Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forecasting Daily Flood Water Level Using Hybrid Advanced Machine Learning Based Time-Varying Filtered Empirical Mode Decomposition Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate water level forecasting is important to understand and provide an early warning of flood risk and discharge. It is also crucial for many plants and animal species that needs specific ranges of water level. This research focused on long term multi-step ahead forecasting of daily flood water level in duration of (2005–2021) at two stations (i.e., Baryulgil and Lilydale) of the Clarence River, in Australia, introducing a novel hybrid framework coupling time varying filter-based empirical mode decomposition (TVF-EMD), classification and regression trees (CART) feature selection, and four advanced machine learning (ML) models. The implemented ML approaches are including Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), cascaded forward neural network (CFNN), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS). Here, original time series of WL in each station was decomposed into the optimal intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) using the TVF-EMD technique and the significant lagged-time components for two desired horizons (t + 1 and t + 7 time ahead) in each station was extracted by using the CART-feature selection method. Then, the IMFs and corresponded residual obtained from the pre-processing procedure were separately implemented to feed the ML models and produce the CART-TVF-EMD-LSTM, CART-TVF-EMD-CFNN, CART-TVF-EMD-MARS, and CART-TVF-EMD-GBDT by assembling all the individual sub-sequences outcomes. Several goodness-of-fit metrics such as correlation coefficient (R), Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) and the infographic tools and diagnostic analysis were employed to evaluate the robustness of the provided techniques. The outcomes of developed expert systems ascertained that CART-TVF-EMD-CFNN for one- and seven-day horizons in both stations outperformed the CART-TVF-EMD-MARS, CART-TVF-EMD-LSTM, CART-TVF-EMD-GBDT, and all the standalone counterpart models (i.e., CFNN, MARS, LSTM, and GBDT) respectively. As one of the most important achievements of this research, the LSTM did not lead to superior and promising results in the long-term highly nonstationary time series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

No data were used to support this study.

References

  • Abadi M (2016) TensorFlow: Learning functions at scale. Proc 21st ACM SIGPLAN Int Conf Funct Program. https://doi.org/10.1145/2951913.2976746

  • Abdullahi SI, Habaebi MH, Malik NA (2018) Flood disaster warning system on the go. In: 2018 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE). IEEE, pp 258–263

  • Ahmed AAM, Deo RC, Feng Q, Ghahramani A, Raj N, Yin Z, Yang L (2021) Deep learning hybrid model with Boruta-Random forest optimiser algorithm for streamflow forecasting with climate mode indices, rainfall, and periodicity. J Hydrol 599:126350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizamir M, Kim S, Kisi O, Zounemat-Kermani M (2020) A comparative study of several machine learning based non-linear regression methods in estimating solar radiation: Case studies of the USA and Turkey regions. Energy 117239

  • Alotaibi S, Amooie MA, Ahmadi MH, Nabipour N, Chau K (2020) Modeling thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids using multivariate adaptive regression splines and group method of data handling artificial neural network. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 14:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2020.1715843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvisi S, Mascellani G, Franchini M, Bárdossy A (2006) Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-1-2006

  • Anbazhagan S, Kumarappan N (2012) A neural network approach to day-ahead deregulated electricity market prices classification. Electr Power Syst Res 86:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2011.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TB (2017) kerasR: R Interface to the Keras deep learning library. J Open Source Softw 2:296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badde DS, Gupta A, Patki VK (2009) Cascade and feed forward back propagation artificial neural network models for prediction of compressive strength of ready mix concrete. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 1–6

  • Bafitlhile TM, Li Z (2019) Applicability of ε-Support Vector Machine and artificial neural network for flood forecasting in humid, semi-humid and semi-arid basins in China. Water (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya B, Solomatine DP (2005) Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level–discharge relationship. Neurocomputing 63:381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2004.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (2017) Classification and regression trees. Classif Regression Trees. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalagnol R, Gramcianinov CB, Crespo NM, Luiz R, Chiquetto JB, Marques MTA, Neto GD, de Abreu RC, Li S, Lott FC (2022) Extreme rainfall and its impacts in the Brazilian Minas Gerais state in January 2020: Can we blame climate change? Clim Resil Sustain 1:e15

