Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of Agricultural Surface Water Distribution Systems Based on Water-food-energy Nexus and Using AHP-Entropy-WASPAS Technique

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the performance of practical alternatives in modernization projects of water distribution in irrigation networks based on the water-food-energy nexus using the AHP-Entropy-WASPAS technique. Three methods of improved manual operation, decentralized automatic operation, and centralized automatic operation were developed under normal and water shortage operation scenarios and modeling the current status of water distribution in the main canal of the Rudasht irrigation network as a case study. Water-based, energy-based and food-based indicators were used to develop the nexus evaluation framework. The results showed that the average values of the water-food-energy nexus index in the manual operation method were estimated at 0.49 and 0.16 under normal and water shortage operation scenarios, respectively. These average values were estimated at 0.53 and 0.17 under normal and water shortage operation scenarios, respectively, by improving the method to the improved manual operation method. The decentralized automatic operation method improved these average values to 0.82 and 0.39 under normal and water shortage operation scenarios. Finally, using the centralized automatic operation method, these average values were 0.94 and 0.35 under normal and water shortage operation scenarios. Since the downstream secondary off-takes of the irrigation network receive no water even by upgrading the surface water distribution system to the decentralized automatic operation method under the water shortage operation scenario, it can be said that the performance of the centralized automatic operation method is more efficient than the decentralized automatic operation method due to the fair and uniform distribution of water in both normal and water shortage scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig.4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

References

  • Allam MM, Eltahir EA (2019) Water-Energy-Food Nexus Sustainability in the Upper Blue Nile (UBN) Basin. Front Environ Sci 7(5):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Aomar RA (2010) A combined ahp-entropy method for deriving subjective and objective criteria weights. Int J Ind Eng 17(1):12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshianlamouki E, Masia S, Karimi P, van der Zaag P, Sušnik J (2020) A system dynamics model to quantify the impacts of restoration measures on the water-energy-food nexus in the Urmia lake Basin, Iran. Sci Total Environ 708:134874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgi A, Roozbahani A, Hashemy Shahdany SM, Abbassi R (2021) Development of multi-hazard risk assessment model for agricultural water supply and distribution systems using bayesian network. Water Resour Manag Springer 35(10):3139–3159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorg-Haddad O, Azarnivand A, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Loáiciga HA (2017) WASPAS application and evolutionary algorithm benchmarking in optimal reservoir optimization problems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143(1):04016070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daher BT, Mohtar RH (2015) Water–energy–food (WEF) Nexus Tool 2.0: guiding integrative resource planning and decision-making. Water Int 40(5–6):748–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimzadeh Azbari K, Ashofteh PS, Golfam P, Singh VP (2021) Optimal wastewater allocation with the development of an SECA multi-criteria decision-making method. J Clean Prod 321:129041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gafy I (2017) Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water–energy–food nexus of crop’s production system applying the indicators approach. Appl Water Sci 7(6):2857–2868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemy Shahdany SM, Roozbahani A (2016) Selecting an appropriate operational method for main irrigation canals within multi-criteria decision-making methods. J Irrig Drain Eng 142(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini Jolfan M, Hashemy Shahdany SM, Javadi S, Mallakpour I, Neshat A (2019) Effects of canal automation on reducing groundwater extraction within irrigation districts: Case study of Qazvin irrigation district. Irrig Drain 69(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaghazchi A, Shahdany SMH, Roozbahani A (2021) Simulation and evaluation of agricultural water distribution and delivery systems with a Hybrid Bayesian network model. Agric Water Manag 245:106578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamrani K, Roozbahani A, Shahdany SMH (2020) Using Bayesian networks to evaluate how agricultural water distribution systems handle the water-food-energy nexus. Agric Water Manag 239:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnib A (2017) A quantitative assessment framework for water, energy and food nexus. Comput Water Energy Environ Eng 6(1):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khiabani MY, Shahdany SMH, Hassani Y, Maestre JM (2021) Introducing an economic agricultural water distribution in a hyper-arid region: a case study in Iran. J Hydroinf 1–20

  • Li M, Fu Q, Singh VP, Ji Y, Liu D, Zhang C, Li T (2019a) An optimal modelling approach for managing agricultural water-energy-food nexus under uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 651:1416–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Sun H, Singh VP, Zhou Y, Ma M (2019b) Agricultural water resources management using maximum entropy and entropy-weight-based TOPSIS methods. Entropy 21(4):364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez P, Blanco M, Castro-Campos B (2018) The water–energy–food nexus: A fuzzy-cognitive mapping approach to support nexus-compliant policies in Andalusia (Spain). Water 10(5):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei A, Saghafian B, Mirchi A, Madani K (2019) The groundwater-energy-food nexus in Iran’s agricultural sector: implications for water security. Water 11(9):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molden D, Gates T (1990) Performance measures for evaluation of irrigation-water-delivery systems. J Irrig Drain Eng 116:804–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molajou A, Afshar A, Khosravi M et al (2021) A new paradigm of water, food, and energy nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orojloo M, Shahdany SMH, Roozbahani A (2018) Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches. Sci Total Environ 627:1363–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani A, Ebrahimi E, Banihabib ME (2018) A framework for ground water management based on bayesian network and MCDM techniques. Water Resour Manag 32(15):4985–5005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos HM, Morillo JG, Diaz JAR, Carravetta A, McNabola A (2021) Sustainable water-energy nexus towards developing countries’ water sector efficiency. Energies 14:3525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani A, Ghased H, Shahedany MH (2020) Inter-basin water transfer planning with grey COPRAS and fuzzy COPRAS techniques: A case study in Iranian Central Plateau. Sci Total Environ 138499:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process: planning, priority, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Sarkar D, Mondal P, Goswami S (2020) GIS and multi-criteria decision-making assessment of sites suitability for agriculture in an anabranching site of sooin river, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1–18

  • Schuurmans J (1997) Control of Water Levels in Open Channels, TUDelft, (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. thesis)

  • Tork H, Javadi S, Shahdany SMH (2021) A new framework of a multi-criteria decision making for agriculture water distribution system. J Clean Prod 306:127178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuş A, Adalı EA (2019) The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch 56(2):528–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overloop PJ (2006) Model predictive control on open water systems (IOS Press)

  • Yunus RM, Samadi Z, Yusop NM, Omar D (2013) Expert choice for ranking heritage streets. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 101:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J, Zakarevicius A (2012) Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektron Elektrotech 122(6):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Fatemeh Bayat: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing -original draft. Abbas Roozbahani: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing—Review & Editing. Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany: Supervision, Validation, Writing—Review & Editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Abbas Roozbahani or Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayat, F., Roozbahani, A. & Hashemy Shahdany, S.M. Performance Evaluation of Agricultural Surface Water Distribution Systems Based on Water-food-energy Nexus and Using AHP-Entropy-WASPAS Technique. Water Resour Manage 36, 4697–4720 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03273-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03273-3

Keywords

Navigation