Skip to main content

Linking Hydro-Physical Variables and Landscape Metrics using Advanced Data Mining for Stream-Flow Prediction

Abstract

In Streamflow prediction the most important triggering/controlling variables are related to climate, physiography, and landscape patterns. This study investigated the effect of different landscape metrics to relate spatial patterns to surface runoff processes and predict monthly streamflow using climatic and physiographic variables for the 42 sub-basins of the Urmia Lake Basin in Iran. We developed an innovative data-driven framework and considered two different modelling approaches i.e., modelling in homogenous clusters (local approach) and modelling in the entire area as an entity (global approach). The results of basin LULC monitoring from the 20-year experimental period display drastic changes in the land use of the basin such as reduction in lake area (48.3%) due to increasing irrigated areas (22.5%), increasing residential areas (14.2%), and decrease in rangeland (6.0%). Streamflow prediction results in the global experiment showed Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Random Forest (RF) with NSE of 0.76 and NRMSE of 6.44% have similar results and outperformed Partial Least Squares regression (PLS), but in clustering experiment GMDH with NSE of 0.88 and NRMSE of 5% shows the highest accuracy and outperformed both RF and PLS. The results confirmed that modelling in homogenous clusters (local prediction) significantly enhanced the performance of prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Bakhshianlamouki E, Masia S, Karimi P, van der Zaag P, Sušnik JA (2020) system dynamics model to quantify the impacts of restoration measures on the water-energy-food nexus in the Urmia lake Basin. Iran Sci of the Tot Env 708:134874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnia N, Zare M, Moosavi V, Khajeddin SI (2020) Evaluation of a Hierarchical Classification Method and Statistical Comparison with Pixel-Based and Object-Oriented Approaches. ECOP 10:8(4):209–19

  • Behnia N, Zare M, Moosavi V, Khajeddin SJ (2022) An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval. Earth Sci Inf 15:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin L, Xu K, Xu X, Lian J, Ma C (2018) Development of a landscape indicator to evaluate the effect of landscape pattern on surface runoff in the Haihe River Basin. J Hyd 566:546–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boongaling CGK, Faustino-Eslava DV, Lansigan FP (2018) Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: The case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines. Land Use Pol 72:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random Forests Machine Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi W (2008) Catchment-scale hydrological response to climate-land-use combined scenarios: A case study for the Kishwaukee River Basin. Illinois Phy Geog 29(1):79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • do Nascimento TVM, Santos CAG, de Farias CAS et al (2022) Monthly Streamflow Modeling Based on Self-Organizing Maps and Satellite-Estimated Rainfall Data. Wat Res Man 36:2359–2377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03147-8

  • Gill MK, Kaheil YH, Khalil A, McKee M, Bastidas L (2006) Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology. Wat Res Res 42(7):W07417. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao S, Zhu F, Cui Y (2021) Land use and land cover change detection and spatial distribution on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci Rep 11(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Ivakhnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 1(4):364–378

  • Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Patt Recog Lett 31(8):651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HW, Park Y (2016) Urban green infrastructure and local flooding: The impact of landscape patterns on peak runoff in four Texas MSAs. Appli Geog 77:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo RJ, Potti Y, Zulvia FE (2018) Application of metaheuristic based fuzzy K-modes algorithm to supplier clustering. Comp & Indust Eng 120:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laohakiat S, Sa-ing V (2021) An incremental density-based clustering framework using fuzzy local clustering. Inf Sci 547:404–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Bi X, Wang L, Han X (2021) A method of two-stage clustering learning based on improved DBSCAN and density peak algorithm. Comp Communic 167:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian Y, Luo J, Xue W et al (2022) Cause-driven Streamflow Forecasting Framework Based on Linear Correlation Reconstruction and Long Short-term Memory. Wat Res Man 36:1661–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03097-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Yin C, Chen X, Xu W, Lu L (2010) Combining system dynamic model and CLUE-S model to improve land use scenario analyses at regional scale: A case study of Sangong watershed in Xinjiang China. Ecol Complex 7(2):198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K (2015) FRAGSTATS help. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijani N, Alavipanah SK, Firozjaei MK, Arsanjani JJ, Hamzeh S, Weng Q (2020) Modeling outdoor thermal comfort using satellite imagery: A principle component analysis-based approach. Ecol Indic 117:106555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei M, Jafari A, Bakhtiari AR, Mohebbi S, Shooshtari SJ, Soureshjani HK (2020) Configurationally analysis of relationships between land-cover characteristics and river water quality in a real scenario. Int J Env Sci and Tec 1–16

  • Mohseni O, Stefan HG (1998) A monthly streamflow model. Wat Res Res 34(5):1287–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosavi V, Karami A, Behnia N (2021) Toward Linking Landscape Metrics and Environmental Variables for Runoff Modelling and Assessment, in: Third International Youth Forum Soil Water Conserv. (3rd IYFSWC). Mazandaran, Iran

  • Moosavi V, Talebi A, Hadian MR (2017) Development of a hybrid wavelet packet-group method of data handling (WPGMDH) model for runoff forecasting. Wat Res Manag 31(1):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing GS, Kratzert F, Sampson AK, Pelissier CS, Klotz D, Frame JM, Gupta HV (2021) What role does hydrological science play in the age of machine learning? Wat Res Res 57(3):e2020WR028091

  • Petropoulos GP, Kalivas DP, Georgopoulou IA, Srivastava PK (2015) Urban vegetation cover extraction from hyperspectral imagery and geographic information system spatial analysis techniques: case of Athens Greece. J Appl Rem Sen 9(1):096088. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samal DR, Gedam S (2021) Assessing the impacts of land use and land cover change on water resources in the Upper Bhima river basin. India Envir Challe 5:100251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz S, Darehshouri S, Hassanzadeh E, Tajrishy M, Schüth C (2020) Climate change or irrigated agriculture–what drives the water level decline of Lake Urmia. Sci Rep 10(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavousi T, Kajehamiri Khaledi C, Salari Fanoudi M (2021) Review of Iran’s Climatic Zoning Based on Some Climate Variables. Des Manag 8(16):17–36. https://doi.org/10.22034/jdmal.2021.243138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M, Pages J, Ambroisine L, Guinot C (2005) PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Qual and Pref 16(4):315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L (2001) PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemo and Intell Lab Sys 58(2):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo IY, Gordon SI, Guldmann JM (2004) Optimizing patterns of land use to reduce peak runoff flow and nonpoint source pollution with an integrated hydrological and land-use model. Earth Interac 8(6):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V. Moosavi: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Project administration; Supervision; Software; Roles/Writing—original draft. A. Karami: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Validation; Visualization; Software; Writing—review & editing. N. Behnia: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Software; Methodology; Visualization. R. Berndtsson and Ch. Massari: Conceptualization; Writing—review & editing; Methodology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Moosavi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moosavi, V., Karami, A., Behnia, N. et al. Linking Hydro-Physical Variables and Landscape Metrics using Advanced Data Mining for Stream-Flow Prediction. Water Resour Manage 36, 4255–4273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03251-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03251-9

Keywords