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo RC, Kisi O, Singh VP (2017) Drought forecasting in eastern Australia using multivariate adaptive regression spline, least square support vector machine and M5Tree model. Atmos Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo RC, Şahin M (2016) An extreme learning machine model for the simulation of monthly mean streamflow water level in eastern Queensland. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5094-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Yue W, Wu L, Zhang F, Cai H, Wang X, Lu X, Xiang Y (2018) Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China. Agric for Meteorol 263:225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng D, Fang K, Shen C (2020) Enhancing streamflow forecast and extracting insights using long-short term memory networks with data integration at continental scales. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira LB, da Cunha FF (2020) Multi-step ahead forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using deep learning. Comput Electron Agric 178:105728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firat M, Turan ME, Yurdusev MA (2010) Comparative analysis of neural network techniques for predicting water consumption time series. J Hydrol 384:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal 38:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19:1–67. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu M, Le C, Fan T, Prakapovich R, Manko D, Dmytrenko O, Lande D, Shahid S, Yaseen ZM (2021) Integration of complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with deep long short-term memory model for particulate matter concentration prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–12

  • Galelli S, Castelletti A (2013) Tree-based iterative input variable selection for hydrological modeling. Water Resour Res 49(7):4295–4310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebremariam SY, Martin JF, DeMarchi C, Bosch NS, Confesor R, Ludsin SA (2014) A comprehensive approach to evaluating watershed models for predicting river flow regimes critical to downstream ecosystem services. Environ Model Softw 61:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire S, Yaseen ZM, Farooque AA, Deo RC (2021) Streamflow prediction using an integrated methodology based on convolutional neural network and long short - term memory networks. Sci Rep 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96751-4

  • Ghorbani MA, Deo RC, Karimi V, Yaseen ZM, Terzi O (2017) Implementation of a hybrid MLP-FFA model for water level prediction of Lake Egirdir, Turkey. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1474-0

  • Ghorbani MA, Khatibi R, Karimi V, Yaseen ZM, Zounemat-Kermani M (2018) Learning from multiple models using artificial intelligence to improve model prediction accuracies: Application to river flows. Water Resour Manag 32:4201–4215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2038-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayder G, Solihin MI, Mustafa HM (2020) Modelling of river flow using particle swarm optimized cascade-forward neural networks: a case study of Kelantan river in Malaysia. Appl Sci 10:8670. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber JJ (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanpanah E, Khosravinia P, Sanikhani H, Kisi O (2019) Estimation of discharge with free overfall in rectangular channel using artificial intelligence models. Flow Meas Instrum 67:118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamei M, Karbasi M, Alawi OA, Kamar HM, Khedher KM, Abba SI, Yaseen ZM (2022a) Earth skin temperature long-term prediction using novel extended Kalman filter integrated with Artificial Intelligence models and information gain feature selection. Sustain Comput Informatics Syst 35:100721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamei M, Ahmadianfar I, Jamei M, Karbasi M, Heidari AA, Chen H (2022b) Estimating daily global solar radiation in hot semi-arid climate using an efficient hybrid intelligent system. Eur Phys J plus 137:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javidan N, Kavian A, Pourghasemi HR, Conoscenti C, Jafarian Z (2019) Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using multivariate adaptive regression splines-replications and sample size scenarios. Water (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagoda PA, Ndiritu J, Ntuli C, Mwaka B (2010) Application of radial basis function neural networks to short-term streamflow forecasting. Phys Chem Earth 35:571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalagotla SK, Gangashetty SV, Giridhar K (2021) A novel stacking technique for prediction of diabetes. Comput Biol Med 135:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbasi M, Karbasi M, Jamei M, Malik A, Azamathulla HM (2022) Development of a new wavelet-based hybrid model to forecast multi-scalar SPEI drought index (case study: Zanjan city, Iran). Theor Appl Climatol 147:499–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03825-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Coulibaly P (2006) Application of support vector machine in lake water level prediction. J Hydrol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2006)11:3(199)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HI, Kim BH (2020) Flood hazard rating prediction for urban areas using random forest and LSTM. KSCE J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0951-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Seo Y, Rezaie-Balf M, Kisi O, Ghorbani MA, Singh VP (2019) Evaluation of daily solar radiation flux using soft computing approaches based on different meteorological information: peninsula vs continent. Theor Appl Climatol 137:693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2627-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Choubin B, Deo RC, Yaseen ZM (2019a) Incorporating synoptic-scale climate signals for streamflow modelling over the Mediterranean region using machine learning models. Hydrol Sci J

