total cost of non-potable water of Model 3 (cost of RWH system (PKR))

\({TC}_{NP}^{M4}\) :

The Total cost of non-potable water of Model 4 (cost of RWH system and supply through lines (PKR))

\({FC}_{B}\) :

Fixed cost of boring (PKR)

\({VC}_{B}\) :

The Variable cost of boring (PKR)

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Salam Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors consent for publications.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A.S. A Comparative Analysis of Rainwater Harvesting System and Conventional Sources of Water. Water Resour Manage 37, 2083–2106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03479-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03479-z

Keywords

Navigation