  • Kisi O, Khosravinia P, Nikpour MR, Sanikhani H (2019b) Hydrodynamics of river-channel confluence: toward modeling separation zone using GEP, MARS, M5 Tree and DENFIS techniques. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01684-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances Geosci 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wang Z, Qiu J (2019) Long-term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural network based on preprocessing technique. J Forecast 38:192–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Li Z, Mo W (2017a) A time varying filter approach for empirical mode decomposition. Signal Process 138:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Burian SJ (2022) Effects of nonstationarity in urban land cover and rainfall on historical flooding intensity in a semiarid catchment. J Sustain Water Built Environ 8:4022002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Johnson F, Evans J, Sharma A (2017b) A comparison of methods to estimate future sub-daily design rainfall. Adv Water Resour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Stones RJ, Wang G, Li Z, Liu X, Xiao K (2016) Being accurate is not enough: New metrics for disk failure prediction. In: 2016 IEEE 35th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), pp 71–80

  • Li X, Xu W, Ren M, Jiang Y, Fu G (2022) Hybrid CNN-LSTM models for river flow prediction. Water Supply. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livieris IE, Pintelas E, Pintelas P (2020) A CNN–LSTM model for gold price time-series forecasting. Neural Comput Appl 32:17351–17360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04867-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Ju Y, Wu L, Fan J, Zhang F, Li Z (2018) Daily pan evaporation modeling from local and cross-station data using three tree-based machine learning models. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A, Kumar A, Kisi O, Shiri J (2019) Evaluating the performance of four different heuristic approaches with Gamma test for daily suspended sediment concentration modeling. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05553-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masrur Ahmed AA, Deo RC, Raj N, Ghahramani A, Feng Q, Yin Z, Yang L (2021) Deep learning forecasts of soil moisture: Convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit models coupled with satellite-derived modis, observations and synoptic-scale climate index data. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehr AD, Kahya E, Olyaie E (2013) Streamflow prediction using linear genetic programming in comparison with a neuro-wavelet technique. J Hydrol 505:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing GS, Kratzert F, Sampson AK, Pelissier CS, Klotz D, Frame JM, Prieto C, Gupta HV (2021) What role does hydrological science play in the age of machine learning? Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal SC, Chowdhuri I, Das B, Chakrabortty R, Roy P, Saha A, Shit M (2022) Threats of climate change and land use patterns enhance the susceptibility of future floods in India. J Environ Manage 305:114317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Dutra E, Wetterhall F, Cloke HL (2012) Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4143–4156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Ali M, Xiang Y, Khan H (2020) A double decomposition-based modelling approach to forecast weekly solar radiation. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie-Balf M, Naganna SR, Kisi O, El-Shafie A (2019) Enhancing streamflow forecasting using the augmenting ensemble procedure coupled machine learning models: case study of Aswan High Dam. Hydrol Sci J. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1661417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanikhani H, Deo RC, Samui P, Kisi O, Mert C, Mirabbasi R, Gavili S, Yaseen ZM (2018) Survey of different data-intelligent modeling strategies for forecasting air temperature using geographic information as model predictors. Comput Electron Agric 152:242–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng D, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Chen G, Chen X (2021) Spatiotemporal prediction of air quality based on LSTM neural network. Alexandria Eng J 60:2021–2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafati A, Yaseen ZM, Pezeshki E (2020) Strategic assessment of dam overtopping reliability using a stochastic process approach. J Hydrol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Prasher SO, Patel RM, Ojasvi PR, Prakash C (2008) Performance of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) in predicting runoff in mid-Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data. Hydrol Sci J 53:1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.6.1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Kisi O (2010) Short-term and long-term streamflow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model. J Hydrol 394:486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloughter JM, Gneiting T, Raftery AE (2010) Probabilistic wind speed forecasting using ensembles and Bayesian model averaging. J Am Stat Assoc 105(489):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao H, Al-Bedyry NK, Khedher KM, Shahid S, Yaseen ZM (2021a) River water level prediction in coastal catchment using hybridized relevance vector machine model with improved grasshopper optimization. J Hydrol 598:126477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh UK, Jamei M, Karbasi M, Malik A, Pandey M (2022) Application of a modern multi-level ensemble approach for the estimation of critical shear stress in cohesive sediment mixture. J Hydrol 127549

  • Tao H, Awadh SM, Salih SQ, Shafik SS, Yaseen ZM (2021b) Integration of extreme gradient boosting feature selection approach with machine learning models: application of weather relative humidity prediction. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06362-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao H, Salih S, Oudah AY, Abba SI, Ameen AMS, Awadh SM, Alawi OA, Mostafa RR, Surendran UP, Yaseen ZM (2022) Development of new computational machine learning models for longitudinal dispersion coefficient determination: Case study of natural streams, United States. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18554-y

  • Tengeleng S, Armand N (2014) Performance of using cascade forward back propagation neural networks for estimating rain parameters with rain drop size distribution. Atmosphere (basel) 5:454–472. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos5020454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari MK, Chatterjee C (2011) A new wavelet–bootstrap–ANN hybrid model for daily discharge forecasting. J Hydroinf 13(3):500–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran Q-K, Song S (2017) Water level forecasting based on deep learning: a use case of Trinity River-Texas-The United States. J KIISE 44:607–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Fu W, Chen T, Zhang B, Xiong D, Fang P (2020) A compound framework for wind speed forecasting based on comprehensive feature selection, quantile regression incorporated into convolutional simplified long short-term memory network and residual error correction. Energy Convers Manag 222:113234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Rezaie-Balf M, Naganna SR, Yaseen ZM (2021) Sourcing CHIRPS precipitation data for streamflow forecasting using Intrinsic Time-scale Decomposition based Machine Learning models. Hydrol Sci J

  • Wang Y, Yuan Z, Liu H, Xing Z, Ji Y, Li H, Fu Q, Mo C (2022) A new scheme for probabilistic forecasting with an ensemble model based on CEEMDAN and AM-MCMC and its application in precipitation forecasting. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsito B, Santoso R, Yasin H (2018) Cascade forward neural network for time series prediction. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p 12097

  • Wu L, Peng Y, Fan J, Wang Y (2019) Machine learning models for the estimation of monthly mean daily reference evapotranspiration based on cross-station and synthetic data. Hydrol Res. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhang Q, Hu Y, Sun-Woo K, Zhang X, Zhu H, Li S et al (2022) Novel binary logistic regression model based on feature transformation of XGBoost for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus prediction in healthcare systems. Futur Gener Comput Syst 129:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Z, Yan J, Demir I (2020) A rainfall-runoff model with LSTM-based sequence-to-sequence learning. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Hou Z, Han Y, Guo W (2016) A diagram for evaluating multiple aspects of model performance in simulating vector fields. Geosci Model Dev 9:4365–4380. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4365-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, Awadh SM, Sharafati A, Shahid S (2018a) Complementary data-intelligence model for river flow simulation. J Hydrol 567:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, El-Shafie A, Afan HA, Hameed M, Mohtar WHMW, Hussain A (2015) RBFNN versus FFNN for daily river flow forecasting at Johor River. Neural Comput. Appl, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1952-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, Sulaiman SO, Deo RC, Chau K-W (2019) An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J Hydrol 569:387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, Sulaiman SO, Deo RC, Chau K-W (2018b) An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: state-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J Hydrol 569:387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Deng Z, Ines AVM, Wu J, Rasu E (2020) Forecast of short-term daily reference evapotranspiration under limited meteorological variables using a hybrid bi-directional long short-term memory model (Bi-LSTM). Agric Water Manag 242:106386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng J, Jamei M, Amar MN, Hasanipanah M, Bayat P (2021) A novel solution for simulating air overpressure resulting from blasting using an efficient cascaded forward neural network. Eng Comput 1–13

  • Zhang J, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Ye M, Yang J (2018a) Developing a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based model for predicting water table depth in agricultural areas. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Xu F, Hu M, Zhang L, Liu H, Li M (2021) A novel denoising algorithm based on TVF-EMD and its application in fault classification of rotating machinery. Measurement 179:109337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Liu Z, Miao Q, Wang L (2018b) An optimized time varying filtering based empirical mode decomposition method with grey wolf optimizer for machinery fault diagnosis. J Sound Vib 418:55–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao DH, Shen HW, Tabios GQ, Lai JS, Tan WY (1994) Finite-volume two-dimensional unsteady-flow model for river basins. J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1994)120:7(863)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Bureau of Meteorology, Australia and the NSW Office of Water and the NSW Department of Service Technology and Administration (Manly Hydraulics Laboratory).

Funding

Authors declare that there is no funding source available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mehdi Jamie: Writing- Visualization, Original draft preparation, Conceptualization, Methodology, and Software. Mumtaz Ali: Original draft preparation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing, Investigation, Supervision. Anurag Malik: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Ramendra Prasad: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Shahab Abdulla: Reviewing and Editing. Zaher Mundher Yaseen: Supervision, writing manuscript, visualizing, validation, investigation, reviewing and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mehdi Jamei or Mumtaz Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not Applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent to Publish

All authors are aware about this submission/Publication.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamei, M., Ali, M., Malik, A. et al. Forecasting Daily Flood Water Level Using Hybrid Advanced Machine Learning Based Time-Varying Filtered Empirical Mode Decomposition Approach. Water Resour Manage 36, 4637–4676 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03270-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03270-6

Keywords

Navigation